These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3863675)

  • 1. Bimaxillary protrusion in the Caucasian: a cephalometric study of the morphological features.
    Keating PJ
    Br J Orthod; 1985 Oct; 12(4):193-201. PubMed ID: 3863675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sagittal lip positions in different skeletal malocclusions: a cephalometric analysis.
    Joshi M; Wu LP; Maharjan S; Regmi MR
    Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():8. PubMed ID: 26061982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A new approach to cephalometric analysis of the dental base relationship.
    Johnson JS
    Angle Orthod; 1978 Jan; 48(1):23-32. PubMed ID: 272128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The treatment of bimaxillary protrusion. A cephalometric consideration of changes in the inter-incisal angle and soft tissue profile.
    Keating PJ
    Br J Orthod; 1986 Oct; 13(4):209-20. PubMed ID: 3465369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correlations among craniofacial angles and dimensions in Class I and Class II malocclusions.
    Anderson D; Popovich F
    Angle Orthod; 1989; 59(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 2923320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Longitudinal cephalometric growth of untreated subjects with Class II Division 2 malocclusion.
    Barbosa LAG; Araujo E; Behrents RG; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 May; 151(5):914-920. PubMed ID: 28457269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relationship between cranial base and maxillofacial morphology.
    Kasai K; Moro T; Kanazawa E; Iwasawa T
    Eur J Orthod; 1995 Oct; 17(5):403-10. PubMed ID: 8529753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Variation in maxillary and mandibular molar and incisor vertical dimension in 12-year-old subjects with excess, normal, and short lower anterior face height.
    Janson GR; Metaxas A; Woodside DG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Oct; 106(4):409-18. PubMed ID: 7942657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Morphological studies on the bimaxillary protrusion patients. Part 1. On Angle Class I malocclusion (author's transl)].
    Iwasawa T; Yamazaki T; Kawasaki H; Ohkawa S; Mimori M
    Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1980 Jun; 39(2):157-66. PubMed ID: 6935308
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Facial prognathism and its relation to the cranial base in Brazilian children with Class I malocclusion].
    Mestriner Júnior W; Valente A
    Rev Odontol Univ Sao Paulo; 1989; 3(2):324-33. PubMed ID: 2639454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. ANB skeletal types correlated to facial morphology: Euclidean distance matrix analysis.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; D'Addona A; Miani A; Poggio CE
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1993; 8(3):181-90. PubMed ID: 8301166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dentoskeletal morphology in adults with Class I, Class II Division 1, or Class II Division 2 malocclusion with increased overbite.
    Uzuner FD; Aslan BI; Dinçer M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Aug; 156(2):248-256.e2. PubMed ID: 31375235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Morphological studies on the bimaxillary protrusion patients. Part 3. Angle Class III malocclusion comparatively analyzed with Class I and Class II patients (author's transl)].
    Iwasawa T; Shimizu N; Yamauchi E; Yamada W; Fujiwara K
    Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1980 Jun; 39(2):176-85. PubMed ID: 6935310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cephalometric morphology of Chinese with Class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Lau JW; Hägg U
    Br Dent J; 1999 Feb; 186(4 Spec No):188-90. PubMed ID: 10205956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-dimensional soft-tissue and hard-tissue changes in the treatment of bimaxillary protrusion.
    Solem RC; Marasco R; Guiterrez-Pulido L; Nielsen I; Kim SH; Nelson G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Aug; 144(2):218-28. PubMed ID: 23910203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cephalometric norms for the Chinese: a compilation of existing data.
    Moate SJ; Darendeliler MA
    Aust Orthod J; 2002 Mar; 18(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 12502125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Soft tissue profile changes associated with orthognathic surgery for bimaxillary protrusion.
    Nadkarni PG
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1986 Nov; 44(11):851-4. PubMed ID: 3464710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Components of adult Class III open-bite malocclusion.
    Ellis E; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod; 1984 Oct; 86(4):277-90. PubMed ID: 6592976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new approach of assessing sagittal discrepancies: the Beta angle.
    Baik CY; Ververidou M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Jul; 126(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 15224065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.