144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38663226)
1. Comparison of refractive outcomes obtained with two swept-source OCT-based optical biometers after cataract surgery: A study of 152 eyes.
Agard E; Levron A; Billant J; Douma I; Dot C
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2024 Jun; 47(6):104186. PubMed ID: 38663226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of two biometers: A swept-source optical coherence tomography and an optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer.
El Chehab H; Agard E; Dot C
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2019 Sep; 29(5):547-554. PubMed ID: 30295063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of pharmacological pupil dilation on measurements and iol power calculation made using the new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer.
Arriola-Villalobos P; Almendral-Gómez J; Garzón N; Ruiz-Medrano J; Fernández-Pérez C; Martínez-de-la-Casa JM; Díaz-Valle D
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2016 Dec; 39(10):859-865. PubMed ID: 27793471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Refractive prediction of four different intraocular lens calculation formulas compared between new swept source optical coherence tomography and partial coherence interferometry.
Song MY; Noh SR; Kim KY
PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0251152. PubMed ID: 33945581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Agreement and clinical comparison between a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer and an optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer.
Arriola-Villalobos P; Almendral-Gómez J; Garzón N; Ruiz-Medrano J; Fernández-Pérez C; Martínez-de-la-Casa JM; Díaz-Valle D
Eye (Lond); 2017 Mar; 31(3):437-442. PubMed ID: 27834962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative analysis of two optical biometry devices: high wavelength swept source OCT versus partial coherence interferometry.
Szalai E; Csutak A
Int Ophthalmol; 2022 Feb; 42(2):627-634. PubMed ID: 34633606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of refractive outcomes using conventional keratometry or total keratometry for IOL power calculation in cataract surgery.
Srivannaboon S; Chirapapaisan C
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2019 Dec; 257(12):2677-2682. PubMed ID: 31486917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulas using a swept-source optical biometer.
Kim SY; Lee SH; Kim NR; Chin HS; Jung JW
PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227638. PubMed ID: 31935241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of a New Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometer for IOL Power Calculation and Comparison to IOLMaster.
Savini G; Hoffer KJ; Shammas HJ; Aramberri J; Huang J; Barboni P
J Refract Surg; 2017 Oct; 33(10):690-695. PubMed ID: 28991337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lower refractive prediction accuracy of total keratometry using intraocular lens formulas loaded onto a swept-source optical biometer.
Danjo Y; Ohji R; Maeno S
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2023 Jan; 261(1):137-146. PubMed ID: 35881200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Agreement of intraocular lens power calculation between 2 SS-OCT-based biometers.
Pfaeffli OA; Weber A; Hoffer KJ; Savini G; Baenninger PB; Thiel MA; Taroni L; Müller L
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2022 May; 48(5):535-541. PubMed ID: 34417784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Refractive Prediction Accuracy With Three Optical Devices.
Cheng SM; Li X; Zhang JS; Mei JQ; Shi GL; Lin J; Li TT; Yu AY
J Refract Surg; 2023 Jan; 39(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 36630430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of 2 optical biometers and evaluation of the Camellin-Calossi intraocular lens formula for normal cataractous eyes.
Suto C; Shimamura E; Watanabe I
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Nov; 41(11):2366-72. PubMed ID: 26703484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of anterior segment parameters and axial length measurements performed on a Scheimpflug device with biometry function and a reference optical biometer.
Muzyka-Woźniak M; Oleszko A
Int Ophthalmol; 2019 May; 39(5):1115-1122. PubMed ID: 29700651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biometry and intraocular lens power calculation results with a new optical biometry device: comparison with the gold standard.
Kaswin G; Rousseau A; Mgarrech M; Barreau E; Labetoulle M
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Apr; 40(4):593-600. PubMed ID: 24680520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Repeatability of a new swept-source optical coherence tomographer and agreement with other three optical biometers.
Cheng SM; Zhang JS; Shao X; Wu ZT; Li TT; Wang P; Lin JH; Yu AY
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2022 Jul; 260(7):2271-2281. PubMed ID: 35171331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of 2 modern swept-source optical biometers-IOLMaster 700 and Anterion.
Langenbucher A; Szentmáry N; Cayless A; Wendelstein J; Hoffmann P
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2023 Apr; 261(4):999-1010. PubMed ID: 36307658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of swept-source optical coherence tomography based biometry for intraocular lens power calculation: a retrospective cross-sectional study.
An Y; Kang EK; Kim H; Kang MJ; Byun YS; Joo CK
BMC Ophthalmol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):30. PubMed ID: 30678658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Refractive predictability using two optical biometers and refraction types for intraocular lens power calculation in cataract surgery.
Cheng H; Li J; Cheng B; Wu M
Int Ophthalmol; 2020 Jul; 40(7):1849-1856. PubMed ID: 32297050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing the Validity of Measurements of Swept-source and Partial Coherence Interferometry Devices in Cataract Patients.
Ghaffari R; Mahmoudzadeh R; Mohammadi SS; Salabati M; Latifi G; Ghassemi H
Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Oct; 96(10):745-750. PubMed ID: 31592957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
