32 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38635674)
1. Feeding efficiency of two coexisting nectarivorous bat species (Phyllostomidae: Glossophaginae) at flowers of two key-resource plants.
Bechler JP; Steiner K; Tschapka M
PLoS One; 2024; 19(6):e0303227. PubMed ID: 38924018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The behavioral ecology of nectar robbing: why be tactic constant?
Bronstein JL; Barker JL; Lichtenberg EM; Richardson LL; Irwin RE
Curr Opin Insect Sci; 2017 Jun; 21():14-18. PubMed ID: 28822483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Floral visitors of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.): Elucidating their nectar-robbing behaviour and impacts on the plant reproduction.
Layek U; Bhandari T; Das A; Karmakar P
PLoS One; 2024; 19(4):e0300398. PubMed ID: 38635674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nectar replenishment maintains the neutral effects of nectar robbing on female reproductive success of Salvia przewalskii (Lamiaceae), a plant pollinated and robbed by bumble bees.
Ye ZM; Jin XF; Wang QF; Yang CF; Inouye DW
Ann Bot; 2017 Apr; 119(6):1053-1059. PubMed ID: 28158409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Spatio-temporal variation of nectar robbing in Salvia gesneriflora and its effects on nectar production and legitimate visitors.
Cuevas E; Rosas-Guerrero V
Plant Biol (Stuttg); 2016 Jan; 18(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 25677960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Floral nectar guide patterns discourage nectar robbing by bumble bees.
Leonard AS; Brent J; Papaj DR; Dornhaus A
PLoS One; 2013; 8(2):e55914. PubMed ID: 23418475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Behavioural differences between male and female carpenter bees in nectar robbing and its effect on reproductive success in Glechoma longituba (Lamiaceae).
Zhang YW; Zhao JM; Yang CF; Gituru WR
Plant Biol (Stuttg); 2011 Jan; 13 Suppl 1():25-32. PubMed ID: 21134084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Floral trait variation across individual plants within a population enhances defense capability to nectar robbing.
Tie S; He YD; Lázaro A; Inouye DW; Guo YH; Yang CF
Plant Divers; 2023 May; 45(3):315-325. PubMed ID: 37397606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intercropping with Pigeonpea (
Layek U; Kundu A; Das N; Mondal R; Karmakar P
Life (Basel); 2023 Jan; 13(1):. PubMed ID: 36676141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Nectar robbing in bellflower (Sesamum radiatum) benefited pollinators but unaffected maternal function of plant reproduction.
Varma S; Sinu PA
Sci Rep; 2019 Jun; 9(1):8357. PubMed ID: 31175314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact of floral larceny on individuals, populations, and communities.
Irwin RE; Brody AK; Waser NM
Oecologia; 2001 Oct; 129(2):161-168. PubMed ID: 28547611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preferential nectar robbing of flowers with long corollas: experimental studies of two hummingbird species visiting three plant species.
Lara C; Ornelas J
Oecologia; 2001 Jul; 128(2):263-273. PubMed ID: 28547475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Variation in nectar robbing over time, space, and species.
Irwin RE; Maloof JE
Oecologia; 2002 Dec; 133(4):525-533. PubMed ID: 28466170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
