These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38656010)

  • 1. Performance of ChatGPT-4 in answering questions from the Brazilian National Examination for Medical Degree Revalidation.
    Wiwanitkit S; Wiwanitkit V
    Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2024; 70(3):e20231362. PubMed ID: 38656010
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of ChatGPT-4 in answering questions from the Brazilian National Examination for Medical Degree Revalidation.
    Gobira M; Nakayama LF; Moreira R; Andrade E; Regatieri CVS; Belfort R
    Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2023; 69(10):e20230848. PubMed ID: 37792871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of ChatGPT on Specialty Certificate Examination in Dermatology multiple-choice questions.
    Passby L; Jenko N; Wernham A
    Clin Exp Dermatol; 2024 Jun; 49(7):722-727. PubMed ID: 37264670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. National Licensure Exam for Brazilian Nurses: why and for whom?
    Silva KLD; Cabral IE
    Rev Bras Enferm; 2018; 71(suppl 4):1692-1699. PubMed ID: 30088642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Issues for consideration about use of ChatGPT. Comment on 'Performance of ChatGPT on Specialty Certificate Examination in Dermatology multiple-choice questions'.
    Kleebayoon A; Wiwanitkit V
    Clin Exp Dermatol; 2024 Jun; 49(7):729. PubMed ID: 37311180
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. ABO invites question for phase II examination.
    English JD; Briss BS; Diemer R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Sep; 126(3):388. PubMed ID: 15356506
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [ChatGPT and the German board examination for ophthalmology: an evaluation].
    Yaïci R; Cieplucha M; Bock R; Moayed F; Bechrakis NE; Berens P; Feltgen N; Friedburg D; Gräf M; Guthoff R; Hoffmann EM; Hoerauf H; Hintschich C; Kohnen T; Messmer EM; Nentwich MM; Pleyer U; Schaudig U; Seitz B; Geerling G; Roth M
    Ophthalmologie; 2024 Jul; 121(7):554-564. PubMed ID: 38801461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance of ChatGPT on Factual Knowledge Questions Regarding Clinical Pharmacy.
    van Nuland M; Erdogan A; Aςar C; Contrucci R; Hilbrants S; Maanach L; Egberts T; van der Linden PD
    J Clin Pharmacol; 2024 Sep; 64(9):1095-1100. PubMed ID: 38623909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance of ChatGPT Across Different Versions in Medical Licensing Examinations Worldwide: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Liu M; Okuhara T; Chang X; Shirabe R; Nishiie Y; Okada H; Kiuchi T
    J Med Internet Res; 2024 Jul; 26():e60807. PubMed ID: 39052324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of deliberate, excessive violations of test security on performance on a standardized-patient examination.
    Swartz MH; Colliver JA; Cohen DS; Barrows HS
    Acad Med; 1993 Oct; 68(10 Suppl):S76-8. PubMed ID: 8216641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Performance of ChatGPT-4V in Interpreting Images and Tables in the Japanese Medical Licensing Exam.
    Takagi S; Koda M; Watari T
    JMIR Med Educ; 2024 May; 10():e54283. PubMed ID: 38787024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Consistency of pass-fail decisions made with clinical clerkship ratings and standardized-patient examination scores.
    Vu NV; Henkle JQ; Colliver JA
    Acad Med; 1994 Oct; 69(10 Suppl):S40-1. PubMed ID: 7916823
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exploring the Performance of ChatGPT Versions 3.5, 4, and 4 With Vision in the Chilean Medical Licensing Examination: Observational Study.
    Rojas M; Rojas M; Burgess V; Toro-Pérez J; Salehi S
    JMIR Med Educ; 2024 Apr; 10():e55048. PubMed ID: 38686550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Objective Structured Clinical Examination--an established method of testing physicians' clinical competence].
    Holm AL; Aspegren K
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2004 May; 166(21):2002-4. PubMed ID: 15222073
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of repeated use of objective structured clinical examination stations.
    Cohen R; Rothman AI; Ross J; Poldre P
    Acad Med; 1993 Oct; 68(10 Suppl):S73-5. PubMed ID: 8216640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to set passing standards for a standardized-patient examination of clinical competence.
    Colliver JA; Barnhart AJ; Marcy ML; Verhulst SJ
    Acad Med; 1994 Oct; 69(10 Suppl):S37-9. PubMed ID: 7916821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Developing the teaching instinct. 10: Assessment.
    McAleer S; Hesketh EA;
    Med Teach; 2003 Nov; 25(6):585-8. PubMed ID: 15369905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. ChatGPT-3.5 and ChatGPT-4 dermatological knowledge level based on the Specialty Certificate Examination in Dermatology.
    Lewandowski M; Łukowicz P; Świetlik D; Barańska-Rybak W
    Clin Exp Dermatol; 2024 Jun; 49(7):686-691. PubMed ID: 37540015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [360-degree feedback for medical trainees].
    Holm E; Holm K; Sørensen JL
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2014 Dec; 176(49):. PubMed ID: 25497857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using tagged items to detect threats to security in a nationally administered standardized patient examination.
    MacMillan MK; De Champlain AF; Klass DJ
    Acad Med; 1999 Oct; 74(10 Suppl):S55-7. PubMed ID: 10536593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.