151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38659643)
1. A statistical shape analysis for the assessment of the main geometrical features of the distal femoral medullary canal.
Betti V; Aldieri A; Cristofolini L
Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2024; 12():1250095. PubMed ID: 38659643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Geometric variation of the human tibia-fibula: a public dataset of tibia-fibula surface meshes and statistical shape model.
Keast M; Bonacci J; Fox A
PeerJ; 2023; 11():e14708. PubMed ID: 36811007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development of a Statistical Shape Model and Assessment of Anatomical Shape Variations in the Hemipelvis.
van Veldhuizen WA; van der Wel H; Kuipers HY; Kraeima J; Ten Duis K; Wolterink JM; de Vries JPM; Schuurmann RCL; IJpma FFA
J Clin Med; 2023 May; 12(11):. PubMed ID: 37297962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intrinsic Measures and Shape Analysis of the Intratemporal Facial Nerve.
Hudson TJ; Gare B; Allen DG; Ladak HM; Agrawal SK
Otol Neurotol; 2020 Mar; 41(3):e378-e386. PubMed ID: 31917770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Statistical shape modeling of femur shape variability in female patients with hip dysplasia.
Gaffney BMM; Hillen TJ; Nepple JJ; Clohisy JC; Harris MD
J Orthop Res; 2019 Mar; 37(3):665-673. PubMed ID: 30656719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predicting Knee Joint Instability Using a Tibio-Femoral Statistical Shape Model.
Cerveri P; Belfatto A; Manzotti A
Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2020; 8():253. PubMed ID: 32363179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fully automatic segmentation of femurs with medullary canal definition in high and in low resolution CT scans.
Almeida DF; Ruben RB; Folgado J; Fernandes PR; Audenaert E; Verhegghe B; De Beule M
Med Eng Phys; 2016 Dec; 38(12):1474-1480. PubMed ID: 27751655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Representative 3D shape of the distal femur, modes of variation and relationship with abnormality of the trochlear region.
Cerveri P; Belfatto A; Manzotti A
J Biomech; 2019 Sep; 94():67-74. PubMed ID: 31378340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Statistical Shape Model of the Temporal Bone Using Segmentation Propagation.
Ding AS; Lu A; Li Z; Galaiya D; Ishii M; Siewerdsen JH; Taylor RH; Creighton FX
Otol Neurotol; 2022 Jul; 43(6):e679-e687. PubMed ID: 35761465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fully automatic segmentation of the femur from 3D-CT images using primitive shape recognition and statistical shape models.
Ben Younes L; Nakajima Y; Saito T
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2014 Mar; 9(2):189-96. PubMed ID: 24101434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Measurement of proximal femoral morphology and analysis of 500 cases in Hunan Province].
Pi Y; Zhao Y; Wang W; He Z; Mao X
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2013 Sep; 38(9):925-30. PubMed ID: 24071692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Increasing shape modelling accuracy by adjusting for subject positioning: an application to the analysis of radiographic proximal femur symmetry using data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.
Lindner C; Wallis GA; Cootes TF
Bone; 2014 Apr; 61(100):64-70. PubMed ID: 24440168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cortical encroachment after cephalomedullary nailing of the proximal femur: evaluation of a more anatomic radius of curvature.
Bazylewicz DB; Egol KA; Koval KJ
J Orthop Trauma; 2013 Jun; 27(6):303-7. PubMed ID: 23287752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-dimensional morphological study of the proximal femur in Crowe type IV developmental dysplasia of the hip.
Yang Y; Liao W; Yi W; Jiang H; Fu G; Ma Y; Zheng Q
J Orthop Surg Res; 2021 Oct; 16(1):621. PubMed ID: 34663420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Anatomically Parameterized Statistical Shape Model: Explaining Morphometry Through Statistical Learning.
Boutillon A; Salhi A; Burdin V; Borotikar B
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2022 Sep; 69(9):2733-2744. PubMed ID: 35192459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A shape-partitioned statistical shape model for highly deformed femurs using X-ray images.
Chien J; Ha HG; Lee S; Hong J
Comput Assist Surg (Abingdon); 2022 Dec; 27(1):50-62. PubMed ID: 36510708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analysis of the three-dimensional anatomical variance of the distal radius using 3D shape models.
Baumbach SF; Binder J; Synek A; Mück FG; Chevalier Y; Euler E; Langs G; Fischer L
BMC Med Imaging; 2017 Mar; 17(1):23. PubMed ID: 28274212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Statistical shape modeling of cam femoroacetabular impingement.
Harris MD; Datar M; Whitaker RT; Jurrus ER; Peters CL; Anderson AE
J Orthop Res; 2013 Oct; 31(10):1620-6. PubMed ID: 23832798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-dimensional morphologic features of Asian atypical femur and clinical implications of cephalomedullary nail fixation: Computational measurement at actual size.
Lee KJ; Kim BS; Kim KT; Jung GH
Injury; 2022 Dec; 53(12):4090-4098. PubMed ID: 36207153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
