These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3864374)

  • 41. Correlation Between Cephalometric Measures and End-of-Treatment Facial Attractiveness.
    Yu XN; Bai D; Feng X; Liu YH; Chen WJ; Li S; Han GL; Jiang RP; Xu TM
    J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Mar; 27(2):405-9. PubMed ID: 26872281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Regional facial asymmetries and attractiveness of the face.
    Kaipainen AE; Sieber KR; Nada RM; Maal TJ; Katsaros C; Fudalej PS
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Dec; 38(6):602-608. PubMed ID: 26666568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Role of facial attractiveness in patients with slight-to-borderline treatment need according to the Aesthetic Component of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need as judged by eye tracking.
    Johnson EK; Fields HW; Beck FM; Firestone AR; Rosenstiel SF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Feb; 151(2):297-310. PubMed ID: 28153159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Myofunctional therapy and facial cosmesis: position paper.
    Case JL
    Int J Orofacial Myology; 1982 Jul; 8(2):10-2. PubMed ID: 6957404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Preliminary evaluation of an illustrated scale for rating dental attractiveness.
    Evans R; Shaw W
    Eur J Orthod; 1987 Nov; 9(4):314-8. PubMed ID: 3480231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Psychosocial predictors and sequelae of facial change.
    Kiyak A
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1992 Jun; 58(6):459-62. PubMed ID: 1633578
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Are ratings of dentofacial attractiveness influenced by dentofacial midline discrepancies?
    Shyagali TR; Chandralekha B; Bhayya DP; Kumar S; Balasubramanyam G
    Aust Orthod J; 2008 Nov; 24(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 19113072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The influence of dental to facial midline discrepancies on dental attractiveness ratings.
    Johnston CD; Burden DJ; Stevenson MR
    Eur J Orthod; 1999 Oct; 21(5):517-22. PubMed ID: 10565092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Variables discriminating individuals who seek orthodontic treatment.
    Albino JE; Cunat JJ; Fox RN; Lewis EA; Slakter MJ; Tedesco LA
    J Dent Res; 1981 Sep; 60(9):1661-7. PubMed ID: 6943159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Panel perception of facial attractiveness.
    Roberts-Harry D; Stephens CD
    Br J Orthod; 1991 May; 18(2):152-3. PubMed ID: 1911697
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Oral health status in the United States: prevalence of malocclusion.
    McLain JB; Proffitt WR
    J Dent Educ; 1985 Jun; 49(6):386-97. PubMed ID: 3859517
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Development of a questionnaire for assessment of the psychosocial impact of dental aesthetics in young adults.
    Klages U; Claus N; Wehrbein H; Zentner A
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Apr; 28(2):103-11. PubMed ID: 16257989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Aesthetic perception and factors associated with dentofacial midline awareness.
    Guo C; Zhou C; Quan C; Wang Y; Fan M; Wang W; Bao B
    Aust Orthod J; 2013 May; 29(1):96-104. PubMed ID: 23785943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Validity of the Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics Questionnaire for use on Brazilian adolescents.
    Santos PM; Gonçalves AR; Marega T
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2016 Jun; 21(3):67-72. PubMed ID: 27409655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the Orthognathic Quality of Life Questionnaire.
    Gava EC; Miguel JA; de Araújo AM; de Oliveira BH
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Oct; 71(10):1762.e1-8. PubMed ID: 24040950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Influence of lips on the perception of malocclusion.
    Scott CR; Goonewardene MS; Murray K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Aug; 130(2):152-62. PubMed ID: 16905058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The effect of malocclusion and self-perceived aesthetics on the self-esteem of a sample of Jordanian adolescents.
    Badran SA
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Dec; 32(6):638-44. PubMed ID: 20403957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A method to obtain maximum profile improvement for gross facial disharmonies.
    Closson DA
    Angle Orthod; 1977 Jul; 47(3):206-9. PubMed ID: 268951
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The ranking of facial attractiveness.
    Roberts-Harry DP; Hathorn IS; Stephens CD
    Eur J Orthod; 1992 Dec; 14(6):483-8. PubMed ID: 1486934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Self-perception of malocclusion among adolescents.
    Burden DJ; Pine CM
    Community Dent Health; 1995 Jun; 12(2):89-92. PubMed ID: 7648417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.