These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3866526)

  • 1. Clinical performance of three restorative materials for non-undercut cervical abrasion lesions.
    Tyas MJ; Beech DR
    Aust Dent J; 1985 Aug; 30(4):260-4. PubMed ID: 3866526
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Alternative cavity preparations with the use of composites and glass ionomer cements in primary Class II lesions].
    Nordbø H
    Nor Tannlaegeforen Tid; 1987 Mar; 97(5):188-93. PubMed ID: 3475671
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Options in restorative dentistry: resin-modified glass ionomers.
    Nazarian A
    Dent Today; 2009 Jul; 28(7):114-5. PubMed ID: 19630283
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives.
    Khoroushi M; Karvandi TM; Kamali B; Mazaheri H
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 23059577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. New concepts in cosmetic dentistry using glass-ionomer cements and composites.
    McLean JW
    CDA J; 1986 Apr; 14(4):20-5, 27. PubMed ID: 3457639
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Two-year clinical study on postoperative pulpal complications arising from the absence of a glass-ionomer lining in deep occlusal resin-composite restorations.
    Banomyong D; Messer H
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2013 Nov; 4(4):265-70. PubMed ID: 23355492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Reinforced glass ionomer restorations in modified Class II cavities].
    Valenzuela V; Stanke F
    Odontol Chil; 1989 Apr; 37(1):209-13. PubMed ID: 2518367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of a glass ionomer cement and a microfilled composite resin in the treatment of root surface caries.
    Levy SM; Jenson ME; Doering JV; Sheth JJ
    Gen Dent; 1989; 37(6):468-72. PubMed ID: 2534806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial.
    Banomyong D; Harnirattisai C; Burrow MF
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inhibition of artificial secondary caries in root by fluoride-releasing restorative materials.
    Torii Y; Itota T; Okamoto M; Nakabo S; Nagamine M; Inoue K
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 11203775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sensitivity restored of Class V abrasion/erosion lesions.
    Powell LV; Gordon GE; Johnson GH
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1990 Dec; 121(6):694-6. PubMed ID: 2148943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Composite resin and glass-ionomer cement: current status for use in cervical restorations.
    Brackett WW; Robinson PB
    Quintessence Int; 1990 Jun; 21(6):445-7. PubMed ID: 2243948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microleakage of glass ionomer cement and composite resin restorations in cut non-retentive preparations and pre-existing cervical erosion/abrasion lesions.
    Kaplan I; Harris EF; Mincer HH; Gilpatrick RO
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1993 Apr; 73(2):24-8. PubMed ID: 8309244
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The clinical evaluation of glass ionomer cements and microfilled composite resins in the treatment of cervical lesions of the teeth (confirmed with scanning electron microscopy).
    Shahani DR; Kolwalkar NS
    J Indian Dent Assoc; 1986 Jan; 58(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 3457864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions.
    Ermiş RB
    Quintessence Int; 2002; 33(7):542-8. PubMed ID: 12165991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Randomized clinical trial of adhesive restorations in primary molars. 18-month results.
    Casagrande L; Dalpian DM; Ardenghi TM; Zanatta FB; Balbinot CE; García-Godoy F; De Araujo FB
    Am J Dent; 2013 Dec; 26(6):351-5. PubMed ID: 24640441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cermet cements.
    McLean JW
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1990 Jan; 120(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 2104882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microleakage of high-strength glass ionomer: resin composite restorations in minimally invasive treatment.
    Platt JA; Rhodes B
    J Indiana Dent Assoc; 2001-2002 Winter; 80(4):20-2. PubMed ID: 12061017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nanomicrohybrid composites make posterior placement easier.
    Vargas M
    Dent Today; 2012 May; 31(5):128, 130-1. PubMed ID: 22650094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Restorative dental treatment of a canine tooth in a Bornean orang utan.
    Purmal K; Nambiar P
    J Vet Dent; 2009; 26(1):36-9. PubMed ID: 19476086
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.