176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38654958)
1. Factors Influencing the Decision-Making Process for Undergoing Invasive Prenatal Testing.
Tzela P; Antsaklis P; Kanellopoulos D; Antonakopoulos N; Gourounti K
Cureus; 2024 Apr; 16(4):e58803. PubMed ID: 38654958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.
Truglio-Londrigan M; Slyer JT; Singleton JK; Worral P
JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2012; 10(58):4633-4646. PubMed ID: 27820528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Latinx individuals' knowledge of, preferences for, and experiences with prenatal genetic testing: a scoping review.
Grafft N; Dwyer AA; Pineros-Leano M
Reprod Health; 2022 Jun; 19(1):134. PubMed ID: 35668466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy in singleton pregnancies.
Chitayat D; Langlois S; Douglas Wilson R; ;
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2011 Jul; 33(7):736-750. PubMed ID: 21749752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Determinants associated with making prenatal screening decisions in a national study.
Bakst S; Romano-Zelekha O; Ostrovsky J; Shohat T
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 Jan; 39(1):41-48. PubMed ID: 30244627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Women's experiences with non-invasive prenatal testing in Switzerland: a qualitative analysis.
Fang MT; Germani F; Spitale G; Wäscher S; Kunz L; Biller-Andorno N
BMC Med Ethics; 2023 Oct; 24(1):85. PubMed ID: 37872496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prenatal diagnosis: choices women make about pursuing testing and acting on abnormal results.
Pryde PG; Drugan A; Johnson MP; Isada NB; Evans MI
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Sep; 36(3):496-509. PubMed ID: 8403601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prenatal Diagnosis Procedures and Techniques to Obtain a Diagnostic Fetal Specimen or Tissue: Maternal and Fetal Risks and Benefits.
Wilson RD; Gagnon A; Audibert F; Campagnolo C; Carroll J;
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2015 Jul; 37(7):656-668. PubMed ID: 26366824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A review on the motivations, decision-making factors, attitudes and experiences of couples using pre-implantation genetic testing for inherited conditions.
Hughes T; Bracewell-Milnes T; Saso S; Jones BP; Almeida PA; Maclaren K; Norman-Taylor J; Johnson M; Nikolaou D
Hum Reprod Update; 2021 Aug; 27(5):944-966. PubMed ID: 33969393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prenatal screening for and diagnosis of aneuploidy in twin pregnancies.
Audibert F; Gagnon A; ;
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2011 Jul; 33(7):754-67. PubMed ID: 21749753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of a decision aid on informed decision-making in the era of non-invasive prenatal testing: a randomised controlled trial.
Beulen L; van den Berg M; Faas BH; Feenstra I; Hageman M; van Vugt JM; Bekker MN
Eur J Hum Genet; 2016 Oct; 24(10):1409-16. PubMed ID: 27189020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.
Perrenoud B; Velonaki VS; Bodenmann P; Ramelet AS
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Oct; 13(10):82-94. PubMed ID: 26571285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What factors hinder the decision-making process for women with cancer and contemplating fertility preservation treatment?
Jones G; Hughes J; Mahmoodi N; Smith E; Skull J; Ledger W
Hum Reprod Update; 2017 Jul; 23(4):433-457. PubMed ID: 28510760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
Busolo D; Woodgate R
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):99-111. PubMed ID: 26447011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Preferences of pregnant women for amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling for prenatal testing: comparison of patients' choices and those of a decision-analytic model.
Heckerling PS; Verp MS; Hadro TA
J Clin Epidemiol; 1994 Nov; 47(11):1215-28. PubMed ID: 7722557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computerized prenatal genetic testing decision-assisting tool: a randomized controlled trial.
Kuppermann M; Norton ME; Gates E; Gregorich SE; Learman LA; Nakagawa S; Feldstein VA; Lewis J; Washington AE; Nease RF
Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jan; 113(1):53-63. PubMed ID: 19104360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Joint SOGC-CCMG Opinion for Reproductive Genetic Carrier Screening: An Update for All Canadian Providers of Maternity and Reproductive Healthcare in the Era of Direct-to-Consumer Testing.
Wilson RD; De Bie I; Armour CM; Brown RN; Campagnolo C; Carroll JC; Okun N; Nelson T; Zwingerman R; Audibert F; Brock JA; Brown RN; Campagnolo C; Carroll JC; De Bie I; Johnson JA; Okun N; Pastruck M; Vallée-Pouliot K; Wilson RD; Zwingerman R; Armour C; Chitayat D; De Bie I; Fernandez S; Kim R; Lavoie J; Leonard N; Nelson T; Taylor S; Van Allen M; Van Karnebeek C
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2016 Aug; 38(8):742-762.e3. PubMed ID: 27638987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of prenatally diagnosed structural congenital anomalies.
Gagnon A;
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2009 Sep; 31(9):875-881. PubMed ID: 19941713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Why do patients decline amniocentesis? Analysis of factors influencing the decision to refuse invasive prenatal testing.
Sadlecki P; Grabiec M; Walentowicz P; Walentowicz-Sadlecka M
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 May; 18(1):174. PubMed ID: 29769050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. "I think we've got too many tests!": Prenatal providers' reflections on ethical and clinical challenges in the practice integration of cell-free DNA screening.
Gammon BL; Kraft SA; Michie M; Allyse M
Ethics Med Public Health; 2016; 2(3):334-342. PubMed ID: 28180146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
