These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38658127)

  • 1. Beyond Mortality: Unveiling the Nuances of Quality of Life in Aortic Valve Interventions.
    Tarantini G; Nai Fovino L
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2024 Apr; 17(8):989-991. PubMed ID: 38658127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. When to SAVR in the age of TAVR? A perspective on surgical aortic valve replacement in 2018.
    Wyler von Ballmoos MC; Barker CM; Reul RM; Dadu R; Ramchandani M; Kleiman NS; Reardon MJ
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2018 Mar; 19(2):139-141. PubMed ID: 29661491
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A paradigm shift from surgical to transcutaneous aortic valve replacement (PARTNER 3 and Evolut Low Risk trials).
    Taggart DP
    Cardiovasc Res; 2019 Sep; 115(11):e107-e108. PubMed ID: 31436831
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Surgical Valve Replacement in Patients at High Risk for Surgery: A Study of Echocardiographic Change and Risk Prediction.
    Little SH; Oh JK; Gillam L; Sengupta PP; Orsinelli DA; Cavalcante JL; Chang JD; Adams DH; Zorn GL; Pollak AW; Abdelmoneim SS; Reardon MJ; Qiao H; Popma JJ
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jun; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 27313280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Durability and Clinical Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Failed Surgical Bioprostheses.
    Dauerman HL; Deeb GM; O'Hair DP; Waksman R; Yakubov SJ; Kleiman NS; Chetcuti SJ; Hermiller JB; Bajwa T; Khabbaz K; de Marchena E; Salerno T; Dries-Devlin JL; Li S; Popma JJ; Reardon MJ
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Oct; 12(10):e008155. PubMed ID: 31607151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The beginning of a new era in the field of percutaneous valvular interventions (PARTNER 3 and Evolut Low Risk trials).
    Dudek D
    Cardiovasc Res; 2019 Sep; 115(11):e105-e106. PubMed ID: 31436829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Outcomes of intermediate-risk patients treated with transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System: A single center 20-year experience.
    Garcia S; Kelly R; Mbai M; Gurevich S; Oestreich B; Yannopoulos D; Adabag S
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Aug; 92(2):390-398. PubMed ID: 29316204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Echocardiographic Results of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients: The PARTNER 3 Trial.
    Pibarot P; Salaun E; Dahou A; Avenatti E; Guzzetti E; Annabi MS; Toubal O; Bernier M; Beaudoin J; Ong G; Ternacle J; Krapf L; Thourani VH; Makkar R; Kodali SK; Russo M; Kapadia SR; Malaisrie SC; Cohen DJ; Leipsic J; Blanke P; Williams MR; McCabe JM; Brown DL; Babaliaros V; Goldman S; Szeto WY; Généreux P; Pershad A; Alu MC; Xu K; Rogers E; Webb JG; Smith CR; Mack MJ; Leon MB; Hahn RT;
    Circulation; 2020 May; 141(19):1527-1537. PubMed ID: 32272848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Complications After Self-expanding Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Conte JV; Hermiller J; Resar JR; Deeb GM; Gleason TG; Adams DH; Popma JJ; Yakubov SJ; Watson D; Guo J; Zorn GL; Reardon MJ
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2017 Autumn; 29(3):321-330. PubMed ID: 29195573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Superior to Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement?: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Pagnesi M; Chiarito M; Stefanini GG; Testa L; Reimers B; Colombo A; Latib A
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Sep; 10(18):1899-1901. PubMed ID: 28935083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Surgical-Risk Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized-Controlled Trials and Propensity-Matched Studies.
    Rawasia WF; Usman MS; Mujeeb FA; Zafar M; Khan SU; Alkhouli M
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2020 May; 21(5):612-618. PubMed ID: 31672536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients at low surgical risk: A meta-analysis of randomized trials and propensity score matched observational studies.
    Witberg G; Lador A; Yahav D; Kornowski R
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Aug; 92(2):408-416. PubMed ID: 29388308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Outcome of Patients with Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Kugelman N; Jaffe R; Aronson D; Sharoni E; Adawi S; Khader N; Shiran A
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2020 Mar; 21(3):257-262. PubMed ID: 31103371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Long-term survival after transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis: A meta-analysis of observational comparative studies with a propensity-score analysis.
    Takagi H; Mitta S; Ando T;
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Aug; 92(2):419-430. PubMed ID: 29388316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. 1-Year Results in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With Failed Surgical Bioprostheses.
    Deeb GM; Chetcuti SJ; Reardon MJ; Patel HJ; Grossman PM; Schreiber T; Forrest JK; Bajwa TK; O'Hair DP; Petrossian G; Robinson N; Katz S; Hartman A; Dauerman HL; Schmoker J; Khabbaz K; Watson DR; Yakubov SJ; Oh JK; Li S; Kleiman NS; Adams DH; Popma JJ
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 May; 10(10):1034-1044. PubMed ID: 28521921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgical aortic valve replacement in low-surgical-risk patients: An updated meta-analysis.
    Goel S; Pasam RT; Wats K; Patel J; Chava S; Gotesman J; Malik BA; Frankel R; Shani J; Gidwani U
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jul; 96(1):169-178. PubMed ID: 31631514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in low-risk surgical patients: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
    Kheiri B; Osman M; Abubakar H; Subahi A; Chahine A; Ahmed S; Bachuwa G; Alkotob ML; Hassan M; Bhatt DL
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2019 Oct; 20(10):838-842. PubMed ID: 30638890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Two-Year Outcomes in Patients With Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis Randomized to Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: The All-Comers Nordic Aortic Valve Intervention Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Søndergaard L; Steinbrüchel DA; Ihlemann N; Nissen H; Kjeldsen BJ; Petursson P; Ngo AT; Olsen NT; Chang Y; Franzen OW; Engstrøm T; Clemmensen P; Olsen PS; Thyregod HG
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jun; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 27296202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cochrane corner: transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis in people with low surgical risk.
    Kolkailah AA; Doukky R; Pelletier MP; Volgman AS; Kaneko T; Nabhan AF
    Heart; 2020 Jul; 106(14):1043-1045. PubMed ID: 32482670
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Low Surgical Risk Patients: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.
    Elgendy IY; Mahmoud AN; Gad MM; Elbadawi A; Rivero F; Alfonso F
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Jul; 12(14):1399-1401. PubMed ID: 31320035
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.