These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38656770)
1. Focusing on Positive Listening Experiences Improves Speech Intelligibility in Experienced Hearing Aid Users. Lelic D; Nielsen LLA; Pedersen AK; Neher T Trends Hear; 2024; 28():23312165241246616. PubMed ID: 38656770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Focusing on positive listening experiences improves hearing aid outcomes in experienced hearing aid users. Lelic D; Parker D; Herrlin P; Wolters F; Smeds K Int J Audiol; 2024 Jun; 63(6):420-430. PubMed ID: 37005863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of single-microphone noise reduction schemes: can hearing impaired listeners tell the difference? Huber R; Bisitz T; Gerkmann T; Kiessling J; Meister H; Kollmeier B Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S55-S61. PubMed ID: 28112001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Acoustic and perceptual effects of magnifying interaural difference cues in a simulated "binaural" hearing aid. de Taillez T; Grimm G; Kollmeier B; Neher T Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S81-S91. PubMed ID: 28395561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of SNR, masker type and noise reduction processing on sentence recognition performance and listening effort as indicated by the pupil dilation response. Ohlenforst B; Wendt D; Kramer SE; Naylor G; Zekveld AA; Lunner T Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():90-99. PubMed ID: 29779607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dynamic relation between working memory capacity and speech recognition in noise during the first 6 months of hearing aid use. Ng EH; Classon E; Larsby B; Arlinger S; Lunner T; Rudner M; Rönnberg J Trends Hear; 2014 Nov; 18():. PubMed ID: 25421088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of hearing aid algorithms using a master hearing aid: the influence of hearing aid experience on the relationship between speech recognition and cognitive capacity. Rählmann S; Meis M; Schulte M; Kießling J; Walger M; Meister H Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S105-S111. PubMed ID: 28449597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of noise reduction on speech intelligibility, perceived listening effort, and personal preference in hearing-impaired listeners. Brons I; Houben R; Dreschler WA Trends Hear; 2014 Oct; 18():. PubMed ID: 25315377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of directional sound processing and listener's motivation on EEG responses to continuous noisy speech: Do normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners differ? Mirkovic B; Debener S; Schmidt J; Jaeger M; Neher T Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():260-270. PubMed ID: 31003037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Acceptable noise level (ANL) and real-world hearing-aid success in Taiwanese listeners. Ho HC; Wu YH; Hsiao SH; Zhang X Int J Audiol; 2013 Nov; 52(11):762-70. PubMed ID: 24099584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hearing aid fitting and fine-tuning based on estimated individual traits. Völker C; Ernst SMA; Kollmeier B Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S139-S145. PubMed ID: 27873543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluating the benefit of hearing aids in solving the cocktail party problem. Marrone N; Mason CR; Kidd G Trends Amplif; 2008 Dec; 12(4):300-15. PubMed ID: 19010794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The performance of an automatic acoustic-based program classifier compared to hearing aid users' manual selection of listening programs. Searchfield GD; Linford T; Kobayashi K; Crowhen D; Latzel M Int J Audiol; 2018 Mar; 57(3):201-212. PubMed ID: 29069954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Auditory inspired machine learning techniques can improve speech intelligibility and quality for hearing-impaired listeners. Monaghan JJ; Goehring T; Yang X; Bolner F; Wang S; Wright MC; Bleeck S J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):1985. PubMed ID: 28372043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Syllable-constituent perception by hearing-aid users: Common factors in quiet and noise. Miller JD; Watson CS; Leek MR; Dubno JR; Wark DJ; Souza PE; Gordon-Salant S; Ahlstrom JB J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2933. PubMed ID: 28464618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improving speech-in-noise recognition for children with hearing loss: potential effects of language abilities, binaural summation, and head shadow. Nittrouer S; Caldwell-Tarr A; Tarr E; Lowenstein JH; Rice C; Moberly AC Int J Audiol; 2013 Aug; 52(8):513-25. PubMed ID: 23834373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An Australian version of the acceptable noise level test and its predictive value for successful hearing aid use in an older population. Walravens E; Keidser G; Hartley D; Hickson L Int J Audiol; 2014 Feb; 53 Suppl 1():S52-9. PubMed ID: 24447234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]