These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38655672)

  • 1. Comparative clinical evaluation between self-adhesive and conventional bulk-fill composites in class II cavities: A 1-year randomized controlled clinical study.
    Ellithy MS; Abdelrahman MH; Afifi RR
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 Sep; 36(9):1311-1325. PubMed ID: 38655672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Randomized clinical split-mouth study on a novel self-adhesive bulk-fill restorative vs. a conventional bulk-fill composite for restoration of class II cavities - results after three years.
    Cieplik F; Hiller KA; Buchalla W; Federlin M; Scholz KJ
    J Dent; 2022 Oct; 125():104275. PubMed ID: 36044948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. One-year results of a novel self-adhesive bulk-fill restorative and a conventional bulk-fill composite in class II cavities-a randomized clinical split-mouth study.
    Cieplik F; Scholz KJ; Anthony JC; Tabenski I; Ettenberger S; Hiller KA; Buchalla W; Federlin M
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Jan; 26(1):449-461. PubMed ID: 34129074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Postoperative sensitivity in posterior restorations restored with self-adhesive and conventional bulk-fill resin composites: A randomized clinical split-mouth trial.
    Maghaireh GA; Albashaireh ZS; Allouz HA
    J Dent; 2023 Oct; 137():104655. PubMed ID: 37562757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Flowable bulk-fill versus layering restorative material on Class II restorations: A randomized clinical trial.
    Torres CRG; Mailart MC; Moecke SE; Matuda AGN; Veloso SM; da Silva Ávila DM; Nicoló RD; Borges AB
    J Dent; 2024 Sep; 148():105154. PubMed ID: 38942111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical performance of two ion-releasing bulk-fill composites in class I and class II restorations: A two-year evaluation.
    Albelasy EH; Hamama HH; Chew HP; Montasser M; Mahmoud SH
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 May; 36(5):723-736. PubMed ID: 38174898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of different placement techniques on the clinical success of bulk-fill resin composites placed in Class II cavities: a 4-year randomized controlled clinical study.
    Çakır Kılınç NN; Demirbuğa S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Feb; 27(2):541-557. PubMed ID: 36222961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A randomized, prospective clinical study evaluating effectiveness of a bulk-fill composite resin, a conventional composite resin and a reinforced glass ionomer in Class II cavities: one-year results.
    Balkaya H; Arslan S; Pala K
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2019; 27():e20180678. PubMed ID: 31596369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative evaluation of different adhesive strategies of a universal adhesive in class II bulk-fill restorations: A 48-month randomized controlled trial.
    Yazici AR; Uslu Tekce A; Kutuk ZB
    J Dent; 2022 Feb; 117():103921. PubMed ID: 34896442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical evaluation of a new chemically-cured bulk-fill composite in posterior restorations: 6-month multicenter double-blind randomized clinical trial.
    Loguercio AD; Carpio-Salvatierra B; Ñaupari-Villasante R; Wendlinger M; Armas-Vega A; Cavagnaro S; León A; Aliaga-Galvez R; Gutiérrez MF
    J Dent; 2024 Oct; 149():105246. PubMed ID: 39025426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Marginal Integrity of Bulk Versus Incremental Fill Class II Composite Restorations.
    Al-Harbi F; Kaisarly D; Bader D; El Gezawi M
    Oper Dent; 2016; 41(2):146-56. PubMed ID: 26266653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical performance of posterior restorations using a universal adhesive over moist and dry dentin: A 36-month double-blind split-mouth randomized clinical trial.
    Ñaupari-Villasante R; Falconi-Páez C; Castro AS; Gutiérrez MF; Mendez-Bauer ML; Aliaga P; Dávila-Sánchez A; Arrais C; Reis A; Loguercio AD
    J Dent; 2024 Aug; 147():105080. PubMed ID: 38788919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Marginal Gap Formation in Approximal "Bulk Fill" Resin Composite Restorations After Artificial Ageing.
    Peutzfeldt A; Mühlebach S; Lussi A; Flury S
    Oper Dent; 2018; 43(2):180-189. PubMed ID: 29148914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can composite packaging and selective enamel etching affect the clinical behavior of bulk-fill composite resin in posterior restorations? 24-month results of a randomized clinical trial.
    Barceleiro MO; Tardem C; Albuquerque EG; Lopes LS; Marins SS; Poubel LA; Barcelos R; Ñaupari-Villasante R; Loguercio AD; Calazans FS
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2023; 31():e20220323. PubMed ID: 36790298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of bulk fill resin composite and universal adhesive for restoring primary teeth after selective carious tissue removal to soft dentin: A randomized clinical trial.
    Massa MG; Trentin GA; Noal FC; Franzon R; Lenzi TL; de Araujo FB
    Am J Dent; 2022 Apr; 35(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 35506965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A randomized clinical split-mouth trial of a bulk-fill and a nanohybrid composite restorative in class II cavities: Three-year results.
    Sekundo C; Fazeli S; Felten A; Schoilew K; Wolff D; Frese C
    Dent Mater; 2022 May; 38(5):759-768. PubMed ID: 35437156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Three-year clinical evaluation of a silorane composite resin.
    Walter R; Boushell LW; Heymann HO; Ritter AV; Sturdevant JR; Wilder AD; Chung Y; Swift EJ
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2014; 26(3):179-90. PubMed ID: 24344912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical evaluation of bulk-fill and universal nanocomposites in class II cavities: Five-year results of a randomized clinical split-mouth trial.
    Schoilew K; Fazeli S; Felten A; Sekundo C; Wolff D; Frese C
    J Dent; 2023 Jan; 128():104362. PubMed ID: 36410582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Two-year Clinical Comparison of Three Different Restorative Materials in Class II Cavities.
    Balkaya H; Arslan S
    Oper Dent; 2020; 45(1):E32-E42. PubMed ID: 31738696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of Dentin Moisture in Posterior Restorations Performed with Universal Adhesive: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Castro AS; Maran BM; Gutierrez MF; Chemin K; Mendez-Bauer ML; Bermúdez JP; Reis A; Loguercio AD
    Oper Dent; 2022 Mar; 47(2):E91-E105. PubMed ID: 35405005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.