These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38635366)
1. Genetic Variation in Male Aggression Is Influenced by Genotype of Prior Social Partners in Hutchins M; Douglas T; Pollack L; Saltz JB Am Nat; 2024 May; 203(5):551-561. PubMed ID: 38635366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Genetic composition of social groups influences male aggressive behaviour and fitness in natural genotypes of Drosophila melanogaster. Saltz JB Proc Biol Sci; 2013 Nov; 280(1771):20131926. PubMed ID: 24068359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Social effects for locomotion vary between environments in Drosophila melanogaster females. Signor SA; Abbasi M; Marjoram P; Nuzhdin SV Evolution; 2017 Jul; 71(7):1765-1775. PubMed ID: 28489252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Increased developmental density decreases the magnitude of indirect genetic effects expressed during agonistic interactions in an insect. Han CS; Tuni C; Ulcik J; Dingemanse NJ Evolution; 2018 Nov; 72(11):2435-2448. PubMed ID: 30221347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Genetic variation in social environment construction influences the development of aggressive behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. Saltz JB Heredity (Edinb); 2017 Apr; 118(4):340-347. PubMed ID: 27848947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Indirect genetic effects and the evolution of aggression in a vertebrate system. Wilson AJ; Gelin U; Perron MC; Réale D Proc Biol Sci; 2009 Feb; 276(1656):533-41. PubMed ID: 18842544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Indirect genetic effects: a key component of the genetic architecture of behaviour. Santostefano F; Wilson AJ; Niemelä PT; Dingemanse NJ Sci Rep; 2017 Aug; 7(1):10235. PubMed ID: 28860450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Indirect genetic effects and sexual conflicts: Partner genotype influences multiple morphological and behavioral reproductive traits in a flatworm. Marie-Orleach L; Vogt-Burri N; Mouginot P; Schlatter A; Vizoso DB; Bailey NW; Schärer L Evolution; 2017 May; 71(5):1232-1245. PubMed ID: 28252800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative genetics of natural variation of behavior in Drosophila melanogaster: the possible role of the social environment on creating persistent patterns of group activity. Higgins LA; Jones KM; Wayne ML Evolution; 2005 Jul; 59(7):1529-39. PubMed ID: 16153038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Natural genetic variation in social niche construction: social effects of aggression drive disruptive sexual selection in Drosophila melanogaster. Saltz JB; Foley BR Am Nat; 2011 May; 177(5):645-54. PubMed ID: 21508610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Indirect genetic effects for social network structure in Wice EW; Saltz JB Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2023 Apr; 378(1874):20220075. PubMed ID: 36802774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Conditional indirect genetic effects of caregivers on brood in the clonal raider ant. Piekarski PK; Valdés-Rodríguez S; Kronauer DJC Behav Ecol; 2023; 34(4):642-652. PubMed ID: 37434637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. GxG epistasis in growth and condition and the maintenance of genetic polymorphism in Gambusia holbrooki. Culumber ZW; Kraft B; Lemakos V; Hoffner E; Travis J; Hughes KA Evolution; 2018 May; 72(5):1146-1154. PubMed ID: 29604041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Phenotypic plasticity in female mate choice behavior is mediated by an interaction of direct and indirect genetic effects in Filice DCS; Long TAF Ecol Evol; 2017 May; 7(10):3542-3551. PubMed ID: 28515889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]