110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38652013)
1. Rectal swab DNA collection protocol for PCR genotyping in rats.
Kaye AE; Proctor-Bonbright JW; Yu JY
Biotechniques; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38652013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Rectal Swab DNA Collection Protocol for PCR Genotyping in Rats.
Kaye AE; Proctor-Bonbright JW; Yu JY
bioRxiv; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38496455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mice genotyping using buccal swab samples: an improved method.
Mitrecić D; Mavrić S; Branica BV; Gajović S
Biochem Genet; 2008 Apr; 46(3-4):105-12. PubMed ID: 18213515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating rectal swab collection method for gut microbiome analysis in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus).
Artim SC; Sheh A; Burns MA; Fox JG
PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0224950. PubMed ID: 31697779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Concordance in diabetic foot ulceration: a cross-sectional study of agreement between wound swabbing and tissue sampling in infected ulcers.
Nelson EA; Wright-Hughes A; Brown S; Lipsky BA; Backhouse M; Bhogal M; Ndosi M; Reynolds C; Sykes G; Dowson C; Edmonds M; Vowden P; Jude EB; Dickie T; Nixon J
Health Technol Assess; 2016 Nov; 20(82):1-176. PubMed ID: 27827300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Saliva as an alternative source of high yield canine genomic DNA for genotyping studies.
Mitsouras K; Faulhaber EA
BMC Res Notes; 2009 Oct; 2():219. PubMed ID: 19874604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Low-Cost Method of Skin Swabbing for the Collection of DNA Samples from Small Laboratory Fish.
Breacker C; Barber I; Norton WH; McDearmid JR; Tilley CA
Zebrafish; 2017 Feb; 14(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 27788059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis to compare quantity and stability of isolated murine DNA.
Garzel LM; Hankenson FC; Combs J; Hankenson KD
Lab Anim (NY); 2010 Sep; 39(9):283-9. PubMed ID: 20729830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Testing skin swabbing for DNA sampling in dendrobatid frogs.
Ringler E
Amphib Reptil; 2018 Jan; 39(2):245-251. PubMed ID: 31327883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Whole genome amplification increases the efficiency and validity of buccal cell genotyping in pediatric populations.
Zheng S; Ma X; Buffler PA; Smith MT; Wiencke JK
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2001 Jun; 10(6):697-700. PubMed ID: 11401921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rectal swab screening assays of public health importance in molecular diagnostics: Sample adequacy control.
Glisovic S; Eintracht S; Longtin Y; Oughton M; Brukner I
J Infect Public Health; 2018; 11(2):234-237. PubMed ID: 28801105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Comparison of Non-Destructive Visceral Swab and Tissue Biopsy Sampling Methods for Genotyping-by-Sequencing in the Freshwater Mussel
Harrison M; Sotola VA; Zalmat A; Sullivan KT; Littrell BM; Bonner TH; Martin NH
Genes (Basel); 2023 May; 14(6):. PubMed ID: 37372377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact assessment of different DNA extraction methods for non-invasive molecular diagnosis of tegumentary leishmaniasis.
de Faria VCS; Gonçalves DU; Soares ARC; Barbosa PH; Saliba JW; de Souza CSA; Cota GF; de Avelar DM
Acta Trop; 2022 Mar; 227():106275. PubMed ID: 34906549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative analysis and physiological impact of different tissue biopsy methodologies used for the genotyping of laboratory mice.
Cinelli P; Rettich A; Seifert B; Bürki K; Arras M
Lab Anim; 2007 Apr; 41(2):174-84. PubMed ID: 17430617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The cotton swab method: an accurate and less invasive way to assess fecal consistency in weaned pigs.
Eriksen EØ; Sejersen MF; Pedersen KS
BMC Vet Res; 2024 Feb; 20(1):47. PubMed ID: 38310282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Collaborative swab performance comparison and the impact of sampling solution volumes on DNA recovery.
Seiberle I; Währer J; Kron S; Flury K; Girardin M; Schocker A; Schulz I
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jul; 59():102716. PubMed ID: 35512614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimizing PCR for Mouse Genotyping: Recommendations for Reliable, Rapid, Cost Effective, Robust and Adaptable to High-Throughput Genotyping Protocol for Any Type of Mutation.
Jacquot S; Chartoire N; Piguet F; Hérault Y; Pavlovic G
Curr Protoc Mouse Biol; 2019 Dec; 9(4):e65. PubMed ID: 31756054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Polymerase chain reaction using conjunctival swab samples for detecting Leishmania DNA in dogs.
Magalhães KA; Pussi KF; Araújo HK; Carmo SBD; Friozi E; Branquinho LS; Lima Junior MSDC; Neitzke-Abreu HC
Rev Bras Parasitol Vet; 2021; 30(3):e009121. PubMed ID: 34259743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genotyping-in-Thousands by sequencing (GT-seq) panel development and application to minimally invasive DNA samples to support studies in molecular ecology.
Schmidt DA; Campbell NR; Govindarajulu P; Larsen KW; Russello MA
Mol Ecol Resour; 2020 Jan; 20(1):114-124. PubMed ID: 31483931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Technical note: A comparison of DNA collection methods in cattle and yaks.
Neary MT; Neary JM; Lund GK; Garry FB; Holt TN; Mohun TJ; Breckenridge RA
J Anim Sci; 2014 Sep; 92(9):3811-5. PubMed ID: 25085402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
