144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38646282)
1. Comparison of Medical Tape Performance Using Skin Response Quantitative Measurements on Healthy Volunteers.
Turnbull MJ; Grigsby I; Unertl K; Sokol K; Nordby T; Liu C; Bailey A; Spiewak B; Smith G; McNulty AK
Cureus; 2024 Mar; 16(3):e56548. PubMed ID: 38646282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A randomized and controlled comparison of gentleness of 2 medical adhesive tapes in healthy human subjects.
Grove GL; Zerweck CR; Houser TP; Smith GE; Koski NI
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2013; 40(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 23202590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adhesives for medical application - Peel strength testing and evaluation of biophysical skin response.
Mbithi F; Worsley PR
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Dec; 148():106168. PubMed ID: 37847959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Physical and physiological effects of stratum corneum tape stripping.
Bashir SJ; Chew AL; Anigbogu A; Dreher F; Maibach HI
Skin Res Technol; 2001 Feb; 7(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 11301640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Properties of pressure-sensitive adhesive tapes with soft adhesives to human skin and their mechanism.
Tokumura F; Homma T; Tomiya T; Kobayashi Y; Matsuda T
Skin Res Technol; 2007 May; 13(2):211-6. PubMed ID: 17374065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Medical Adhesive Tapes in Patients at Risk of Facial Skin Trauma under Anesthesia.
Zeng LA; Lie SA; Chong SY
Anesthesiol Res Pract; 2016; 2016():4878246. PubMed ID: 27382368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A temperature-sensitive, high-adhesion medical tape: a comparative, single-blind clinical trial.
Swanson S; Luu V; Smith R; Gross A; Tudor J; MacKenzie D; Taroc AM; Gow KW; Nelson LY; Seibel EJ
J Wound Care; 2023 Oct; 32(10):665-675. PubMed ID: 37830828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Safety and efficacy of silicone tape for indwelling urinary catheter fixation in intensive care patients-A randomized clinical trial.
de Paula FM; Frota OP; Ruiz JS; Braulio IC; do Nascimento Gonçalves FC; Ferreira-Júnior MA; Sonobe HM; Ferreira DN; Pompeo CM; de Sousa AFL
Nurs Crit Care; 2024 Mar; 29(2):347-356. PubMed ID: 37264262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Acute barrier disruption by adhesive tapes is influenced by pressure, time and anatomical location: integrity and cohesion assessed by sequential tape stripping. A randomized, controlled study.
Breternitz M; Flach M; Prässler J; Elsner P; Fluhr JW
Br J Dermatol; 2007 Feb; 156(2):231-40. PubMed ID: 17223861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A proof-of-principle study comparing barrier function and cell morphology in face and body skin.
Gorcea M; Lane ME; Moore DJ
Int J Cosmet Sci; 2019 Dec; 41(6):613-616. PubMed ID: 31389021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Skin irritation due to repetitive application of adhesive tape: the influence of adhesive strength and seasonal variability.
Tokumura F; Umekage K; Sado M; Otsuka S; Suda S; Taniguchi M; Yamori A; Nakamura A; Kawai J; Oka K
Skin Res Technol; 2005 May; 11(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 15807807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of a new silicone adhesive tape among clinicians caring for patients with fragile or at-risk skin.
Manriquez S; Loperfido B; Smith G
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2014 Apr; 27(4):163-70. PubMed ID: 24637650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Characteristic differences in barrier and hygroscopic properties between normal and cosmetic dry skin. I. Enhanced barrier analysis with sequential tape-stripping.
Lu N; Chandar P; Tempesta D; Vincent C; Bajor J; McGuiness H
Int J Cosmet Sci; 2014 Apr; 36(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 24397786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bond strength of double-sided adhesive tapes used for facial prostheses.
Polyzois GL
Spec Care Dentist; 1994; 14(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 8042138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Removal of adhesive wound dressing and its effects on the stratum corneum of the skin: comparison of eight different adhesive wound dressings.
Matsumura H; Imai R; Ahmatjan N; Ida Y; Gondo M; Shibata D; Wanatabe K
Int Wound J; 2014 Feb; 11(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 22883604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Randomized comparison of a silicone tape and a paper tape for gentleness in healthy children.
Grove GL; Zerweck CR; Ekholm BP; Smith GE; Koski NI
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2014; 41(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 24240641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An objective comparison of two pulse oximetry sensors with different adhesive systems on healthy human volunteers based on biophysical assessments.
Grove G; Houser T; Dove J; Moody D
Skin Res Technol; 2023 Jan; 29(1):e13212. PubMed ID: 36329598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The number of stratum corneum cell layers correlates with the pseudo-absorption of the corneocytes.
Jacobi U; Kaiser M; Richter H; Audring H; Sterry W; Lademann J
Skin Pharmacol Physiol; 2005; 18(4):175-9. PubMed ID: 15908757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluating the Irritant Factors of Silicone and Hydrocolloid Skin Contact Adhesives Using Trans-Epidermal Water Loss, Protein Stripping, Erythema, and Ease of Removal.
Dyson E; Sikkink S; Nocita D; Twigg P; Westgate G; Swift T
ACS Appl Bio Mater; 2024 Jan; 7(1):284-296. PubMed ID: 38150300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stratum corneum adhesive tape stripping: influence of anatomical site, application pressure, duration and removal.
Löffler H; Dreher F; Maibach HI
Br J Dermatol; 2004 Oct; 151(4):746-52. PubMed ID: 15491413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
