These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38659556)

  • 1. Comparative Evaluation of Marginal Leakage of Various Bevel Designs Using Direct Composite Restoration in Fractured Anterior Teeth: An In Vitro Study.
    Rajagopal S; Sharma S
    Cureus; 2024 Mar; 16(3):e56860. PubMed ID: 38659556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative evaluation of microleakage around Class V cavities restored with alkasite restorative material with and without bonding agent and flowable composite resin: An
    Meshram P; Meshram V; Palve D; Patil S; Gade V; Raut A
    Indian J Dent Res; 2019; 30(3):403-407. PubMed ID: 31397416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of light source position and bevel placement on facial margin adaptation of resin-based composite restorations.
    Hoelscher DC; Gregory WA; Linger JB; Pink FE
    Am J Dent; 2000 Aug; 13(4):171-5. PubMed ID: 11763925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative Assessment of Marginal Micro Leakage of Different Esthetic Restorative Materials Used on Primary Teeth: An
    Al Ghwainem A; Alqarni AS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2024 Jan; 25(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 38514432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of Microleakage and Marginal Ridge Fracture Resistance of Primary Molars Restored with Three Restorative Materials: A Comparative in vitro Study.
    Yeolekar TS; Chowdhary NR; Mukunda KS; Kiran NK
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2015; 8(2):108-13. PubMed ID: 26379377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of Class II Restoration Microleakage with Various Restorative Materials: A Comparative
    Pawar M; Saleem Agwan MA; Ghani B; Khatri M; Bopache P; Aziz MS
    J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2021 Nov; 13(Suppl 2):S1210-S1214. PubMed ID: 35017958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modification of the restoration protocol for resin-based composite (RBC) restoratives (conventional and bulk fill) on cuspal movement and microleakage score in molar teeth.
    Politi I; McHugh LEJ; Al-Fodeh RS; Fleming GJP
    Dent Mater; 2018 Sep; 34(9):1271-1277. PubMed ID: 29857989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of Microleakage Using Dye Penetration Method in Primary Teeth Restored with Tooth-colored Materials: An
    Punathil S; Almalki SA; AlJameel AH; Gowdar IM; Mc VA; Chinnari K
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Jul; 20(7):778-782. PubMed ID: 31597795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microleakage of Er:YAG laser and dental bur prepared cavities in primary teeth restored with different adhesive restorative materials.
    Baghalian A; Nakhjavani YB; Hooshmand T; Motahhary P; Bahramian H
    Lasers Med Sci; 2013 Nov; 28(6):1453-60. PubMed ID: 23135785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of microleakage in Class II cavities restored with silorane-based and methacrylate-based composite resins using different restorative techniques over time.
    Khosravi K; Mousavinasab SM; Samani MS
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2015; 12(2):150-6. PubMed ID: 25878680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparative evaluation of gingival microleakage and internal voids in Class II composite restoration with two different lining techniques: An
    Shishodia R; Goyal V; Shaikh A; Mahule A; Dondani J
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2022; 40(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 35439886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microleakage of composite resins in cavities of upper primary molars.
    Nozaka K; Suruga Y; Amari E
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 1999 Sep; 9(3):185-94. PubMed ID: 10815575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength and microleakage of tricalcium silicate-based restorative material and radioopaque posterior glass ionomer restorative cement in primary and permanent teeth: an in vitro study.
    Raju VG; Venumbaka NR; Mungara J; Vijayakumar P; Rajendran S; Elangovan A
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2014; 32(4):304-10. PubMed ID: 25231038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of a fiber-reinforcing technique for direct composite restorations of structurally compromised teeth on marginal microleakage.
    Sfeikos T; Dionysopoulos D; Kouros P; Naka O; Tolidis K
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Jun; 34(4):650-660. PubMed ID: 35233926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Microleakage of Class V Cavities restored with the Embrace WetBond Class V Composite Resin and Conventional Opallis Composite Resin.
    Tavangar M; Zohri Z; Sheikhnezhad H; Shahbeig S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Oct; 18(10):867-873. PubMed ID: 28989122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gingival microleakage of class II bulk-fill composite resin restorations.
    Behery H; El-Mowafy O; El-Badrawy W; Nabih S; Saleh B
    Dent Med Probl; 2018; 55(4):383-388. PubMed ID: 30648363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of a carbomer/fluoroapatite-enhanced glass-ionomer cement on primary teeth restorations.
    Tolidis K; Boutsiouki C; Gerasimou P
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep; 17(3):227-233. PubMed ID: 27759413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of Marginal Adaptation of Composite Restorations Reinforced with Novel Enamel Inserts (Biofillers) in Class V Cavities.
    Biradar N; Allappanavar KS; Shetty NK; Patil BS; Hegde RS; Moogi P
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Dec; 21(12):1368-1373. PubMed ID: 33893260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Necessity of bevels for box only Class II composite restorations.
    Opdam NJ; Roeters JJ; Kuijs R; Burgersdijk RC
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Sep; 80(3):274-9. PubMed ID: 9760359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of restorative technique, Bevelling and aging on composite bonding to sectioned incisal edges: A comparative in vitro study.
    Poojary PK; Bhandary S; Srinivasan R; Nasreen F; Pramod J; Mahesh M
    J Conserv Dent; 2013 Jan; 16(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 23349572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.