BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38647440)

  • 1. Intergroup processes and the happy face advantage: How social categories influence emotion categorization.
    Martin D; Hutchison J; Konopka AE; Dallimore CJ; Slessor G; Swainson R
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2024 Mar; 126(3):390-412. PubMed ID: 38647440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. You look pretty happy: Attractiveness moderates emotion perception.
    Lindeberg S; Craig BM; Lipp OV
    Emotion; 2019 Sep; 19(6):1070-1080. PubMed ID: 30234330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Affective divergence: automatic responses to others' emotions depend on group membership.
    Weisbuch M; Ambady N
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Nov; 95(5):1063-79. PubMed ID: 18954194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of poser race on the happy categorization advantage depends on stimulus type, set size, and presentation duration.
    Craig BM; Mallan KM; Lipp OV
    Emotion; 2012 Dec; 12(6):1303-14. PubMed ID: 22642347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Facial race and sex cues have a comparable influence on emotion recognition in Chinese and Australian participants.
    Craig BM; Zhang J; Lipp OV
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Oct; 79(7):2212-2223. PubMed ID: 28681183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mere social categorization modulates identification of facial expressions of emotion.
    Young SG; Hugenberg K
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2010 Dec; 99(6):964-77. PubMed ID: 20919774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perceiving happiness in an intergroup context: The role of race and attention to the eyes in differentiating between true and false smiles.
    Friesen JP; Kawakami K; Vingilis-Jaremko L; Caprara R; Sidhu DM; Williams A; Hugenberg K; Rodríguez-Bailón R; Cañadas E; Niedenthal P
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2019 Mar; 116(3):375-395. PubMed ID: 30614725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Categorising intersectional targets: An "either/and" approach to race- and gender-emotion congruity.
    Smith JS; LaFrance M; Dovidio JF
    Cogn Emot; 2017 Jan; 31(1):83-97. PubMed ID: 26371750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sorting out emotions: How labels influence emotion categorization.
    Price GF; Ogren M; Sandhofer CM
    Dev Psychol; 2022 Sep; 58(9):1665-1675. PubMed ID: 35653758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sharing joy increases joy: Group membership modulates emotional perception of facial expressions.
    Lee J; Lim SL; Lee D
    Emotion; 2022 Feb; 22(1):153-166. PubMed ID: 35007118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rapid visual perception of interracial crowds: Racial category learning from emotional segregation.
    Lamer SA; Sweeny TD; Dyer ML; Weisbuch M
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 May; 147(5):683-701. PubMed ID: 29745711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Seeing no pain: Assessing the generalizability of racial bias in pain perception.
    Mende-Siedlecki P; Lin J; Ferron S; Gibbons C; Drain A; Goharzad A
    Emotion; 2021 Aug; 21(5):932-950. PubMed ID: 33661666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of social category cues on the happy categorisation advantage depends on expression valence.
    Craig BM; Koch S; Lipp OV
    Cogn Emot; 2017 Nov; 31(7):1493-1501. PubMed ID: 27499098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An error in the analysis of "An eye for the I".
    Correll J; Hudson SM
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2020 Nov; 119(5):1030-1036. PubMed ID: 33090831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detecting and categorizing fleeting emotions in faces.
    Sweeny TD; Suzuki S; Grabowecky M; Paller KA
    Emotion; 2013 Feb; 13(1):76-91. PubMed ID: 22866885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Social categorization and the perception of facial affect: target race moderates the response latency advantage for happy faces.
    Hugenberg K
    Emotion; 2005 Sep; 5(3):267-76. PubMed ID: 16187863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bodily cues of sex and emotion can interact symmetrically: Evidence from simple categorization and the garner paradigm.
    Craig BM; Lipp OV
    Emotion; 2023 Dec; 23(8):2385-2398. PubMed ID: 37126043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Emotional expressions reinstate recognition of other-race faces in infants following perceptual narrowing.
    Quinn PC; Lee K; Pascalis O; Xiao NG
    Dev Psychol; 2020 Jan; 56(1):15-27. PubMed ID: 31789529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ambiguous at the second sight: Mixed facial expressions trigger late electrophysiological responses linked to lower social impressions.
    Kaminska OK; Magnuski M; Olszanowski M; Gola M; Brzezicka A; Winkielman P
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2020 Apr; 20(2):441-454. PubMed ID: 32166625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of facial sex cues on emotional expression categorization is not fixed.
    Craig BM; Lipp OV
    Emotion; 2017 Feb; 17(1):28-39. PubMed ID: 27379894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.