122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38658690)
1. Retractions are part of science, but misconduct isn't - lessons from a superconductivity lab.
Nature; 2024 Apr; 628(8009):689-690. PubMed ID: 38658690
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Collateral damage: How a case of misconduct brought a leading Japanese biology institute to its knees.
Cyranoski D
Nature; 2015 Apr; 520(7549):600-3. PubMed ID: 25925457
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Scientific misconduct: Research integrity guidelines in Japan.
Wada M
Nature; 2014 Oct; 514(7520):35. PubMed ID: 25279908
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Cooperate to stop misconduct.
Qualkenbush L
Nature; 2018 May; 557(7707):637. PubMed ID: 29849159
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The science of retraction.
Nat Neurosci; 2002 Dec; 5(12):1249. PubMed ID: 12447375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Misconduct is the main cause of life-sciences retractions.
Corbyn Z
Nature; 2012 Oct; 490(7418):21. PubMed ID: 23038445
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomedical paper retractions have quadrupled in 20 years - why?
Else H
Nature; 2024 Jun; 630(8016):280-281. PubMed ID: 38822109
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The 'self-plagiarism' oxymoron: can one steal from oneself?
Chrousos GP; Kalantaridou SN; Margioris AN; Gravanis A
Eur J Clin Invest; 2012 Mar; 42(3):231-2. PubMed ID: 22268677
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. 'Avalanche' of spider-paper retractions shakes behavioural-ecology community.
Viglione G
Nature; 2020 Feb; 578(7794):199-200. PubMed ID: 32047306
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Figure errors, sloppy science, and fraud: keeping eyes on your data.
Williams CL; Casadevall A; Jackson S
J Clin Invest; 2019 Mar; 129(5):1805-1807. PubMed ID: 30907748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Science publishing: The trouble with retractions.
Van Noorden R
Nature; 2011 Oct; 478(7367):26-8. PubMed ID: 21979026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Highly cited researcher banned from journal board for citation abuse.
Van Noorden R
Nature; 2020 Feb; 578(7794):200-201. PubMed ID: 32047304
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Korean scandal will have global fallout.
Check E; Cyranoski D
Nature; 2005 Dec; 438(7071):1056-7. PubMed ID: 16371963
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Retraction ends furore over cancer vaccine.
Abbott A
Nature; 2003 Sep; 425(6953):4. PubMed ID: 12955102
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A painful remedy.
Nature; 2010 Nov; 468(7320):6. PubMed ID: 21048718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Publication misconduct and plagiarism retractions: a Latin American perspective.
Alfaro-Toloza P; Mayta-Tristan P; Rodriguez-Morales AJ
Curr Med Res Opin; 2013 Feb; 29(2):99-100. PubMed ID: 23210610
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Peer-Review Fraud--Hacking the Scientific Publication Process.
Haug CJ
N Engl J Med; 2015 Dec; 373(25):2393-5. PubMed ID: 26488392
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Scientific communication during the current pandemic and some considerations on expressions of concern - retractions].
Vanegas L J; Villalón C M
Rev Med Chil; 2020 Sep; 148(9):1374-1375. PubMed ID: 33399718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. China's clampdown on fake-paper factories picks up speed.
Else H
Nature; 2021 Oct; 598(7879):19-20. PubMed ID: 34594025
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Improving the integrity of published science: An expanded taxonomy of retractions and corrections.
Fanelli D; Ioannidis JPA; Goodman S
Eur J Clin Invest; 2018 Apr; 48(4):. PubMed ID: 29369337
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
