These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38664810)
1. Care-receivers with physical disabilities' perceptions on having humanoid assistive robots as assistants: a qualitative study. Sørensen L; Johannesen DT; Melkas H; Johnsen HM BMC Health Serv Res; 2024 Apr; 24(1):523. PubMed ID: 38664810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robots to assist daily activities: views of older adults with Alzheimer's disease and their caregivers. Wang RH; Sudhama A; Begum M; Huq R; Mihailidis A Int Psychogeriatr; 2017 Jan; 29(1):67-79. PubMed ID: 27660047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Developing assistive robots for people with mild cognitive impairment and mild dementia: a qualitative study with older adults and experts in aged care. Law M; Sutherland C; Ahn HS; MacDonald BA; Peri K; Johanson DL; Vajsakovic DS; Kerse N; Broadbent E BMJ Open; 2019 Sep; 9(9):e031937. PubMed ID: 31551392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Learning to teleoperate an upper-limb assistive humanoid robot for bimanual daily-living tasks. Connan M; Sierotowicz M; Henze B; Porges O; Albu-Schäffer A; Roa MA; Castellini C Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2021 Dec; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 34757953 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Stakeholders' Perceptions Sought to Inform the Development of a Low-Cost Mobile Robot for Older Adults: A Qualitative Descriptive Study. Sefcik JS; Johnson MJ; Yim M; Lau T; Vivio N; Mucchiani C; Cacchione PZ Clin Nurs Res; 2018 Feb; 27(1):61-80. PubMed ID: 28918654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Effects of Stakeholder Perceptions on the Use of Humanoid Robots in Care for Older Adults: Postinteraction Cross-Sectional Study. Tobis S; Piasek-Skupna J; Neumann-Podczaska A; Suwalska A; Wieczorowska-Tobis K J Med Internet Res; 2023 Aug; 25():e46617. PubMed ID: 37540548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assistive robots to improve the independent living of older persons: results from a needs study. Fiorini L; De Mul M; Fabbricotti I; Limosani R; Vitanza A; D'Onofrio G; Tsui M; Sancarlo D; Giuliani F; Greco A; Guiot D; Senges E; Cavallo F Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2021 Jan; 16(1):92-102. PubMed ID: 31329000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Enablers and barriers to the implementation of socially assistive humanoid robots in health and social care: a systematic review. Papadopoulos I; Koulouglioti C; Lazzarino R; Ali S BMJ Open; 2020 Jan; 10(1):e033096. PubMed ID: 31924639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Meta-Analysis on Remote HRI and In-Person HRI: What Is a Socially Assistive Robot to Do? Liang N; Nejat G Sensors (Basel); 2022 Sep; 22(19):. PubMed ID: 36236261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Age-Related Differences in the Uncanny Valley Effect. Tu YC; Chien SE; Yeh SL Gerontology; 2020; 66(4):382-392. PubMed ID: 32526760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Voice Control Interface Prototype for Assistive Robots for People Living with Upper Limb Disabilities. Poirier S; Routhier F; Campeau-Lecours A IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2019 Jun; 2019():46-52. PubMed ID: 31374605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Care Providers' Perspectives on the Design of Assistive Persuasive Behaviors for Socially Assistive Robots. Getson C; Nejat G J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2024 Aug; 25(8):105084. PubMed ID: 38880121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Humanoid robots for assisting people with physical disabilities in activities of daily living: a scoping review. Sørensen L; Johannesen DT; Johnsen HM Assist Technol; 2024 May; ():1-17. PubMed ID: 38709552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. ROAD: domestic assistant and rehabilitation robot. Carrera I; Moreno HA; Saltarén R; Pérez C; Puglisi L; Garcia C Med Biol Eng Comput; 2011 Oct; 49(10):1201-11. PubMed ID: 21789672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Acceptance of an assistive robot in older adults: a mixed-method study of human-robot interaction over a 1-month period in the Living Lab setting. Wu YH; Wrobel J; Cornuet M; Kerhervé H; Damnée S; Rigaud AS Clin Interv Aging; 2014; 9():801-11. PubMed ID: 24855349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The impact of assistive living technology on perceived independence of people with a physical disability in executing daily activities: a systematic literature review. van Dam K; Gielissen M; Bles R; van der Poel A; Boon B Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2024 May; 19(4):1262-1271. PubMed ID: 36628433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Which activities threaten independent living of elderly when becoming problematic: inspiration for meaningful service robot functionality. Bedaf S; Gelderblom GJ; Syrdal DS; Lehmann H; Michel H; Hewson D; Amirabdollahian F; Dautenhahn K; de Witte L Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2014 Nov; 9(6):445-52. PubMed ID: 24083779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Attitudes of the elderly living independently towards the use of robots to assist with activities of daily living. Huang T; Huang C Work; 2021; 69(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 34024801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mobile Robotic Balance Assistant (MRBA): a gait assistive and fall intervention robot for daily living. Li L; Foo MJ; Chen J; Tan KY; Cai J; Swaminathan R; Chua KSG; Wee SK; Kuah CWK; Zhuo H; Ang WT J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2023 Mar; 20(1):29. PubMed ID: 36859286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]