These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3864372)

  • 1. Nonextraction treatment of Class II, Division 1 malocclusions.
    Arvystas MG
    Am J Orthod; 1985 Nov; 88(5):380-95. PubMed ID: 3864372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stability and relapse of maxillary anterior crowding treatment in class I and class II Division 1 malocclusions.
    Quaglio CL; de Freitas KM; de Freitas MR; Janson G; Henriques JF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jun; 139(6):768-74. PubMed ID: 21640883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nonextraction treatment of severe Class II, Division 2 malocclusions. Part 1.
    Arvystas MG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Jun; 97(6):510-21. PubMed ID: 2353681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mandibular changes in persons with untreated and treated Class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Bishara SE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Jun; 113(6):661-73. PubMed ID: 9637570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A cephalometric appraisal of edgewise Class II nonextraction treatment with extraoral force.
    Cangialosi TJ; Meistrell ME; Leung MA; Ko JY
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1988 Apr; 93(4):315-24. PubMed ID: 3162641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Class II malocclusion correction: an American board of orthodontics case.
    Snyder RJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Oct; 116(4):424-9. PubMed ID: 10511670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Early dentofacial features of Class II malocclusion: a longitudinal study from the deciduous through the mixed dentition.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L; McNamara JA; Tollaro I
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 May; 111(5):502-9. PubMed ID: 9155809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A cephalometric study to compare the effects of cervical traction and Andresen therapy in the treatment of class II division 1 malocclusion. Part 2--Dentoalveolar changes.
    Derringer K
    Br J Orthod; 1990 May; 17(2):89-99. PubMed ID: 2357464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of timing on the outcomes of 1-phase nonextraction therapy of Class II malocclusion.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L; Kim LH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Oct; 136(4):501-9. PubMed ID: 19815151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intensive treatment of severe Class II malocclusions with a headgear-Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition.
    Wieslander L
    Am J Orthod; 1984 Jul; 86(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 6588755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tooth size discrepancies and arch parameters among different malocclusions in a Jordanian sample.
    Al-Khateeb SN; Abu Alhaija ES
    Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):459-65. PubMed ID: 16637727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nonextraction treatment started in the mixed dentition. An American Board of Orthodontics case report.
    Nachbar AS
    Am J Orthod; 1980 Jan; 77(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 6928090
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A long-term comparison of nonextraction and premolar extraction edgewise therapy in "borderline" Class II patients.
    Paquette DE; Beattie JR; Johnston LE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Jul; 102(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 1626523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Class II Division 1 Malocclusion Treated with a Cervical-Pull Headgear: A Case Report.
    Shah AH
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2016; 27(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 27319037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Severe unilateral scissors-bite with a constricted mandibular arch: Bite turbos and extra-alveolar bone screws in the infrazygomatic crests and mandibular buccal shelf.
    Lee SA; Chang CCH; Roberts WE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Oct; 154(4):554-569. PubMed ID: 30268266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the dental arch changes in patients with different malocclusions.
    Singh DP; Garg AK; Singh SP; Krishna Nayak US; Gupta M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2014; 25(5):623-9. PubMed ID: 25511063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of extraction and nonextraction treatment on class I and class II subjects.
    Basciftci FA; Usumez S
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Feb; 73(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 12607853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Distal movement of buccal segments with the "en masse" removable appliance: its value in treating patients with mild Class II, Division 1 malocclusion. Part II: the model measuring system and results.
    Orton HS; Battagel JM; Ferguson R; Ferman AM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Apr; 109(4):379-85. PubMed ID: 8638579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A cephalometric appraisal of nonextraction Begg treatment of Class II malocclusions.
    Meistrell ME; Cangialosi TJ; Lopez JE; Cabral-Angeles A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1986 Oct; 90(4):286-95. PubMed ID: 3464190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Space planning sensitivity and specificity: Royal London Space Planning and Korkhaus Analyses.
    Dause R; Cobourne M; McDonald F
    Aust Orthod J; 2010 May; 26(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 20575199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.