161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38639938)
1. Nationwide Association of Surgical Performance of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy With Patient Outcomes.
Ketel MHM; Klarenbeek BR; Abma I; Belgers EHJ; Coene PLO; Dekker JWT; van Duijvendijk P; Emous M; Gisbertz SS; Haveman JW; Heisterkamp J; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Ruurda JP; van Sandick JW; van der Sluis PC; van Det MJ; van Esser S; Law S; de Steur WO; Sosef MN; Wijnhoven B; Hannink G; Rosman C; van Workum F;
JAMA Netw Open; 2024 Apr; 7(4):e246556. PubMed ID: 38639938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Video-Based Procedure-Specific Competency Assessment Tool for Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.
Ketel MHM; Klarenbeek BR; Eddahchouri Y; Cheong E; Cuesta MA; van Daele E; Ferri LE; Gisbertz SS; Gutschow CA; Hubka M; Hölscher AH; Law S; Luyer MDP; Merritt RE; Morse CR; Mueller CL; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Nilsson M; Pattyn P; Shen Y; van den Wildenberg FJH; Abma IL; Rosman C; van Workum F
JAMA Surg; 2024 Mar; 159(3):297-305. PubMed ID: 38150247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of hospital experience in bariatric surgery on short-term outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: a nationwide analysis.
Janssen HJB; Geraedts TCM; Simkens GA; Visser M; de Hingh IHJT; van Det MJ; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; van Hillegersberg R; Luyer MDP; Nienhuijs SW
Surg Endosc; 2024 Feb; 38(2):720-734. PubMed ID: 38040832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparisons between minimally invasive and open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with cervical anastomosis: a retrospective study.
Li Z; Liu C; Liu Y; Yao S; Xu B; Dong G
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Jun; 15(1):128. PubMed ID: 32513211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Salvage minimally invasive esophagectomy after definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer can improve postoperative complications compared with salvage open esophagectomy.
Ishiyama K; Oguma J; Kubo K; Kanematsu K; Kurita D; Daiko H
Surg Endosc; 2022 May; 36(5):3504-3510. PubMed ID: 34642795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A standardized comparison of peri-operative complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy: Ivor Lewis versus McKeown.
Brown AM; Pucci MJ; Berger AC; Tatarian T; Evans NR; Rosato EL; Palazzo F
Surg Endosc; 2018 Jan; 32(1):204-211. PubMed ID: 28643075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robot-assisted Versus Conventional Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Resectable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Early Results of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial: the RAMIE Trial.
Yang Y; Li B; Yi J; Hua R; Chen H; Tan L; Li H; He Y; Guo X; Sun Y; Yu B; Li Z
Ann Surg; 2022 Apr; 275(4):646-653. PubMed ID: 34171870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) vs. hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy: propensity score matched short-term outcome analysis of a European high-volume center.
Babic B; Müller DT; Jung JO; Schiffmann LM; Grisar P; Schmidt T; Chon SH; Schröder W; Bruns CJ; Fuchs HF
Surg Endosc; 2022 Oct; 36(10):7747-7755. PubMed ID: 35505259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Clinical observation on perioperative complications of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis and minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy].
Zhou JM; Jing SJ; Lu QT; Chu X; Xue T
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2022 Jun; 44(6):577-580. PubMed ID: 35754233
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Population-Based Cohort Study from a Prospective National Registry: Better Long-Term Survival in Esophageal Cancer After Minimally Invasive Compared with Open Transthoracic Esophagectomy.
Hayami M; Ndegwa N; Lindblad M; Linder G; Hedberg J; Edholm D; Johansson J; Lagergren J; Lundell L; Nilsson M; Rouvelas I
Ann Surg Oncol; 2022 Sep; 29(9):5609-5621. PubMed ID: 35752726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Conversion to open surgery during minimally invasive esophagectomy portends worse short-term outcomes: an analysis of the National Cancer Database.
Halpern AL; Friedman C; Torphy RJ; Al-Musawi MH; Mitchell JD; Scott CD; Meguid RA; McCarter MD; Weyant MJ; Gleisner AL
Surg Endosc; 2020 Aug; 34(8):3470-3478. PubMed ID: 31591657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intrathoracic vs Cervical Anastomosis After Totally or Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
van Workum F; Verstegen MHP; Klarenbeek BR; Bouwense SAW; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Daams F; Gisbertz SS; Hannink G; Haveman JW; Heisterkamp J; Jansen W; Kouwenhoven EA; van Lanschot JJB; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; van der Peet DL; Polat F; Ubels S; Wijnhoven BPL; Rovers MM; Rosman C;
JAMA Surg; 2021 Jul; 156(7):601-610. PubMed ID: 33978698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. FA01.01: MINIMALLY INVASIVE APPROACH RESULTS IN BETTER OUTCOME COMPARED TO OPEN ESOPHAGECTOMY-A PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHED ANALYSIS.
Kwan Kit Chan D; Siu Yin Chan F; King Hung Tong D; Yu Hong Wong I; Lai Yin Wong C; Ting Law T; Ying Kit Law S
Dis Esophagus; 2018 Sep; 31(13):1. PubMed ID: 30219909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of surgical approach on perioperative and long-term outcomes following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
Ahmadi N; Crnic A; Seely AJ; Sundaresan SR; Villeneuve PJ; Maziak DE; Shamji FM; Gilbert S
Surg Endosc; 2018 Apr; 32(4):1892-1900. PubMed ID: 29067584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robotic Versus Conventional Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Meta-analysis.
Zhang Y; Dong D; Cao Y; Huang M; Li J; Zhang J; Lin J; Sarkaria IS; Toni L; David R; He J; Li H
Ann Surg; 2023 Jul; 278(1):39-50. PubMed ID: 36538615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) compared to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.
Tagkalos E; Goense L; Hoppe-Lotichius M; Ruurda JP; Babic B; Hadzijusufovic E; Kneist W; van der Sluis PC; Lang H; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP
Dis Esophagus; 2020 Apr; 33(4):. PubMed ID: 31206577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Open left thoracoabdominal esophagectomy a viable option in the era of minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Klevebro F; Han S; Ash S; Mueller C; Cools-Lartigue J; Maynard N; Ferri L; Low D
Dis Esophagus; 2022 Dec; 36(1):. PubMed ID: 35511475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term Survival After Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Nationwide Propensity-score Matched Analysis.
Kalff MC; Fransen LFC; de Groot EM; Gisbertz SS; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Ruurda JP; Verhoeven RHA; Luyer MDP; van Hillegersberg R; van Berge Henegouwen MI;
Ann Surg; 2022 Dec; 276(6):e749-e757. PubMed ID: 33378310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hospital Variation in Feeding Jejunostomy Policy for Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: A Nationwide Cohort Study.
Visser MR; Straatman J; Voeten DM; Gisbertz SS; Ruurda JP; Luyer MDP; van der Sluis PC; van der Peet DL; van Berge Henegouwen MI; van Hillegersberg R;
Nutrients; 2022 Dec; 15(1):. PubMed ID: 36615812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of Open Versus Minimally Invasive Transthoracic Esophagectomy in the Netherlands.
Seesing MFJ; Gisbertz SS; Goense L; van Hillegersberg R; Kroon HM; Lagarde SM; Ruurda JP; Slaman AE; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Wijnhoven BPL
Ann Surg; 2017 Nov; 266(5):839-846. PubMed ID: 28796016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
