These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38650406)
1. [Comprehensive comparative assessment of the results of treatment of patients with ureteral stones using two different methods]. Giyasov Sh I; Rakhimbaev A A; Ziyayev I B Urologiia; 2024 Mar; (1):49-55. PubMed ID: 38650406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy in the treatment of ureteral calculi: a prospective study. Strohmaier WL; Schubert G; Rosenkranz T; Weigl A Eur Urol; 1999 Nov; 36(5):376-9. PubMed ID: 10516445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy as primary treatment for ureteric stones: a retrospective study comparing two different treatment strategies. Lindqvist K; Holmberg G; Peeker R; Grenabo L Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2006; 40(2):113-8. PubMed ID: 16608808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Emergent versus delayed lithotripsy for obstructing ureteral stones: a cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Arcaniolo D; De Sio M; Rassweiler J; Nicholas J; Lima E; Carrieri G; Liatsikos E; Mirone V; Monga M; Autorino R Urolithiasis; 2017 Dec; 45(6):563-572. PubMed ID: 28233025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Treatment of mid- and lower ureteric calculi: extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy vs laser ureteroscopy. A comparison of costs, morbidity and effectiveness. Bierkens AF; Hendrikx AJ; De La Rosette JJ; Stultiens GN; Beerlage HP; Arends AJ; Debruyne FM Br J Urol; 1998 Jan; 81(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 9467473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Efficiency and cost of treating proximal ureteral stones: shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy plus holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser. Parker BD; Frederick RW; Reilly TP; Lowry PS; Bird ET Urology; 2004 Dec; 64(6):1102-6; discussion 1106. PubMed ID: 15596177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative analysis of direct and indirect costs of two minimally invasive techniques for the treatment of renal/ureteral calculi smaller than 2 cm. Perez-Ardavin J; Lorenzo L; Caballer-Tarazona V; Budía-Alba A; Vivas-Consuelo D; Bahilo-Mateu P; Ordaz-Jurado G; Trassierra-Villa M; López-Acón JD; Boronat-Tormo F Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed); 2020 Sep; 44(7):505-511. PubMed ID: 32593640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Removal of ureteral stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic procedures. What can we learn from the literature in terms of results and treatment efforts? Tiselius HG Urol Res; 2005 Jun; 33(3):185-90. PubMed ID: 15924257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of ESWL and ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy in management of ureteral stones. Cui Y; Cao W; Shen H; Xie J; Adams TS; Zhang Y; Shao Q PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e87634. PubMed ID: 24498344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ureteroscopy and pneumatic lithotripsy, followed by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for the treatment of distal ureteral stones. Gurbuz ZG; Gonen M; Fazlioglu A; Akbulut H Int J Urol; 2002 Aug; 9(8):441-4. PubMed ID: 12225341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Total Surface Area Influences Stone Free Outcomes in Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Distal Ureteral Calculi. Scotland KB; Safaee Ardekani G; Chan JYH; Paterson RF; Chew BH J Endourol; 2019 Aug; 33(8):661-666. PubMed ID: 30860394 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Efficacy of in situ extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for upper ureteral calculi. Rassweiler J; Lutz K; Gumpinger R; Eisenberger F Eur Urol; 1986; 12(6):377-86. PubMed ID: 3545848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treatment of lower pole stones of 10-20 mm. El-Nahas AR; Ibrahim HM; Youssef RF; Sheir KZ BJU Int; 2012 Sep; 110(6):898-902. PubMed ID: 22372915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Treatment of ureteric lithiasis with retrograde ureteroscopy and holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy vs extracorporeal lithotripsy. Arrabal-Polo MA; Arrabal-Martín M; Miján-Ortiz JL; Valle-Díaz F; López-León V; Merino-Salas S; Zuluaga-Gómez A BJU Int; 2009 Oct; 104(8):1144-7. PubMed ID: 19338552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative analysis of ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of childhood proximal ureteral stones. Durmus E; Ok F Pediatr Surg Int; 2022 Dec; 39(1):62. PubMed ID: 36565334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Distal ureteral lithiasis. ESWL versus ambulatory URS]. Miján Ortiz JL; Gutiérrez Tejero F; López Carmona F; Nogueras Ocaña M; Arrabal Martín M; Zuluaga Gómez A Arch Esp Urol; 2001 Nov; 54(9):983-7. PubMed ID: 11789375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Endoscopic management of impacted ureteral stones using a small caliber ureteroscope and a laser lithotriptor. Mugiya S; Nagata M; Un-No T; Takayama T; Suzuki K; Fujita K J Urol; 2000 Aug; 164(2):329-31. PubMed ID: 10893577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intracorporeal or extracorporeal lithotripsy for distal ureteral calculi? Effect of stone size and multiplicity on success rates. Eden CG; Mark IR; Gupta RR; Eastman J; Shrotri NC; Tiptaft RC J Endourol; 1998 Aug; 12(4):307-12. PubMed ID: 9726396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]