BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38646273)

  • 21. Preanalytical Errors in Clinical Laboratory Testing at a Glance: Source and Control Measures.
    Nordin N; Ab Rahim SN; Wan Omar WFA; Zulkarnain S; Sinha S; Kumar S; Haque M
    Cureus; 2024 Mar; 16(3):e57243. PubMed ID: 38559530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Analysis of laboratory sample rejections in the pre-analytical stage at an oncology center.
    Bhat V; Tiwari M; Chavan P; Kelkar R
    Clin Chim Acta; 2012 Aug; 413(15-16):1203-6. PubMed ID: 22507083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Modified Ultrafast Papanicolaou Stain in Ultrasound Guided FNAC of Intra-abdominal Lesions.
    Kamalkant Shastri S; Joshi A
    Iran J Pathol; 2020; 15(2):66-74. PubMed ID: 32215021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Pre-analytical quality in fluid samples cytopathology: Results of a survey from the French Society of Clinical Cytology].
    Courtade-Saïdi M; Fleury Feith J;
    Ann Pathol; 2015 Oct; 35(5):378-86. PubMed ID: 26372499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Assessment of hematology laboratory performance in the total testing process using quality indicators and sigma metrics in the northwest of Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study.
    Berta DM; Grima M; Melku M; Adane T; Chane E; Teketelew BB; Yalew A
    Health Sci Rep; 2024 Jan; 7(1):e1833. PubMed ID: 38264158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Quality Measures in Pre-Analytical Phase of Tissue Processing: Understanding Its Value in Histopathology.
    Rao S; Masilamani S; Sundaram S; Duvuru P; Swaminathan R
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2016 Jan; 10(1):EC07-11. PubMed ID: 26894071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Specimen rejection in laboratory medicine: Necessary for patient safety?
    Dikmen ZG; Pinar A; Akbiyik F
    Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2015; 25(3):377-85. PubMed ID: 26527231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Pre-analytical workstations: a tool for reducing laboratory errors.
    Da Rin G
    Clin Chim Acta; 2009 Jun; 404(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 19302988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Improving laboratory results turnaround time by reducing pre analytical phase.
    Khalifa M; Khalid P
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2014; 202():71-4. PubMed ID: 25000018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. External quality assessment of medical laboratories in Croatia: preliminary evaluation of post-analytical laboratory testing.
    Krleza JL; Dorotic A; Grzunov A
    Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2017 Feb; 27(1):144-152. PubMed ID: 28392737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Health technology assessment report: Computer-assisted Pap test for cervical cancer screening].
    Della Palma P; Moresco L; Giorgi Rossi P
    Epidemiol Prev; 2012; 36(5 Suppl 3):e1-43. PubMed ID: 23139174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The impact of laboratory staff training workshops on coagulation specimen rejection rates.
    du Toit M; Chapanduka ZC; Zemlin AE
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(6):e0268764. PubMed ID: 35657929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Impact of Educational Activities in Reducing Pre-Analytical Laboratory Errors: A quality initiative.
    Al-Ghaithi H; Pathare A; Al-Mamari S; Villacrucis R; Fawaz N; Alkindi S
    Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J; 2017 Aug; 17(3):e309-e313. PubMed ID: 29062553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The utility of cytology in the diagnosis of adenocarcinoma lung: A tertiary care center study.
    Shukla S; Malhotra KP; Husain N; Gupta A; Anand N
    J Cytol; 2015; 32(3):159-64. PubMed ID: 26729975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of electronic ordering on pre-analytical errors in primary care.
    Turner HE; Deans KA; Kite A; Croal BL
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2013 Sep; 50(Pt 5):485-8. PubMed ID: 23897109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Three years' experience of quality monitoring program on pre-analytical errors in china.
    Kang F; Li W; Xia X; Shan Z
    J Clin Lab Anal; 2021 Mar; 35(3):e23699. PubMed ID: 33458892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Monitoring and Root Cause Analysis of Clinical Biochemistry Turnaround Time at a Tertiary Care Institute.
    Prasad P; Kumar R; Kumar S; Sinha P
    Cureus; 2023 Jun; 15(6):e39821. PubMed ID: 37397669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Analytical and Post Analytical Phase of an ISO 15189:2012 Certified Cytopathology Laboratory-A Five Year Institutional Experience.
    Chandra S; Kusum A; Gaur DS; Chandra H
    J Cytol; 2022; 39(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 35341112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Pre-analytical factors that influence the interpretation of prothrombin time in the clinical laboratory: one year experience in a super speciality hospital in India.
    Goswami B; Tayal D; Chawla R; Mallika V
    Clin Chim Acta; 2009 Dec; 410(1-2):93-4. PubMed ID: 19758568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Point-of-Care International Normalized Ratio (INR) Monitoring Devices for Patients on Long-term Oral Anticoagulation Therapy: An Evidence-Based Analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2009; 9(12):1-114. PubMed ID: 23074516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.