50 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38650095)
1. Biomechanical analysis of screw constructs for atlantoaxial fixation in cadavers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Du JY; Aichmair A; Kueper J; Wright T; Lebl DR
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Feb; 22(2):151-61. PubMed ID: 25478824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitatively biomechanical response analysis of posterior musculature reconstruction in cervical single-door laminoplasty.
Liang Z; Xu G; Liu T; Zhong Y; Mo F; Li Z
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2023 May; 233():107479. PubMed ID: 36933316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Finite Element Analysis Comparing the Biomechanical Parameters in Multilevel Posterior Cervical Instrumentation Model Involving Lateral Mass Screw versus Transpedicular Screw Fixation at the C7 Vertebra.
Kulkarni AG; Kumar P; Shetty GM; Roy S; Manickam PS; Dhason R; Chadalavada ARSS; Adbalwad YM
Asian Spine J; 2024 Apr; 18(2):163-173. PubMed ID: 38650095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A biomechanical comparison of three different posterior fixation constructs used for c6-c7 cervical spine immobilization: a finite element study.
Hong JT; Qasim M; Espinoza Orías AA; Natarajan RN; An HS
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo); 2014; 54(9):727-35. PubMed ID: 24418790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical study of anterior transpedicular root screw intervertebral fusion system of lower cervical spine: a finite element analysis.
Ye S; Ye J; Hou Z; You X; Shen S; Zhang J; Yu L; Gu Y; Wang W; Zhao L
Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2024; 12():1352996. PubMed ID: 38357708
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical evaluation of DTRAX(®) posterior cervical cage stabilization with and without lateral mass fixation.
Voronov LI; Siemionow KB; Havey RM; Carandang G; Patwardhan AG
Med Devices (Auckl); 2016; 9():285-90. PubMed ID: 27601934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanics of adjacent segments after a multilevel cervical corpectomy using anterior, posterior, and combined anterior-posterior instrumentation techniques: a finite element model study.
Hussain M; Nassr A; Natarajan RN; An HS; Andersson GB
Spine J; 2013 Jun; 13(6):689-96. PubMed ID: 23578989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Biomechanical Comparison of Intralaminar C7 Screw Constructs with and without Offset Connector Used for C6-7 Cervical Spine Immobilization : A Finite Element Study.
Qasim M; Hong JT; Natarajan RN; An HS
J Korean Neurosurg Soc; 2013 Jun; 53(6):331-6. PubMed ID: 24003366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does Ending a Posterior Construct Proximally at C2 Versus C3 Impact Patient Reported Outcomes in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy Patients up to 24 months After the Surgery?
Algarni N; Dea N; Evaniew N; McIntosh G; Jacobs BW; Paquet J; Wilson JR; Hall H; Bailey CS; Weber MH; Nataraj A; Attabib N; Rampersaud YR; Cadotte DW; Stratton A; Christie SD; Fisher CG; Charest-Morin R
Global Spine J; 2023 Mar; ():21925682231166605. PubMed ID: 36960878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical analysis of the novel S-type dynamic cage by implementation of teaching learning based optimization algorithm - An experimental and finite element study.
Manickam PS; Ghosh G; Shetty GM; Chowdhury AR; Roy S
Med Eng Phys; 2023 Feb; 112():103955. PubMed ID: 36842778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The biomechanical effects of S-type dynamic cage using Ti and PEEK for ACDF surgery on cervical spine varying loads.
Manickam PS; Roy S
Int J Artif Organs; 2021 Oct; 44(10):748-755. PubMed ID: 34387526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical Evaluation of a Novel S-Type, Dynamic Zero-Profile Cage Design for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with Variations in Bone Graft Shape: A Finite Element Analysis.
Manickam PS; Roy S; Shetty GM
World Neurosurg; 2021 Oct; 154():e199-e214. PubMed ID: 34246827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The biomechanical study of cervical spine: A Finite Element Analysis.
Manickam PS; Roy S
Int J Artif Organs; 2022 Jan; 45(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 33645324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Finite-Element analysis of a lateral femoro-tibial impact on the total knee arthroplasty.
Arab AZE; Merdji A; Benaissa A; Roy S; Bachir Bouiadjra BA; Layadi K; Ouddane A; Mukdadi OM
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Aug; 192():105446. PubMed ID: 32200048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanics following skip-level cervical disc arthroplasty versus skip-level cervical discectomy and fusion: a finite element-based study.
Wu TK; Meng Y; Wang BY; Rong X; Hong Y; Ding C; Chen H; Liu H
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Jan; 20(1):49. PubMed ID: 30704444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
