184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38664810)
1. Care-receivers with physical disabilities' perceptions on having humanoid assistive robots as assistants: a qualitative study.
Sørensen L; Johannesen DT; Melkas H; Johnsen HM
BMC Health Serv Res; 2024 Apr; 24(1):523. PubMed ID: 38664810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robots to assist daily activities: views of older adults with Alzheimer's disease and their caregivers.
Wang RH; Sudhama A; Begum M; Huq R; Mihailidis A
Int Psychogeriatr; 2017 Jan; 29(1):67-79. PubMed ID: 27660047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Developing assistive robots for people with mild cognitive impairment and mild dementia: a qualitative study with older adults and experts in aged care.
Law M; Sutherland C; Ahn HS; MacDonald BA; Peri K; Johanson DL; Vajsakovic DS; Kerse N; Broadbent E
BMJ Open; 2019 Sep; 9(9):e031937. PubMed ID: 31551392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Learning to teleoperate an upper-limb assistive humanoid robot for bimanual daily-living tasks.
Connan M; Sierotowicz M; Henze B; Porges O; Albu-Schäffer A; Roa MA; Castellini C
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2021 Dec; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 34757953
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Stakeholders' Perceptions Sought to Inform the Development of a Low-Cost Mobile Robot for Older Adults: A Qualitative Descriptive Study.
Sefcik JS; Johnson MJ; Yim M; Lau T; Vivio N; Mucchiani C; Cacchione PZ
Clin Nurs Res; 2018 Feb; 27(1):61-80. PubMed ID: 28918654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Effects of Stakeholder Perceptions on the Use of Humanoid Robots in Care for Older Adults: Postinteraction Cross-Sectional Study.
Tobis S; Piasek-Skupna J; Neumann-Podczaska A; Suwalska A; Wieczorowska-Tobis K
J Med Internet Res; 2023 Aug; 25():e46617. PubMed ID: 37540548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assistive robots to improve the independent living of older persons: results from a needs study.
Fiorini L; De Mul M; Fabbricotti I; Limosani R; Vitanza A; D'Onofrio G; Tsui M; Sancarlo D; Giuliani F; Greco A; Guiot D; Senges E; Cavallo F
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2021 Jan; 16(1):92-102. PubMed ID: 31329000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Enablers and barriers to the implementation of socially assistive humanoid robots in health and social care: a systematic review.
Papadopoulos I; Koulouglioti C; Lazzarino R; Ali S
BMJ Open; 2020 Jan; 10(1):e033096. PubMed ID: 31924639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Meta-Analysis on Remote HRI and In-Person HRI: What Is a Socially Assistive Robot to Do?
Liang N; Nejat G
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Sep; 22(19):. PubMed ID: 36236261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Age-Related Differences in the Uncanny Valley Effect.
Tu YC; Chien SE; Yeh SL
Gerontology; 2020; 66(4):382-392. PubMed ID: 32526760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Voice Control Interface Prototype for Assistive Robots for People Living with Upper Limb Disabilities.
Poirier S; Routhier F; Campeau-Lecours A
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2019 Jun; 2019():46-52. PubMed ID: 31374605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Smartphone accessibility: understanding the lived experience of users with cervical spinal cord injuries.
Armstrong-Wood R; Messiou C; Kite A; Joyce E; Panousis S; Campbell H; Lauriau A; Manning J; Carlson T
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2024 May; 19(4):1434-1445. PubMed ID: 37010939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Humanoid robots for assisting people with physical disabilities in activities of daily living: a scoping review.
Sørensen L; Johannesen DT; Johnsen HM
Assist Technol; 2024 May; ():1-17. PubMed ID: 38709552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. ROAD: domestic assistant and rehabilitation robot.
Carrera I; Moreno HA; Saltarén R; Pérez C; Puglisi L; Garcia C
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2011 Oct; 49(10):1201-11. PubMed ID: 21789672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Acceptance of an assistive robot in older adults: a mixed-method study of human-robot interaction over a 1-month period in the Living Lab setting.
Wu YH; Wrobel J; Cornuet M; Kerhervé H; Damnée S; Rigaud AS
Clin Interv Aging; 2014; 9():801-11. PubMed ID: 24855349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The impact of assistive living technology on perceived independence of people with a physical disability in executing daily activities: a systematic literature review.
van Dam K; Gielissen M; Bles R; van der Poel A; Boon B
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2024 May; 19(4):1262-1271. PubMed ID: 36628433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Which activities threaten independent living of elderly when becoming problematic: inspiration for meaningful service robot functionality.
Bedaf S; Gelderblom GJ; Syrdal DS; Lehmann H; Michel H; Hewson D; Amirabdollahian F; Dautenhahn K; de Witte L
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2014 Nov; 9(6):445-52. PubMed ID: 24083779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Attitudes of the elderly living independently towards the use of robots to assist with activities of daily living.
Huang T; Huang C
Work; 2021; 69(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 34024801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mobile Robotic Balance Assistant (MRBA): a gait assistive and fall intervention robot for daily living.
Li L; Foo MJ; Chen J; Tan KY; Cai J; Swaminathan R; Chua KSG; Wee SK; Kuah CWK; Zhuo H; Ang WT
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2023 Mar; 20(1):29. PubMed ID: 36859286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Caregiver perspectives on a smart home-based socially assistive robot for individuals with Alzheimer's disease and related dementia.
Arthanat S; Begum M; Gu T; LaRoche DP; Xu D; Zhang N
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2020 Oct; 15(7):789-798. PubMed ID: 32299272
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
