These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38641480)

  • 1. Influence of scan extension and starting quadrant on the accuracy of four intraoral scanners for fabricating tooth-supported crowns.
    Revilla-León M; Gómez-Polo M; Barmak AB; Yilmaz B; Kois JC; Alonso Pérez-Barquero J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38641480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of different tooth preparation finishing procedures and immediate dentin sealing on the scanning accuracy of different intraoral scanners.
    Revilla-León M; Cascos-Sánchez R; Barmak AB; Kois JC; Gómez-Polo M
    J Dent; 2023 Mar; 130():104431. PubMed ID: 36682722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of six intraoral scanners for scanning complete-arch and 4-unit fixed partial dentures: An in vitro study.
    Diker B; Tak Ö
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Aug; 128(2):187-194. PubMed ID: 33558056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of splinting scan bodies on the trueness of complete arch digital implant scans with 5 different intraoral scanners.
    Azevedo L; Marques T; Karasan D; Fehmer V; Sailer I; Correia A; Gómez-Polo M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jul; 132(1):204-210. PubMed ID: 37537105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of maximum intercuspal position located by using four intraoral scanners and an artificial intelligence-based program.
    Revilla-León M; Fernández-Estevan L; Barmak AB; Kois JC; Alonso Pérez-Barquero J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38604907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of occlusal collision corrections completed by two intraoral scanners or a dental design program on the accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship.
    Revilla-León M; Gómez-Polo M; Barmak AB; Kois JC; Yilmaz B; Alonso Pérez-Barquero J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jul; 132(1):191-203. PubMed ID: 37365066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Trueness and precision of complete arch dentate digital models produced by intraoral and desktop scanners: An ex-vivo study.
    Vag J; Stevens CD; Badahman MH; Ludlow M; Sharp M; Brenes C; Mennito A; Renne W
    J Dent; 2023 Dec; 139():104764. PubMed ID: 37898433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Scanning accuracy and scanning area discrepancies of intraoral digital scans acquired at varying scanning distances and angulations among 4 different intraoral scanners.
    Button H; Kois JC; Barmak AB; Zeitler JM; Rutkunas V; Revilla-León M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 36872156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of connected and nonconnected calibrated frameworks on the accuracy of complete arch implant scans obtained by using four intraoral scanners, a desktop scanner, and a photogrammetry system.
    Revilla-León M; Barmak AB; Lanis A; Kois JC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38443245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differences in maxillomandibular relationship recorded at centric relation when using a conventional method, four intraoral scanners, and a jaw tracking system: A clinical study.
    Revilla-León M; Agustín-Panadero R; Zeitler JM; Barmak AB; Yilmaz B; Kois JC; Pérez-Barquero JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 36682896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of operator experience, scanner type, and scan size on 3D scans.
    Resende CCD; Barbosa TAQ; Moura GF; Tavares LDN; Rizzante FAP; George FM; Neves FDD; Mendonça G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):294-299. PubMed ID: 32115221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of ambient light conditions on the accuracy and scanning time of seven intraoral scanners in complete-arch implant scans.
    Ochoa-López G; Cascos R; Antonaya-Martín JL; Revilla-León M; Gómez-Polo M
    J Dent; 2022 Jun; 121():104138. PubMed ID: 35461973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship at centric relation position recorded by using 3 different intraoral scanners with or without an optical jaw tracking system: An in vivo pilot study.
    Revilla-León M; Fernández-Estevan L; Barmak AB; Kois JC; Pérez-Barquero JA
    J Dent; 2023 May; 132():104478. PubMed ID: 36889536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of different complete coverage onlay preparation designs and the intraoral scanner on the accuracy of digital scans.
    de Andrade GS; Luz JN; Tribst JPM; Chun EP; Bressane A; Borges ALS; Saavedra GSFA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1168-1177. PubMed ID: 35717209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of scan technology on the accuracy and speed of intraoral scanning systems for the edentulous maxilla: An in vitro study.
    Osman RB; Alharbi NM
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Dec; 32(9):821-828. PubMed ID: 36571837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of the dental arch and number of cutting-off and rescanning mesh holes on the accuracy of implant scans in partially edentulous situations.
    Gómez-Polo M; Immorlano MG; Cascos-Sánchez R; Ortega R; Barmak AB; Kois JC; Revilla-León M
    J Dent; 2023 Oct; 137():104667. PubMed ID: 37595865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing the accuracy of six intraoral scanners on prepared teeth and effect of scanning sequence.
    Diker B; Tak Ö
    J Adv Prosthodont; 2020 Oct; 12(5):299-306. PubMed ID: 33149851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intraoral digital scans-Part 1: Influence of ambient scanning light conditions on the accuracy (trueness and precision) of different intraoral scanners.
    Revilla-León M; Jiang P; Sadeghpour M; Piedra-Cascón W; Zandinejad A; Özcan M; Krishnamurthy VR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Sep; 124(3):372-378. PubMed ID: 31864638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Scan accuracy and time efficiency of different implant-supported fixed partial denture situations depending on the intraoral scanner and scanned area: An in vitro study.
    Donmez MB; Mathey A; Gäumann F; Mathey A; Yilmaz B; Abou-Ayash S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1198-1207. PubMed ID: 36868987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of interdental spaces and the palate on the accuracy of maxillary scans acquired using different intraoral scanners.
    Akl MA; Daifallah K; Pérez-Barquero JA; Barmak AB; Wee AG; Revilla-León M
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Dec; 32(S2):125-134. PubMed ID: 37591814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.