These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38642450)

  • 21. Exploring the personal and professional factors associated with student evaluations of tenure-track faculty.
    Murray D; Boothby C; Zhao H; Minik V; Bérubé N; Larivière V; Sugimoto CR
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0233515. PubMed ID: 32492028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Facial width-to-height ratio in a large sample of Commonwealth Games athletes.
    Kramer RS
    Evol Psychol; 2015 Feb; 13(1):197-209. PubMed ID: 25714799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Analysis of personality traits' correlation to facial width-to-height ratio (fWHR) and mandibular line angle based on 16 personality factor in Chinese college students.
    Lv H; Wang T; Zhang J; Liu Z; Dong J; Xie H; Yang Y; Xue P; Che Y; Han P
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(12):e0278201. PubMed ID: 36477722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. How components of facial width to height ratio differently contribute to the perception of social traits.
    Costa M; Lio G; Gomez A; Sirigu A
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0172739. PubMed ID: 28235081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. No evidence that facial width-to-height ratio (fWHR) is associated with women's sexual desire.
    Zhang W; Hahn AC; Cai Z; Lee AJ; Holzleitner IJ; DeBruine LM; Jones BC
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0200308. PubMed ID: 30020967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Facial structure is indicative of explicit support for prejudicial beliefs.
    Hehman E; Leitner JB; Deegan MP; Gaertner SL
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Mar; 24(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 23389425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Attractiveness Differentially Affects Direct Versus Indirect Face Evaluations in Two Cultures.
    Cassidy BS; Saribay SA; Yüksel H; Kleisner K
    Evol Psychol; 2023; 21(3):14747049231186119. PubMed ID: 37428141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Identifying significant predictors of student evaluations of faculty through hierarchical regression analysis.
    Radmacher SA; Martin DJ
    J Psychol; 2001 May; 135(3):259-68. PubMed ID: 11577968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sexually Dimorphic Faciometrics in Black Racial Groups From Early Adulthood to Late Middle Age.
    Robertson JM; Kingsley BE
    Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(4):1474704918811056. PubMed ID: 30458649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The facial width-to-height ratio determines interpersonal distance preferences in the observer.
    Lieberz KA; Windmann S; Geniole SN; McCormick CM; Mueller-Engelmann M; Gruener F; Bornefeld-Ettmann P; Steil R
    Aggress Behav; 2017 Sep; 43(5):460-470. PubMed ID: 28261811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Preference for leaders with high and low facial width-to-height ratios: moderating roles of political ideology and voting context.
    Banai B; Bačić M; Banai IP
    Curr Issues Personal Psychol; 2023; 11(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 38013826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Second to fourth digit ratio, testosterone and perceived male dominance.
    Neave N; Laing S; Fink B; Manning JT
    Proc Biol Sci; 2003 Oct; 270(1529):2167-72. PubMed ID: 14561281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The face-time continuum: lifespan changes in facial width-to-height ratio impact aging-associated perceptions.
    Hehman E; Leitner JB; Freeman JB
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2014 Dec; 40(12):1624-36. PubMed ID: 25278108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Increased facial width-to-height ratio and perceived dominance in the faces of the UK's leading business leaders.
    Alrajih S; Ward J
    Br J Psychol; 2014 May; 105(2):153-61. PubMed ID: 24754804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Social status moderates the relationship between facial structure and aggression.
    Goetz SM; Shattuck KS; Miller RM; Campbell JA; Lozoya E; Weisfeld GE; Carré JM
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Nov; 24(11):2329-34. PubMed ID: 24068116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The face of debt: Facial width-to-height ratios and regional debt in China.
    Zhang K; Ma T; Wan X
    Heliyon; 2023 May; 9(5):e15722. PubMed ID: 37180888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. "Facing humanness: Facial width-to-height ratio predicts ascriptions of humanity": Correction to Deska, Lloyd, and Hugenberg (2017).
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2018 Jan; 114(1):94. PubMed ID: 29293019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Within-person variability in men's facial width-to-height ratio.
    Kramer RS
    PeerJ; 2016; 4():e1801. PubMed ID: 26989634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Facial Width-to-Height Ratio Does Not Predict Self-Reported Behavioral Tendencies.
    Kosinski M
    Psychol Sci; 2017 Nov; 28(11):1675-1682. PubMed ID: 28976810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Work stress among university teachers: gender and position differences.
    Slišković A; Maslić Seršić D
    Arh Hig Rada Toksikol; 2011 Dec; 62(4):299-307. PubMed ID: 22202463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.