These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38642512)
1. Variability of treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer: How French multidisciplinary teams follow European guidelines? Sabah J; Menoux I; Eberst L; Lodi M; Gantzer J; Azais H; El Hajj H; Balaya V; Babin G; Espenel S; Dabi Y; Kissel M; Phuong Lien T; Angeles MA; Margueritte F; Deluche E; Marouk A; Le Borgne P; Apithy MS; Laas-Faron E; Akladios C; Lecointre L; Eur J Surg Oncol; 2024 Jun; 50(6):108281. PubMed ID: 38642512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Para-aortic lymph node staging in grade IB2 and above cervical cancers: Comparison of 18FDG PET-CT with para-aortic lymphadenectomy, using data from the Côte d'Or gynaecological cancer registry from 2003 to 2016]. Carré A; Sellier J; Kamga AM; Dabakuyo S; Rouffiac M; Coutant C Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2021 Sep; 49(9):677-683. PubMed ID: 33484900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robot-assisted laparoscopic transperitoneal infrarenal lymphadenectomy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer by single docking: Do we need a backup procedure? Gucer F; Misirlioglu S; Ceydeli N; Taskiran C J Robot Surg; 2018 Mar; 12(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 28255734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quality of training in cervical cancer radical surgery: a survey from the European Network of Young Gynaecologic Oncologists (ENYGO). Bizzarri N; Pletnev A; Razumova Z; Zalewski K; Theofanakis C; Selcuk I; Nikolova T; Lanner M; Gómez-Hidalgo NR; Kacperczyk-Bartnik J; Querleu D; Cibula D; Verheijen RHM; Fagotti A Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2022 Apr; 32(4):494-501. PubMed ID: 34992130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy versus para-aortic lymphadenectomy alone for locally advanced FIGO stage IB2 to IIB cervical cancer using a propensity score matching analysis: Results from the FRANCOGYN study group. Bendifallah S; de Foucher T; Ouldamer L; Bricou A; Lavoue V; Varinot J; Canlorbe G; Carcopino X; Raimond E; Huguet F; Graesslin O; Touboul C; Collinet P; Huchon C; Daraï E; Ballester M; Eur J Surg Oncol; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1921-1928. PubMed ID: 30213717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Survival effect of laparoscopic para-aortic staging in locally advanced cervical cancer: a retrospective cohort analysis. Pomel C; Martinez A; Bourgin C; Beguinot M; Benoit C; Naik R; Dauplat J; Lebouedec G; Ferron G BJOG; 2017 Jun; 124(7):1089-1094. PubMed ID: 28128517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of global treatment guidelines for locally advanced cervical cancer to optimize best care practices: A systematic and scoping review. Pujade-Lauraine E; Tan DSP; Leary A; Mirza MR; Enomoto T; Takyar J; Nunes AT; Chagüi JDH; Paskow MJ; Monk BJ Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Nov; 167(2):360-372. PubMed ID: 36096973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interest of para-aortic lymphadenectomy for locally advanced cervical cancer in the era of PET scanning. Khebbeb S; Rathat G; Serrand C; Bourdon A; Ferrer C; Duraes M Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 May; 272():234-239. PubMed ID: 35397374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Added value of para-aortic surgical staging compared to De Cuypere M; Lovinfosse P; Goffin F; Gennigens C; Rovira R; Duch J; Fastrez M; Gebhart G; Squifflet JL; Luyckx M; Charaf G; Crener K; Buxant F; Bucella D; Jouret M; Hustinx R; Kridelka F Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 May; 46(5):883-887. PubMed ID: 31784203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laparoscopic extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in the staging of locally advanced cervical cancer: is it a feasible procedure at a peripheral center? Benito V; Lubrano A; Arencibia O; Andújar M; Pinar B; Medina N; Falcón JM; Falcón O Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Feb; 22(2):332-6. PubMed ID: 22198268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Practice patterns and guideline adherence of medical oncologists in managing patients with early breast cancer. Foster JA; Abdolrasulnia M; Doroodchi H; McClure J; Casebeer L J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2009 Jul; 7(7):697-706. PubMed ID: 19635225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of 18-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography in the pretherapeutic detection of occult para-aortic node involvement in patients with a locally advanced cervical carcinoma. Leblanc E; Gauthier H; Querleu D; Ferron G; Zerdoud S; Morice P; Uzan C; Lumbroso S; Lecuru F; Bats AS; Ghazzar N; Bannier M; Houvenaeghel G; Brenot-Rossi I; Narducci F Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Aug; 18(8):2302-9. PubMed ID: 21347790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Should the Presence of Metastatic Para-Aortic Lymph Nodes in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Lead to More Aggressive Treatment Strategies? Benito V; Carballo S; Silva P; Esparza M; Arencibia O; Federico M; Andújar M; Mori M; Medina N; Lubrano A J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(4):609-616. PubMed ID: 28161495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sentinel lymph node mapping in endometrial and cervical cancer: a survey of practices and attitudes in gynecologic oncologists. Chambers LM; Vargas R; Michener CM J Gynecol Oncol; 2019 May; 30(3):e35. PubMed ID: 30887757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of morbidity and clinical implications of laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy in a continuous series of 98 patients with advanced-stage cervical cancer and negative PET-CT imaging in the para-aortic area. Uzan C; Souadka A; Gouy S; Debaere T; Duclos J; Lumbroso J; Haie-Meder C; Morice P Oncologist; 2011; 16(7):1021-7. PubMed ID: 21659610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of ultrasound in primary workup of cervical cancer staging (ESGO, ESTRO, ESP cervical cancer guidelines). Fischerová D; Cibula D Ceska Gynekol; 2019; 84(1):40-48. PubMed ID: 31213057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Para-aortic workup in locally advanced cervical cancer: heterogeneity is still the rule. Results from a retrospective multicenter study. Chantalat E; Vidal F; Leguevaque P; Lepage B; Lambaudie E; Hebert T; Motton S Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 May; 293(5):1081-6. PubMed ID: 26385726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Current FIGO Staging for Carcinoma of the Cervix Uteri and Treatment of Particular Stages. Sehnal B; Kmoníčková E; Sláma J; Tomancová V; Zikán M Klin Onkol; 2019; 32(3):224-231. PubMed ID: 31216857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]