These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38656770)

  • 21. An algorithm to improve speech recognition in noise for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Healy EW; Yoho SE; Wang Y; Wang D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):3029-38. PubMed ID: 24116438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Danish reading span data from 283 hearing-aid users, including a sub-group analysis of their relationship to speech-in-noise performance.
    Borch Petersen E; Lunner T; Vestergaard MD; Sundewall Thorén E
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(4):254-61. PubMed ID: 26836955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Hearing impairment, cognition and speech understanding: exploratory factor analyses of a comprehensive test battery for a group of hearing aid users, the n200 study.
    Rönnberg J; Lunner T; Ng EH; Lidestam B; Zekveld AA; Sörqvist P; Lyxell B; Träff U; Yumba W; Classon E; Hällgren M; Larsby B; Signoret C; Pichora-Fuller MK; Rudner M; Danielsson H; Stenfelt S
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Nov; 55(11):623-42. PubMed ID: 27589015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Placebo effects in hearing-aid trials are reliable.
    Dawes P; Hopkins R; Munro KJ
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jul; 52(7):472-7. PubMed ID: 23594421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The ANL: does it, or does it not?
    Roeser RJ
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Jan; 53(1):1. PubMed ID: 24219090
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Auditory acclimatization and hearing aids: late auditory evoked potentials and speech recognition following unilateral and bilateral amplification.
    Dawes P; Munro KJ; Kalluri S; Edwards B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jun; 135(6):3560-9. PubMed ID: 24907819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluating hearing aid amplification using idiosyncratic consonant errors.
    Abavisani A; Allen JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Dec; 142(6):3736. PubMed ID: 29289077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of noise and working memory capacity on memory processing of speech for hearing-aid users.
    Ng EH; Rudner M; Lunner T; Pedersen MS; Rönnberg J
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jul; 52(7):433-41. PubMed ID: 23550584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. How directional microphones affect speech recognition, listening effort and localisation for listeners with moderate-to-severe hearing loss.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Dec; 56(12):909-918. PubMed ID: 28738747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Avoiding disconnection: An evaluation of telephone options for cochlear implant users.
    Marcrum SC; Picou EM; Steffens T
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Mar; 56(3):186-193. PubMed ID: 27809627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of combined dynamic compression and single channel noise reduction for hearing aid applications.
    Kortlang S; Chen Z; Gerkmann T; Kollmeier B; Hohmann V; Ewert SD
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S43-S54. PubMed ID: 28355947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Wireless binaural hearing aid technology for telephone use and listening in wind noise.
    Au A; Blakeley JM; Dowell RC; Rance G
    Int J Audiol; 2019 Apr; 58(4):193-199. PubMed ID: 30474445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Speech quality evaluation of a sparse coding shrinkage noise reduction algorithm with normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners.
    Sang J; Hu H; Zheng C; Li G; Lutman ME; Bleeck S
    Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():175-85. PubMed ID: 26232529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. NAL-NL2 empirical adjustments.
    Keidser G; Dillon H; Carter L; O'Brien A
    Trends Amplif; 2012 Dec; 16(4):211-23. PubMed ID: 23203416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of interferer facing orientation on speech perception by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Strelcyk O; Pentony S; Kalluri S; Edwards B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1419-32. PubMed ID: 24606279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Factors influencing speech perception in noise for 5-year-old children using hearing aids or cochlear implants.
    Ching TY; Zhang VW; Flynn C; Burns L; Button L; Hou S; McGhie K; Van Buynder P
    Int J Audiol; 2018 May; 57(sup2):S70-S80. PubMed ID: 28687057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of the NAL Dynamic Conversations Test in older listeners with hearing loss.
    Best V; Keidser G; Freeston K; Buchholz JM
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Mar; 57(3):221-229. PubMed ID: 28826285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Tailoring auditory training to patient needs with single and multiple talkers: transfer-appropriate gains on a four-choice discrimination test.
    Barcroft J; Sommers MS; Tye-Murray N; Mauzé E; Schroy C; Spehar B
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Nov; 50(11):802-8. PubMed ID: 21929377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Masked speech perception across the adult lifespan: Impact of age and hearing impairment.
    Goossens T; Vercammen C; Wouters J; van Wieringen A
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():109-124. PubMed ID: 27845259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.