BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

71 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38664810)

  • 21. A Meta-Analysis on Remote HRI and In-Person HRI: What Is a Socially Assistive Robot to Do?
    Liang N; Nejat G
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Sep; 22(19):. PubMed ID: 36236261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Humanoid robots for assisting people with physical disabilities in activities of daily living: a scoping review.
    Sørensen L; Johannesen DT; Johnsen HM
    Assist Technol; 2024 May; ():1-17. PubMed ID: 38709552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Care-receivers with physical disabilities' perceptions on having humanoid assistive robots as assistants: a qualitative study.
    Sørensen L; Johannesen DT; Melkas H; Johnsen HM
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2024 Apr; 24(1):523. PubMed ID: 38664810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Robots to assist daily activities: views of older adults with Alzheimer's disease and their caregivers.
    Wang RH; Sudhama A; Begum M; Huq R; Mihailidis A
    Int Psychogeriatr; 2017 Jan; 29(1):67-79. PubMed ID: 27660047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Developing assistive robots for people with mild cognitive impairment and mild dementia: a qualitative study with older adults and experts in aged care.
    Law M; Sutherland C; Ahn HS; MacDonald BA; Peri K; Johanson DL; Vajsakovic DS; Kerse N; Broadbent E
    BMJ Open; 2019 Sep; 9(9):e031937. PubMed ID: 31551392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Learning to teleoperate an upper-limb assistive humanoid robot for bimanual daily-living tasks.
    Connan M; Sierotowicz M; Henze B; Porges O; Albu-Schäffer A; Roa MA; Castellini C
    Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2021 Dec; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 34757953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Stakeholders' Perceptions Sought to Inform the Development of a Low-Cost Mobile Robot for Older Adults: A Qualitative Descriptive Study.
    Sefcik JS; Johnson MJ; Yim M; Lau T; Vivio N; Mucchiani C; Cacchione PZ
    Clin Nurs Res; 2018 Feb; 27(1):61-80. PubMed ID: 28918654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Effects of Stakeholder Perceptions on the Use of Humanoid Robots in Care for Older Adults: Postinteraction Cross-Sectional Study.
    Tobis S; Piasek-Skupna J; Neumann-Podczaska A; Suwalska A; Wieczorowska-Tobis K
    J Med Internet Res; 2023 Aug; 25():e46617. PubMed ID: 37540548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. I Know My Rights! A Longitudinal Study of Discrimination due to Physical Inaccessibility from the Perspective of Wheelchair Users.
    Baudin K; Pettersson C
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2023 Aug; 306():403-408. PubMed ID: 37638942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Lio-A Personal Robot Assistant for Human-Robot Interaction and Care Applications.
    Miseikis J; Caroni P; Duchamp P; Gasser A; Marko R; Miseikiene N; Zwilling F; de Castelbajac C; Eicher L; Fruh M; Fruh H
    IEEE Robot Autom Lett; 2020 Oct; 5(4):5339-5346. PubMed ID: 34192136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Older adults' experiences with and perceptions of the use of socially assistive robots in aged care: A systematic review of quantitative evidence.
    Vandemeulebroucke T; Dzi K; Gastmans C
    Arch Gerontol Geriatr; 2021; 95():104399. PubMed ID: 33813208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Humanoid robots in the care of older persons: A scoping review.
    Andtfolk M; Nyholm L; Eide H; Fagerström L
    Assist Technol; 2022 Sep; 34(5):518-526. PubMed ID: 33481675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Can robots tackle late-life loneliness? Scanning of future opportunities and challenges in assisted living facilities.
    Pirhonen J; Tiilikainen E; Pekkarinen S; Lemivaara M; Melkas H
    Futures; 2020 Dec; 124():102640. PubMed ID: 33041358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Enablers and barriers to the implementation of socially assistive humanoid robots in health and social care: a systematic review.
    Papadopoulos I; Koulouglioti C; Lazzarino R; Ali S
    BMJ Open; 2020 Jan; 10(1):e033096. PubMed ID: 31924639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Impacts of robot implementation on care personnel and clients in elderly-care institutions.
    Melkas H; Hennala L; Pekkarinen S; Kyrki V
    Int J Med Inform; 2020 Feb; 134():104041. PubMed ID: 31838291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A system for bedside assistance that integrates a robotic bed and a mobile manipulator.
    Kapusta AS; Grice PM; Clever HM; Chitalia Y; Park D; Kemp CC
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0221854. PubMed ID: 31618205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Older Users' Acceptance of an Assistive Robot: Attitudinal Changes Following Brief Exposure.
    Beer JM; Prakash A; Smarr CA; Chen TL; Hawkins K; Nguyen H; Deyle T; Mitzner TL; Kemp CC; Rogers WA
    Gerontechnology; 2017 Mar; 16(1):21-36. PubMed ID: 31178671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. In-home and remote use of robotic body surrogates by people with profound motor deficits.
    Grice PM; Kemp CC
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0212904. PubMed ID: 30875377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.