146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38657305)
21. A combination of microbial electrolysis cells and bioaugmentation can effectively treat synthetic wastewater containing polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon.
Min Z; Rui T; Yu L
Water Sci Technol; 2024 May; 89(10):2716-2731. PubMed ID: 38822610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The yield and decay coefficients of exoelectrogenic bacteria in bioelectrochemical systems.
Wilson EL; Kim Y
Water Res; 2016 May; 94():233-239. PubMed ID: 26963605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A Nickel- and Cerium-Doped Zeolite Composite: An Affordable Cathode Material for Biohydrogen Production in Microbial Electrolysis Cells.
Wang J; Li Y; Liu M; Li Z; Gao X; Yang D
Chempluschem; 2020 Oct; 85(10):2290-2297. PubMed ID: 32965086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Performance of a semi-pilot tubular microbial electrolysis cell (MEC) under several hydraulic retention times and applied voltages.
Gil-Carrera L; Escapa A; Carracedo B; Morán A; Gómez X
Bioresour Technol; 2013 Oct; 146():63-69. PubMed ID: 23911817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Multi-population model of a microbial electrolysis cell.
Pinto RP; Srinivasan B; Escapa A; Tartakovsky B
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Jun; 45(11):5039-46. PubMed ID: 21534584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Heavy metal recovery combined with H₂ production from artificial acid mine drainage using the microbial electrolysis cell.
Luo H; Liu G; Zhang R; Bai Y; Fu S; Hou Y
J Hazard Mater; 2014 Apr; 270():153-9. PubMed ID: 24576695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Reduced energy consumption during low strength domestic wastewater treatment in a semi-pilot tubular microbial electrolysis cell.
Gil-Carrera L; Escapa A; Moreno R; Morán A
J Environ Manage; 2013 Jun; 122():1-7. PubMed ID: 23524371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Hydrogen production in single chamber microbial electrolysis cells with different complex substrates.
Montpart N; Rago L; Baeza JA; Guisasola A
Water Res; 2015 Jan; 68():601-15. PubMed ID: 25462766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Microbial electrolysis cells for waste biorefinery: A state of the art review.
Lu L; Ren ZJ
Bioresour Technol; 2016 Sep; 215():254-264. PubMed ID: 27020129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Removal of organic carbon and nitrogen in a membraneless flow-through microbial electrolysis cell.
Hussain A; Lebrun FM; Tartakovsky B
Enzyme Microb Technol; 2017 Jul; 102():41-48. PubMed ID: 28465059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Anode microbial communities produced by changing from microbial fuel cell to microbial electrolysis cell operation using two different wastewaters.
Kiely PD; Cusick R; Call DF; Selembo PA; Regan JM; Logan BE
Bioresour Technol; 2011 Jan; 102(1):388-94. PubMed ID: 20554197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Mo
Lu S; Lu B; Tan G; Moe W; Xu W; Wang Y; Xing D; Zhu X
Biosens Bioelectron; 2020 Nov; 167():112491. PubMed ID: 32798808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Cadmium (II) removal mechanisms in microbial electrolysis cells.
Colantonio N; Kim Y
J Hazard Mater; 2016 Jul; 311():134-41. PubMed ID: 26970043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Efficiently "pumping out" value-added resources from wastewater by bioelectrochemical systems: A review from energy perspectives.
Zou S; He Z
Water Res; 2018 Mar; 131():62-73. PubMed ID: 29274548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Microbial electrolysis cell scale-up for combined wastewater treatment and hydrogen production.
Gil-Carrera L; Escapa A; Mehta P; Santoyo G; Guiot SR; Morán A; Tartakovsky B
Bioresour Technol; 2013 Feb; 130():584-91. PubMed ID: 23334014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Microbial electrolysis cells turning to be versatile technology: recent advances and future challenges.
Zhang Y; Angelidaki I
Water Res; 2014 Jun; 56():11-25. PubMed ID: 24631941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Hydrogen production from continuous flow, microbial reverse-electrodialysis electrolysis cells treating fermentation wastewater.
Watson VJ; Hatzell M; Logan BE
Bioresour Technol; 2015 Nov; 195():51-6. PubMed ID: 26051523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Pyrosequencing reveals highly diverse microbial communities in microbial electrolysis cells involved in enhanced H2 production from waste activated sludge.
Lu L; Xing D; Ren N
Water Res; 2012 May; 46(7):2425-34. PubMed ID: 22374298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Electrochemical struvite precipitation from digestate with a fluidized bed cathode microbial electrolysis cell.
Cusick RD; Ullery ML; Dempsey BA; Logan BE
Water Res; 2014 May; 54():297-306. PubMed ID: 24583521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Influence of Nanomaterials and Other Factors on Biohydrogen Production Rates in Microbial Electrolysis Cells-A Review.
Abd-Elrahman NK; Al-Harbi N; Al-Hadeethi Y; Alruqi AB; Mohammed H; Umar A; Akbar S
Molecules; 2022 Dec; 27(23):. PubMed ID: 36500687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
