These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3865121)

  • 1. Replacing amalgam with posterior composites?
    Smith DC
    Ont Dent; 1985 Jul; 62(7):21-4, 26. PubMed ID: 3865121
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A three-year clinical evaluation of composite resin and a high copper amalgam in posterior primary teeth.
    Nelson GV; Osborne JW; Gale EN; Norman RD; Phillips RW
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1980; 47(6):414-8. PubMed ID: 6934175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The future of dental amalgam].
    Opdam NJ
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2005 Oct; 112(10):373-5. PubMed ID: 16300323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of a packable resin composite, conventional resin composite and amalgam on molar cuspal stiffness.
    Molinaro JD; Diefenderfer KE; Strother JM
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):516-24. PubMed ID: 12216572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Filling material in view: composites and amalgam].
    Kimmel K
    Quintessenz J; 1977 Nov; 7(11):23-5. PubMed ID: 284437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Marketing considerations in the use of amalgams and composites for posterior teeth. The considerable differences in cost, by gram or by volume, of composites for posterior teeth merit the attention of the practicing dentist].
    Perotti R; Brondino D
    Minerva Stomatol; 1990 Dec; 39(12):1017-22. PubMed ID: 2092184
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Posterior composites for modern operative dentistry.
    Douglas WH
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 1996 Sep; 24(9):44-7. PubMed ID: 9120612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Can current composites be used for Class I and II restorations in posterior teeth?].
    Baldensperger R
    Rev Odontostomatol (Paris); 1985; 14(3):175-82. PubMed ID: 3866285
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Esthetic veneering of amalgam restorations with composite resin--combining the best of both worlds?
    Plasmans PJ; Reukers EA
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(2):66-71. PubMed ID: 8337184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Composite or amalgam? Not a black or white decision].
    Roeters FJ; Opdam NJ; Burgersdijk RC
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1992 Oct; 99(10):371-4. PubMed ID: 11820006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical evaluation of composite and amalgam posterior restorations: one year results.
    Derkson GD; Richardson AS; Waldman R
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1982 Jan; 48(1):45-7. PubMed ID: 7034910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical evaluation of composite resin and amalgam posterior restorations: two year results.
    Derkson GD; Richardson AS; Waldman R
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1983 Apr; 49(4):277-9. PubMed ID: 6344966
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. New developments in tooth restoration with amalgam.
    Devlin H
    Dent Update; 1993; 20(1):21-2, 24. PubMed ID: 8330660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical evaluation of composite resin and amalgam posterior restorations: three year results.
    Derkson GD; Richardson AS; Waldman R
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1984 Jun; 50(6):478-80. PubMed ID: 6378338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Composite resins in posterior teeth.
    Leinfelder KF
    Dent Clin North Am; 1981 Apr; 25(2):357-64. PubMed ID: 6941907
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Composites in the mainstream.
    Freedman G
    Dent Today; 2002 Aug; 21(8):90-1. PubMed ID: 12221825
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Amalgam. IX. Substitute for amalgam: durability of composite restorations].
    Schuurs AH; van Amerongen JP
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1993 Oct; 100(10):437-41. PubMed ID: 11822139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Informed consent: direct posterior composite versus amalgam.
    Dlugokinski M; Browning WD
    J Am Coll Dent; 2001; 68(2):31-40. PubMed ID: 11764638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Compressive creep and recovery of light-cured packable composite resins.
    Marghalani HY; Al-Jabab AS
    Dent Mater; 2004 Jul; 20(6):600-10. PubMed ID: 15134949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The composite resin restoration: a literature review, Part III. What the future holds.
    Full CA; Hollander WR
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1993; 60(1):57-9. PubMed ID: 8432949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.