190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38649544)
1. The role of urology and radiology in prostate biopsy: current trends and future perspectives.
Mac Curtain BM; Temperley HC; Kelly JAO; Ryan J; Qian W; O'Sullivan N; Breen KJ; Mc Carthy CJ; Brennan I; Davis NF
World J Urol; 2024 Apr; 42(1):249. PubMed ID: 38649544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The eternal enigma in prostatic biopsy access route.
Fabiani A; Principi E; Filosa A; Servi L
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2017 Oct; 89(3):245-246. PubMed ID: 28969413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsy in Patients with a Prior Negative Biopsy: A Consensus Statement by AUA and SAR.
Rosenkrantz AB; Verma S; Choyke P; Eberhardt SC; Eggener SE; Gaitonde K; Haider MA; Margolis DJ; Marks LS; Pinto P; Sonn GA; Taneja SS
J Urol; 2016 Dec; 196(6):1613-1618. PubMed ID: 27320841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Detection of Prostate Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Prostate Biopsies is Superior with the Transperineal vs the Transrectal Approach. A European Association of Urology-Young Academic Urologists Prostate Cancer Working Group Multi-Institutional Study.
Zattoni F; Marra G; Kasivisvanathan V; Grummet J; Nandurkar R; Ploussard G; Olivier J; Chiu PK; Valerio M; Gontero P; Guo H; Zhuang J; Barletta F; Leni R; Frydenberg M; Moon D; Hanegbi U; Landaumailto A; Snow R; Apfelbeck M; Kretschmer A; van den Bergh R; Novara G; Briganti A; Dal Moro F; Gandaglia G
J Urol; 2022 Oct; 208(4):830-837. PubMed ID: 36082555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The urologist's learning curve of "in-bore" magnetic resonance-guided prostate biopsy.
Rosenzweig B; Drori T; Raz O; Goldinger G; Shlomai G; Zilberman DE; Shechtman M; Ramon J; Dotan ZA; Portnoy O
BMC Urol; 2021 Dec; 21(1):169. PubMed ID: 34872545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Defining the learning curve for multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the prostate using MRI-transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) fusion-guided transperineal prostate biopsies as a validation tool.
Gaziev G; Wadhwa K; Barrett T; Koo BC; Gallagher FA; Serrao E; Frey J; Seidenader J; Carmona L; Warren A; Gnanapragasam V; Doble A; Kastner C
BJU Int; 2016 Jan; 117(1):80-6. PubMed ID: 25099182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is There an Impact of Transperineal Versus Transrectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy on the Risk of Upgrading in Final Pathology in Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy? An European Association of Urology-Young Academic Urologists Prostate Cancer Working Group Multi-institutional Study.
Zattoni F; Marra G; Martini A; Kasivisvanathan V; Grummet J; Harkin T; Ploussard G; Olivier J; Chiu PK; Valerio M; Marquis A; Gontero P; Guo H; Zhuang J; Frydenberg M; Moon D; Morlacco A; Kretschmer A; Barletta F; Heidegger I; Tilki D; van den Bergh R; Dal Moro F; Briganti A; Montorsi F; Novara G; Gandaglia G;
Eur Urol Focus; 2023 Jul; 9(4):621-628. PubMed ID: 36746729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transperineal biopsy prostate cancer detection in first biopsy and repeat biopsy after negative transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: the Victorian Transperineal Biopsy Collaboration experience.
Ong WL; Weerakoon M; Huang S; Paul E; Lawrentschuk N; Frydenberg M; Moon D; Murphy D; Grummet J
BJU Int; 2015 Oct; 116(4):568-76. PubMed ID: 25560926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Single Center Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging against Transperineal Prostate Mapping Biopsy: An Analysis of Men with Benign Histology and Insignificant Cancer following Transrectal Ultrasound Biopsy.
Pal RP; Ahmad R; Trecartan S; Voss J; Ahmed S; Bazo A; Lloyd J; Walton TJ
J Urol; 2018 Aug; 200(2):302-308. PubMed ID: 29477717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-guided Transperineal Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-guided Transrectal Prostate Biopsy-A Systematic Review.
Rai BP; Mayerhofer C; Somani BK; Kallidonis P; Nagele U; Tokas T
Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Dec; 4(6):904-913. PubMed ID: 33478936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: What Urologists Need to Know. Part 3: Targeted Biopsy.
Venderink W; Bomers JG; Overduin CG; Padhani AR; de Lauw GR; Sedelaar MJ; Barentsz JO
Eur Urol; 2020 Apr; 77(4):481-490. PubMed ID: 31791623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MRI Targeted Prostate Biopsy Techniques:
Chang SD; Ghai S; Kim CK; Oto A; Giganti F; Moore CM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Dec; 217(6):1263-1281. PubMed ID: 34259038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transperineal Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy Combined with Standard Template Improves Prostate Cancer Detection.
Kim MM; Wu S; Lin SX; Crotty RK; Harisinghani M; Feldman AS; Wu CL; Dahl DM
J Urol; 2022 Jan; 207(1):86-94. PubMed ID: 34428921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Prospective Comparison of Transrectal Standard, Cognitive, Transperineal Fusion, and Mapping Prostate Biopsy for Cancer Detection.
Petov V; Bazarkin A; Morozov A; Taratkin M; Ganzha T; Danilov S; Chernov Y; Chinenov D; Rzayev R; Suvorov A; Amosov A; Fajkovic H; Enikeev D; Krupinov G
J Endourol; 2023 Aug; 37(8):940-947. PubMed ID: 37294206
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Characterizing the learning curve of MRI-US fusion prostate biopsies.
Halstuch D; Baniel J; Lifshitz D; Sela S; Ber Y; Margel D
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2019 Dec; 22(4):546-551. PubMed ID: 30842585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Sonography of the prostate : Relevance for urologists in daily clinical routine].
Apfelbeck M; Clevert DA; Stief CG; Chaloupka M
Urologe A; 2022 Apr; 61(4):365-373. PubMed ID: 35244746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: What Urologists Need to Know. Part 4: Transperineal Magnetic Resonance-Ultrasound Fusion Guided Biopsy Using Local Anesthesia.
Immerzeel J; Israël B; Bomers J; Schoots IG; van Basten JP; Kurth KH; de Reijke T; Sedelaar M; Debruyne F; Barentsz J
Eur Urol; 2022 Jan; 81(1):110-117. PubMed ID: 34799197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Defining the target prior to prostate fusion biopsy: the effect of MRI reporting on cancer detection.
Westhoff N; Siegel F; Peter C; Hetjens S; Porubsky S; Martini T; von Hardenberg J; Michel MS; Budjan J; Ritter M
World J Urol; 2019 Feb; 37(2):327-335. PubMed ID: 29967946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparative study of transperineal software-assisted magnetic resonance/ultrasound fusion biopsy and transrectal cognitive fusion biopsy of the prostate.
Hsieh PF; Chang TY; Lin WC; Chang H; Chang CH; Huang CP; Yang CR; Chen WC; Chang YH; Wang YD; Huang WC; Wu HC
BMC Urol; 2022 Apr; 22(1):72. PubMed ID: 35488246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Controversies in MR targeted biopsy: alone or combined, cognitive versus software-based fusion, transrectal versus transperineal approach?
Marra G; Ploussard G; Futterer J; Valerio M;
World J Urol; 2019 Feb; 37(2):277-287. PubMed ID: 30610359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
