These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38653386)

  • 21. Evaluation of practice efficiency with a novel sheathed flexible cystoscope: a randomized controlled trial.
    Krebs A; Borin JF; Kim IY; Jackson DJ; McDougall EM; Clayman RV
    Urology; 2007 Nov; 70(5):883-7. PubMed ID: 17919698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Single-Use Grasper Integrated Flexible Cystoscope for Stent Removal: A Micro-Costing Analysis-Based Comparison.
    Beebe SC; Jenkins LC; Posid T; Knudsen BE; Sourial MW
    J Endourol; 2020 Aug; 34(8):816-820. PubMed ID: 32600072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Influence of systematic antibiotic prophylaxis and/or cystoscope cleaning/disinfecting method on urinary culture becoming positive after outpatient flexible cystoscopy.].
    Martínez Rodríguez R; Felip E; Arzoz Fabregas M; Ruiz Domínguez J; Ibarz Servio L
    Arch Esp Urol; 2019 Jul; 72(6):554-559. PubMed ID: 31274119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Flexible cystoscopy for ureteral stent removal without antimicrobial prophylaxis. A prospective observational study.
    Olivero A; Riccardi N; Ndrevataj D; Balzarini F; Cerasuolo M; Bottino P; Borghesi M; Dodi F; Terrone C
    Urologia; 2021 May; 88(2):130-134. PubMed ID: 33325327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Institutional Micro-Cost Comparative Analysis of Reusable vs Single-use Cystoscopes With Assessment of Environmental Footprint.
    Bertolo R; Gilioli V; Veccia A; Malandra S; Dal Corso L; Fenzi D; Mazzetto F; Antonelli A
    Urology; 2024 Jun; 188():70-76. PubMed ID: 38499187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of Clinical Use and Cost-Effectiveness of a Flexible Cystoscope System with a Disposable Sheath: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Zambon JP; Watkins TP; Hemal A; Evans RJ; Gutierrez-Aceves J; Mirzazadeh M; Terlecki RP; Deveshwar SP; Hemal K; Badlani GH
    Urol Pract; 2019 Jul; 6(4):209-214. PubMed ID: 37317475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Prospective comparison of flexible fiberoptic and digital cystoscopes.
    Okhunov Z; Hruby GW; Mirabile G; Marruffo F; Lehman DS; Benson MC; Gupta M; Landman J
    Urology; 2009 Aug; 74(2):427-30. PubMed ID: 19501889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Prospective Randomized Trial of Single-Use
    Johnson BA; Raman JD; Best SL; Lotan Y
    J Endourol; 2023 Oct; 37(10):1139-1144. PubMed ID: 37565290
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Single-use digital flexible cystoscope for double J removal versus reusable instruments: a prospective, comparative study of functionality, risk of infection, and costs.
    Oderda M; Asimakopoulos A; Batetta V; Bosio A; Dalmasso E; Morra I; Vercelli E; Gontero P
    World J Urol; 2023 Nov; 41(11):3175-3180. PubMed ID: 37783843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The impact of single-use digital flexible cystoscope for double J removal on hospital costs and work organization: A multicentric evaluation.
    Oderda M; Amato A; de la Rosette J; Doizi S; Estrade V; Falcone M; Grey B; Knudsen B; Olsburgh J; Pietropaolo A; Rukin N; Sedigh O; Saeed A; Somani BK; Gontero P
    Urologia; 2023 Nov; 90(4):670-677. PubMed ID: 37154464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Economic and organizational impact of the use of a disposable sheath with a flexible cystoscope].
    Coste AC; Ruffion A; Lechevallier E; Devonec M; Paparel P; Champetier D; Vinet M; Adam E; Briant PE; De Vendin C; Coulange C; Delaporte V; Gaillet S; Faïs PO; Monges A; Arnoux V; Armoiry X; Gardes S; Bin S; Karsenty G
    Prog Urol; 2013 Apr; 23(5):356-63. PubMed ID: 23545011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A microbiological evaluation of level of disinfection for flexible cystoscopes protected by disposable endosheaths.
    Jørgensen PH; Slotsbjerg T; Westh H; Buitenhuis V; Hermann GG
    BMC Urol; 2013 Oct; 13():46. PubMed ID: 24099332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sterile disposable sheath system for flexible cystoscopes.
    Lawrentschuk N; Chamberlain M
    Urology; 2005 Dec; 66(6):1310-3. PubMed ID: 16360465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Post-cystoscopy infections and device malfunctions in reprocessed flexible cystoscopes in a national database.
    Lee J; Kaplan-Marans E; Jivanji D; Tennenbaum D; Schulman A
    Can J Urol; 2022 Dec; 29(6):11361-11365. PubMed ID: 36495577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Single-Use Versus Reusable Cystoscope for Ureteral Stent Removal: A Comparative Study of Perceived Pain and Procedure Times.
    Panach-Navarrete J; Lloret-Durà MA; Sánchez-Gimeno S; Murcia-Díez E; Martínez-Jabaloyas JM
    Arch Esp Urol; 2023 Feb; 76(1):65-69. PubMed ID: 36914421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Reusable vs. single-use cystoscope for removal of double-j stent: a prospective randomized comparison and cost analysis.
    Alkhamees M; Alothman A; Alzughaibi M; AlAsker A; Ghazwani Y; Masuadi E; Alshohayeb I; Hamri SB
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2022 Jun; 26(12):4268-4273. PubMed ID: 35776026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of hexaminolevulinate based flexible and rigid fluorescence cystoscopy with rigid white light cystoscopy in bladder cancer: results of a prospective Phase II study.
    Witjes JA; Moonen PM; van der Heijden AG
    Eur Urol; 2005 Mar; 47(3):319-22. PubMed ID: 15716194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Prospective Analysis of Versatility and User Satisfaction with a Novel Single-Use Cystoscope with Working Channel.
    Lütfrenk T; Neisius A; Rausch S; Salem J; Kuru TH
    Urol Int; 2023; 107(6):570-577. PubMed ID: 37071983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Implementation of a Tele-urology Program for Outpatient Hematuria Referrals: Initial Results and Patient Satisfaction.
    Safir IJ; Gabale S; David SA; Huang JH; Gerhard RS; Pearl J; Lorentz CA; Baumgardner J; Filson CP; Issa MM
    Urology; 2016 Nov; 97():33-39. PubMed ID: 27450940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A randomised single-blind comparison of the effectiveness of Tristel Fuse (chlorine dioxide) as an office-based fluid soak, with Cidex OPA (ortho-phthaldehyde) using an automated endoscopic reprocessor (AER) as high-level disinfection for flexible cystoscopes.
    Gilling PJ; Reuther RM; Addidle M; Lockhart MM; Frampton CM; Fraundorfer MR
    BJU Int; 2013 Nov; 112 Suppl 2():69-73. PubMed ID: 24127679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.