These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38646282)
1. Comparison of Medical Tape Performance Using Skin Response Quantitative Measurements on Healthy Volunteers. Turnbull MJ; Grigsby I; Unertl K; Sokol K; Nordby T; Liu C; Bailey A; Spiewak B; Smith G; McNulty AK Cureus; 2024 Mar; 16(3):e56548. PubMed ID: 38646282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A randomized and controlled comparison of gentleness of 2 medical adhesive tapes in healthy human subjects. Grove GL; Zerweck CR; Houser TP; Smith GE; Koski NI J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2013; 40(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 23202590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adhesives for medical application - Peel strength testing and evaluation of biophysical skin response. Mbithi F; Worsley PR J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Dec; 148():106168. PubMed ID: 37847959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Physical and physiological effects of stratum corneum tape stripping. Bashir SJ; Chew AL; Anigbogu A; Dreher F; Maibach HI Skin Res Technol; 2001 Feb; 7(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 11301640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Properties of pressure-sensitive adhesive tapes with soft adhesives to human skin and their mechanism. Tokumura F; Homma T; Tomiya T; Kobayashi Y; Matsuda T Skin Res Technol; 2007 May; 13(2):211-6. PubMed ID: 17374065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Medical Adhesive Tapes in Patients at Risk of Facial Skin Trauma under Anesthesia. Zeng LA; Lie SA; Chong SY Anesthesiol Res Pract; 2016; 2016():4878246. PubMed ID: 27382368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A temperature-sensitive, high-adhesion medical tape: a comparative, single-blind clinical trial. Swanson S; Luu V; Smith R; Gross A; Tudor J; MacKenzie D; Taroc AM; Gow KW; Nelson LY; Seibel EJ J Wound Care; 2023 Oct; 32(10):665-675. PubMed ID: 37830828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Safety and efficacy of silicone tape for indwelling urinary catheter fixation in intensive care patients-A randomized clinical trial. de Paula FM; Frota OP; Ruiz JS; Braulio IC; do Nascimento Gonçalves FC; Ferreira-Júnior MA; Sonobe HM; Ferreira DN; Pompeo CM; de Sousa AFL Nurs Crit Care; 2024 Mar; 29(2):347-356. PubMed ID: 37264262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Acute barrier disruption by adhesive tapes is influenced by pressure, time and anatomical location: integrity and cohesion assessed by sequential tape stripping. A randomized, controlled study. Breternitz M; Flach M; Prässler J; Elsner P; Fluhr JW Br J Dermatol; 2007 Feb; 156(2):231-40. PubMed ID: 17223861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A proof-of-principle study comparing barrier function and cell morphology in face and body skin. Gorcea M; Lane ME; Moore DJ Int J Cosmet Sci; 2019 Dec; 41(6):613-616. PubMed ID: 31389021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Skin irritation due to repetitive application of adhesive tape: the influence of adhesive strength and seasonal variability. Tokumura F; Umekage K; Sado M; Otsuka S; Suda S; Taniguchi M; Yamori A; Nakamura A; Kawai J; Oka K Skin Res Technol; 2005 May; 11(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 15807807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of a new silicone adhesive tape among clinicians caring for patients with fragile or at-risk skin. Manriquez S; Loperfido B; Smith G Adv Skin Wound Care; 2014 Apr; 27(4):163-70. PubMed ID: 24637650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Characteristic differences in barrier and hygroscopic properties between normal and cosmetic dry skin. I. Enhanced barrier analysis with sequential tape-stripping. Lu N; Chandar P; Tempesta D; Vincent C; Bajor J; McGuiness H Int J Cosmet Sci; 2014 Apr; 36(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 24397786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bond strength of double-sided adhesive tapes used for facial prostheses. Polyzois GL Spec Care Dentist; 1994; 14(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 8042138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Removal of adhesive wound dressing and its effects on the stratum corneum of the skin: comparison of eight different adhesive wound dressings. Matsumura H; Imai R; Ahmatjan N; Ida Y; Gondo M; Shibata D; Wanatabe K Int Wound J; 2014 Feb; 11(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 22883604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Randomized comparison of a silicone tape and a paper tape for gentleness in healthy children. Grove GL; Zerweck CR; Ekholm BP; Smith GE; Koski NI J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2014; 41(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 24240641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An objective comparison of two pulse oximetry sensors with different adhesive systems on healthy human volunteers based on biophysical assessments. Grove G; Houser T; Dove J; Moody D Skin Res Technol; 2023 Jan; 29(1):e13212. PubMed ID: 36329598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The number of stratum corneum cell layers correlates with the pseudo-absorption of the corneocytes. Jacobi U; Kaiser M; Richter H; Audring H; Sterry W; Lademann J Skin Pharmacol Physiol; 2005; 18(4):175-9. PubMed ID: 15908757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluating the Irritant Factors of Silicone and Hydrocolloid Skin Contact Adhesives Using Trans-Epidermal Water Loss, Protein Stripping, Erythema, and Ease of Removal. Dyson E; Sikkink S; Nocita D; Twigg P; Westgate G; Swift T ACS Appl Bio Mater; 2024 Jan; 7(1):284-296. PubMed ID: 38150300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]