BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38649889)

  • 1. Screening mammography performance according to breast density: a comparison between radiologists versus standalone intelligence detection.
    Kwon MR; Chang Y; Ham SY; Cho Y; Kim EY; Kang J; Park EK; Kim KH; Kim M; Kim TS; Lee H; Kwon R; Lim GY; Choi HR; Choi J; Kook SH; Ryu S
    Breast Cancer Res; 2024 Apr; 26(1):68. PubMed ID: 38649889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Population-wide evaluation of artificial intelligence and radiologist assessment of screening mammograms.
    Kühl J; Elhakim MT; Stougaard SW; Rasmussen BSB; Nielsen M; Gerke O; Larsen LB; Graumann O
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Jun; 34(6):3935-3946. PubMed ID: 37938386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of artificial intelligence in 7533 consecutive prevalent screening mammograms from the BreastScreen Australia program.
    Waugh J; Evans J; Miocevic M; Lockie D; Aminzadeh P; Lynch A; Bell RJ
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Jun; 34(6):3947-3957. PubMed ID: 37955669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Standalone AI for Breast Cancer Detection at Screening Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Yoon JH; Strand F; Baltzer PAT; Conant EF; Gilbert FJ; Lehman CD; Morris EA; Mullen LA; Nishikawa RM; Sharma N; Vejborg I; Moy L; Mann RM
    Radiology; 2023 Jun; 307(5):e222639. PubMed ID: 37219445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of real-life use of artificial intelligence as support for human reading in a population-based breast cancer screening program with mammography and tomosynthesis.
    Elías-Cabot E; Romero-Martín S; Raya-Povedano JL; Brehl AK; Álvarez-Benito M
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Jun; 34(6):3958-3966. PubMed ID: 37975920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of AI for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis on Breast Cancer Detection and Interpretation Time.
    Park EK; Kwak S; Lee W; Choi JS; Kooi T; Kim EK
    Radiol Artif Intell; 2024 May; 6(3):e230318. PubMed ID: 38568095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance of an Artificial Intelligence System for Breast Cancer Detection on Screening Mammograms from BreastScreen Norway.
    Larsen M; Olstad CF; Lee CI; Hovda T; Hoff SR; Martiniussen MA; Mikalsen KØ; Lund-Hanssen H; Solli HS; Silberhorn M; Sulheim ÅØ; Auensen S; Nygård JF; Hofvind S
    Radiol Artif Intell; 2024 May; 6(3):e230375. PubMed ID: 38597784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Early Indicators of the Impact of Using AI in Mammography Screening for Breast Cancer.
    Lauritzen AD; Lillholm M; Lynge E; Nielsen M; Karssemeijer N; Vejborg I
    Radiology; 2024 Jun; 311(3):e232479. PubMed ID: 38832880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The efficacy of artificial intelligence (AI) in detecting interval cancers in the national screening program of a middle-income country.
    Çelik L; Aribal E
    Clin Radiol; 2024 Jul; 79(7):e885-e891. PubMed ID: 38649312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Protocol for evaluating the fitness for purpose of an artificial intelligence product for radiology reporting in the BreastScreen New South Wales breast cancer screening programme.
    Warner-Smith M; Ren K; Mistry C; Walton R; Roder D; Bhola N; McGill S; O'Brien TA
    BMJ Open; 2024 May; 14(5):e082350. PubMed ID: 38806433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of Artificial Intelligence System and Volumetric Density on Risk Prediction of Interval, Screen-Detected, and Advanced Breast Cancer.
    Vachon CM; Scott CG; Norman AD; Khanani SA; Jensen MR; Hruska CB; Brandt KR; Winham SJ; Kerlikowske K
    J Clin Oncol; 2023 Jun; 41(17):3172-3183. PubMed ID: 37104728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patient Characteristics Impact Performance of AI Algorithm in Interpreting Negative Screening Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Studies.
    Nguyen DL; Ren Y; Jones TM; Thomas SM; Lo JY; Grimm LJ
    Radiology; 2024 May; 311(2):e232286. PubMed ID: 38771177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. AI for interpreting screening mammograms: implications for missed cancer in double reading practices and challenging-to-locate lesions.
    Jiang Z; Gandomkar Z; Trieu PDY; Taba ST; Barron ML; Lewis SJ
    Sci Rep; 2024 May; 14(1):11893. PubMed ID: 38789575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Mammography AI Algorithms with a Clinical Risk Model for 5-year Breast Cancer Risk Prediction: An Observational Study.
    Arasu VA; Habel LA; Achacoso NS; Buist DSM; Cord JB; Esserman LJ; Hylton NM; Glymour MM; Kornak J; Kushi LH; Lewis DA; Liu VX; Lydon CM; Miglioretti DL; Navarro DA; Pu A; Shen L; Sieh W; Yoon HC; Lee C
    Radiology; 2023 Jun; 307(5):e222733. PubMed ID: 37278627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic Performance of Artificial Intelligence-Based Computer-Aided Detection Software for Automated Breast Ultrasound.
    Kwon MR; Youn I; Lee MY; Lee HA
    Acad Radiol; 2024 Feb; 31(2):480-491. PubMed ID: 37813703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Semiautonomous Deep Learning System to Reduce False Positives in Screening Mammography.
    Pedemonte S; Tsue T; Mombourquette B; Truong Vu YN; Matthews T; Morales Hoil R; Shah M; Ghare N; Zingman-Daniels N; Holley S; Appleton CM; Su J; Wahl RL
    Radiol Artif Intell; 2024 May; 6(3):e230033. PubMed ID: 38597785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assistive AI in Lung Cancer Screening: A Retrospective Multinational Study in the United States and Japan.
    Kiraly AP; Cunningham CA; Najafi R; Nabulsi Z; Yang J; Lau C; Ledsam JR; Ye W; Ardila D; McKinney SM; Pilgrim R; Liu Y; Saito H; Shimamura Y; Etemadi M; Melnick D; Jansen S; Corrado GS; Peng L; Tse D; Shetty S; Prabhakara S; Nadich DP; Beladia N; Eswaran K
    Radiol Artif Intell; 2024 May; 6(3):e230079. PubMed ID: 38477661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improving mammography interpretation for both novice and experienced readers: a comparative study of two commercial artificial intelligence software.
    Kim HJ; Choi WJ; Gwon HY; Jang SJ; Chae EY; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Kim HH
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Jun; 34(6):3924-3934. PubMed ID: 37938383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Familiarity, confidence and preference of artificial intelligence feedback and prompts by Australian breast cancer screening readers.
    Trieu PDY; Barron ML; Jiang Z; Tavakoli Taba S; Gandomkar Z; Lewis SJ
    Aust Health Rev; 2024 Jun; 48(3):299-311. PubMed ID: 38692648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automated Breast Density Assessment in MRI Using Deep Learning and Radiomics: Strategies for Reducing Inter-Observer Variability.
    Jing X; Wielema M; Monroy-Gonzalez AG; Stams TRG; Mahesh SVK; Oudkerk M; Sijens PE; Dorrius MD; van Ooijen PMA
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2024 Jul; 60(1):80-91. PubMed ID: 37846440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.