162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38639938)
21. Total minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal adenocarcinoma reduces postoperative pain and pneumonia compared to hybrid esophagectomy.
Berlth F; Plum PS; Chon SH; Gutschow CA; Bollschweiler E; Hölscher AH
Surg Endosc; 2018 Dec; 32(12):4957-4965. PubMed ID: 29931451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Lower Incidence of Postoperative Pulmonary Complications Following Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: Propensity Score-Matched Comparison to Conventional Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.
Tsunoda S; Obama K; Hisamori S; Nishigori T; Okamura R; Maekawa H; Sakai Y
Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Feb; 28(2):639-647. PubMed ID: 32892268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Impact of intraoperative fluid management on postoperative complications in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a retrospective single-center study.
Takahashi M; Toyama H; Takahashi K; Kaiho Y; Ejima Y; Yamauchi M
BMC Anesthesiol; 2024 Jan; 24(1):29. PubMed ID: 38238681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A prospective comparison of totally minimally invasive versus open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.
Noble F; Kelly JJ; Bailey IS; Byrne JP; Underwood TJ;
Dis Esophagus; 2013 Apr; 26(3):263-71. PubMed ID: 23551569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Anastomosis in minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy via two ports provides equivalent perioperative outcomes to open.
Zhao Y; Jiao W; Zhao J; Wang X; Luo Y; Wang Y
Indian J Cancer; 2015 Feb; 51 Suppl 2():e25-8. PubMed ID: 25712837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Robot-assisted and conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy are associated with better postoperative results compared to hybrid and open transthoracic esophagectomy.
van der Sluis PC; Babic B; Uzun E; Tagkalos E; Berlth F; Hadzijusufovic E; Lang H; Gockel I; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 Apr; 48(4):776-782. PubMed ID: 34838394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer compared with video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: A single-center retrospective study.
Morimoto Y; Kawakubo H; Ishikawa A; Matsuda S; Hijikata N; Ando M; Mayanagi S; Irino T; Nakamura R; Wada N; Tsuji T; Kitagawa Y
Asian J Endosc Surg; 2022 Apr; 15(2):270-278. PubMed ID: 34637190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Morbidity and Mortality of Patients Who Underwent Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy vs Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Wang H; Tang H; Fang Y; Tan L; Yin J; Shen Y; Zeng Z; Zhu J; Hou Y; Du M; Jiao J; Jiang H; Gong L; Li Z; Liu J; Xie D; Li W; Lian C; Zhao Q; Chen C; Zheng B; Liao Y; Li K; Li H; Wu H; Dai L; Chen KN
JAMA Surg; 2021 May; 156(5):444-451. PubMed ID: 33729467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Robot-assisted esophagectomy (RAE) versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: protocol for a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial (RAMIE trial, robot-assisted minimally invasive Esophagectomy).
Yang Y; Zhang X; Li B; Li Z; Sun Y; Mao T; Hua R; Yang Y; Guo X; He Y; Li H; Chen H; Tan L
BMC Cancer; 2019 Jun; 19(1):608. PubMed ID: 31226960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A retrospective study of preoperative malnutrition based on the Controlling Nutritional Status score as an associated marker for short-term outcomes after open and minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
Horinouchi T; Yoshida N; Harada K; Eto K; Sawayama H; Iwatsuki M; Iwagami S; Baba Y; Miyamoto Y; Baba H
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Dec; 407(8):3367-3375. PubMed ID: 35976434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparisons of minimally invasive esophagectomy and open esophagectomy in lymph node metastasis/dissection for thoracic esophageal cancer.
Li Z; Gai C; Zhang Y; Wen S; Lv H; Xu Y; Huang C; Zhao B; Tian Z
Chin Med J (Engl); 2022 Oct; 135(20):2446-2452. PubMed ID: 36507705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Nationwide analysis of short-term surgical outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy for malignancy.
Thirunavukarasu P; Gabriel E; Attwood K; Kukar M; Hochwald SN; Nurkin SJ
Int J Surg; 2016 Jan; 25():69-75. PubMed ID: 26602969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Is there any benefit to incorporating a laparoscopic procedure into minimally invasive esophagectomy? The impact on perioperative results in patients with esophageal cancer.
Lee JM; Cheng JW; Lin MT; Huang PM; Chen JS; Lee YC
World J Surg; 2011 Apr; 35(4):790-7. PubMed ID: 21327605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Robotic Esophagectomy Trends and Early Surgical Outcomes: The US Experience.
Khaitan PG; Vekstein AM; Thibault D; Kosinski A; Hartwig MG; Block M; Gaissert H; Wolf AS
Ann Thorac Surg; 2023 Mar; 115(3):710-717. PubMed ID: 36470561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparing Perioperative Mortality and Morbidity of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Nationwide Retrospective Analysis.
Sakamoto T; Fujiogi M; Matsui H; Fushimi K; Yasunaga H
Ann Surg; 2021 Aug; 274(2):324-330. PubMed ID: 31356263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Postoperative intensive care unit stay after minimally invasive esophagectomy shows large hospital variation. Results from the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit.
Voeten DM; van der Werf LR; Gisbertz SS; Ruurda JP; van Berge Henegouwen MI; van Hillegersberg R;
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Aug; 47(8):1961-1968. PubMed ID: 33485673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Minimally Invasive Versus open AbdominoThoracic Esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma (MIVATE) - study protocol for a randomized controlled trial DRKS00016773.
Nickel F; Probst P; Studier-Fischer A; Nienhüser H; Pauly J; Kowalewski KF; Weiterer S; Knebel P; Diener MK; Weigand MA; Büchler MW; Schmidt T; Müller-Stich BP
Trials; 2021 Jan; 22(1):41. PubMed ID: 33430937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of perioperative outcomes following open versus minimally invasive Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy at a single, high-volume centre.
Sihag S; Wright CD; Wain JC; Gaissert HA; Lanuti M; Allan JS; Mathisen DJ; Morse CR
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2012 Sep; 42(3):430-7. PubMed ID: 22345284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Long-term outcomes of robot-assisted versus minimally invasive esophagectomy in patients with thoracic esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched study.
Sakurai T; Hoshino A; Miyoshi K; Yamada E; Enomoto M; Mazaki J; Kuwabara H; Iwasaki K; Ota Y; Tachibana S; Hayashi Y; Ishizaki T; Nagakawa Y
World J Surg Oncol; 2024 Mar; 22(1):80. PubMed ID: 38504312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Major Postoperative Complications in Esophageal Cancer After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Compared With Open Esophagectomy: An Updated Meta-analysis.
Pu S; Chen H; Zhou C; Yu S; Liao X; Zhu L; He J; Wang B
J Surg Res; 2021 Jan; 257():554-571. PubMed ID: 32927322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
