135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38658912)
1. Item analysis: the impact of distractor efficiency on the difficulty index and discrimination power of multiple-choice items.
Rezigalla AA; Eleragi AMESA; Elhussein AB; Alfaifi J; ALGhamdi MA; Al Ameer AY; Yahia AIO; Mohammed OA; Adam MIE
BMC Med Educ; 2024 Apr; 24(1):445. PubMed ID: 38658912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Item and Test Analysis to Identify Quality Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs) from an Assessment of Medical Students of Ahmedabad, Gujarat.
Gajjar S; Sharma R; Kumar P; Rana M
Indian J Community Med; 2014 Jan; 39(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 24696535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analysis of one-best MCQs: the difficulty index, discrimination index and distractor efficiency.
Hingorjo MR; Jaleel F
J Pak Med Assoc; 2012 Feb; 62(2):142-7. PubMed ID: 22755376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Item analysis of multiple choice questions: A quality assurance test for an assessment tool.
Kumar D; Jaipurkar R; Shekhar A; Sikri G; Srinivas V
Med J Armed Forces India; 2021 Feb; 77(Suppl 1):S85-S89. PubMed ID: 33612937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of Multiple-Choice Questions by Item Analysis, from an Online Internal Assessment of 6
Bhattacherjee S; Mukherjee A; Bhandari K; Rout AJ
Indian J Community Med; 2022; 47(1):92-95. PubMed ID: 35368481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. AI in medical education: uses of AI in construction type A MCQs.
Rezigalla AA
BMC Med Educ; 2024 Mar; 24(1):247. PubMed ID: 38448870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relations of the Number of Functioning Distractors With the Item Difficulty Index and the Item Discrimination Power in the Multiple Choice Questions.
Chauhan GR; Chauhan BR; Vaza JV; Chauhan PR
Cureus; 2023 Jul; 15(7):e42492. PubMed ID: 37644928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Item analysis of in use multiple choice questions in pharmacology.
Kaur M; Singla S; Mahajan R
Int J Appl Basic Med Res; 2016; 6(3):170-3. PubMed ID: 27563581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative analysis of single best answer multiple choice questions in pharmaceutics.
Al Muhaissen SA; Ratka A; Akour A; AlKhatib HS
Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2019 Mar; 11(3):251-257. PubMed ID: 30904146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Item Analysis of Multiple Choice Questions at the Department of Paediatrics, Arabian Gulf University, Manama, Bahrain.
Kheyami D; Jaradat A; Al-Shibani T; Ali FA
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J; 2018 Feb; 18(1):e68-e74. PubMed ID: 29666684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of the Quality of Multiple-Choice Questions in the Surgery Course for an Integrated Curriculum, University of Bisha College of Medicine, Saudi Arabia.
Al Ameer AY
Cureus; 2023 Dec; 15(12):e50441. PubMed ID: 38222171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Nonfunctional distractor analysis: An indicator for quality of Multiple choice questions.
Sajjad M; Iltaf S; Khan RA
Pak J Med Sci; 2020; 36(5):982-986. PubMed ID: 32704275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Item analysis and optimizing multiple-choice questions for a viable question bank in ophthalmology: A cross-sectional study.
Bhat SK; Prasad KHL
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2021 Feb; 69(2):343-346. PubMed ID: 33463588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A psychometric analysis of a newly developed summative, multiple choice question assessment adapted from Canada to a Middle Eastern context.
Pawluk SA; Shah K; Minhas R; Rainkie D; Wilby KJ
Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2018 Aug; 10(8):1026-1032. PubMed ID: 30314537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The optimal number of options for multiple-choice questions on high-stakes tests: application of a revised index for detecting nonfunctional distractors.
Raymond MR; Stevens C; Bucak SD
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2019 Mar; 24(1):141-150. PubMed ID: 30362027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using Automatic Item Generation to Improve the Quality of MCQ Distractors.
Lai H; Gierl MJ; Touchie C; Pugh D; Boulais AP; De Champlain A
Teach Learn Med; 2016; 28(2):166-73. PubMed ID: 26849247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality of multiple-choice questions in medical internship qualification examination determined by item response theory at Debre Tabor University, Ethiopia.
Belay LM; Sendekie TY; Eyowas FA
BMC Med Educ; 2022 Aug; 22(1):635. PubMed ID: 35989323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How important is distractor efficiency for grading Best Answer Questions?
Puthiaparampil T; Rahman M
BMC Med Educ; 2021 Jan; 21(1):29. PubMed ID: 33413332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of 3- and 4-option multiple-choice items for medical subspecialty in-training examinations.
Chen D; Harman AE; Sun H; Ye T; Gaiser RR
BMC Med Educ; 2023 Apr; 23(1):286. PubMed ID: 37106417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Post-validation item analysis to assess the validity and reliability of multiple-choice questions at a medical college with an innovative curriculum.
Yahia AIO
Natl Med J India; 2021; 34(6):359-362. PubMed ID: 35818102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
