These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
45. Surface roughness of various packable composites. Ryba TM; Dunn WJ; Murchison DF Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):243-7. PubMed ID: 12022454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. The proximal finishing of posterior composite restorations. Razak AA Singapore Dent J; 1984 May; 9(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 6599642 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. [The polishing effect of paste type polishing materials and Soflex Polishing Strips on the surface roughness of a composite resin]. Momoi Y; Yamamoto M; Yoshida T; Wada K; Izawa M; Ataka N; Murasawa H; Kono A Tsurumi Shigaku; 1982 May; 8(2):223-36. PubMed ID: 6957067 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. The effect of air polishing on contemporary esthetic restorative materials. Carr MP; Mitchell JC; Seghi RR; Vermilyea SG Gen Dent; 2002; 50(3):238-41. PubMed ID: 12116510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. The effect of two polishing pastes on the surface roughness of bis-acryl composite and methacrylate-based resins. Sen D; Göller G; Işsever H J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Nov; 88(5):527-32. PubMed ID: 12474004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. The effect of finishing method on the microleakage of Class V microfilled composite resin restorations. Brackett WW; Girdwood BJ J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1999 Apr; 79(2):24-5. PubMed ID: 10726577 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Surface wear on cervical restorations and adjacent enamel and root cementum caused by simulated long-term maintenance therapy. Rühling A; Wulf J; Schwahn C; Kocher T J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Apr; 31(4):293-8. PubMed ID: 15016258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Longevity of composite restorations of traumatically injured teeth. Spinas E Am J Dent; 2004 Dec; 17(6):407-11. PubMed ID: 15724751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. How do composite resins stand the test of time? Mopper KW Dent Today; 2004 May; 23(5):74-6, 78-9. PubMed ID: 15164478 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid composite resin and ormocer-based tooth-colored restorative materials after several finishing and polishing procedures. Başeren M J Biomater Appl; 2004 Oct; 19(2):121-34. PubMed ID: 15381785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. [Problems involved in composite resin restorations in Class 2 cavities--overflow of proximal surfaces]. Katayama H; Ura K; Nakagawa T; Tabata C; Takei T; Kochi T; Amano Y; Katayama I Josai Shika Daigaku Kiyo; 1984; 13(3):578-83. PubMed ID: 6598398 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Influence of finishing and polishing procedures on the decision to replace old amalgam restorations: an in vitro study. Oleinisky JC; Baratieri LN; Ritter AV; Felipe LA; de Freitas SF Quintessence Int; 1996 Dec; 27(12):833-40. PubMed ID: 9452677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Contouring, finishing, and polishing Class 5 restorative materials. Hondrum SO; Fernández R Oper Dent; 1997; 22(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 9227125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. The in vivo perception of roughness of restorations. Jones CS; Billington RW; Pearson GJ Br Dent J; 2004 Jan; 196(1):42-5; discussion 31. PubMed ID: 14966503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Practical procedures No 11. Simplified finishing procedures for posterior direct resin restorations. Freedman G Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2005 Mar; 17(2):3 p preceding 137. PubMed ID: 15918308 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. [Changes of surface roughness and glossiness of the composite resins during polishing]. Ji A; Gao C; Ikuemon K Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1999 May; 34(3):181-3. PubMed ID: 11776936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]