142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38666418)
1. Wastewater management decision-making: A literature review and synthesis.
Ko D; Norton JW; Daigger GT
Water Environ Res; 2024 Apr; 96(4):e11024. PubMed ID: 38666418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Social life cycle assessment and participatory approaches: A methodological proposal applied to citrus farming in Southern Italy.
De Luca AI; Iofrida N; Strano A; Falcone G; Gulisano G
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2015 Jul; 11(3):383-96. PubMed ID: 25556911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sensitivity of operational and environmental benchmarks of retail stores to decision-makers' preferences through Data Envelopment Analysis.
Álvarez-Rodríguez C; Martín-Gamboa M; Iribarren D
Sci Total Environ; 2020 May; 718():137330. PubMed ID: 32097840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of expert opinions on the selection of wastewater treatment alternatives: a group decision-making approach.
Kalbar PP; Karmakar S; Asolekar SR
J Environ Manage; 2013 Oct; 128():844-51. PubMed ID: 23872214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MCDA-DEA approach to construct a composite indicator for effluents from WWTPs considering the influence of PPCPs.
Bellver-Domingo Á; Fuentes R; Hernández-Sancho F; Carmona E; Picó Y; Hernández-Chover V
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Apr; 30(16):47234-47247. PubMed ID: 36735130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multiple stakeholders in multi-criteria decision-making in the context of Municipal Solid Waste Management: A review.
Soltani A; Hewage K; Reza B; Sadiq R
Waste Manag; 2015 Jan; 35():318-28. PubMed ID: 25301545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of wastewater treatment alternatives for small communities: An analytic network process approach.
Molinos-Senante M; Gómez T; Caballero R; Hernández-Sancho F; Sala-Garrido R
Sci Total Environ; 2015 Nov; 532():676-87. PubMed ID: 26119382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The impact of household connection to public network wastewater systems: regulatory impact assessment.
de Carvalho BE; Costa SAB; Marques RC; Netto OC
Water Sci Technol; 2019 Mar; 79(6):1060-1070. PubMed ID: 31070586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Developing a model based decision support tool for the identification of sustainable treatment options for domestic wastewater.
Balkema AJ; Preisig HA; Otterpohl R; Lambert AJ; Weijers SR
Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(7):265-70. PubMed ID: 11385856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A scenario-based MCDA framework for wastewater infrastructure planning under uncertainty.
Zheng J; Egger C; Lienert J
J Environ Manage; 2016 Dec; 183(Pt 3):895-908. PubMed ID: 27666649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of land suitability for olive mill wastewater disposal site selection by integrating fuzzy logic, AHP, and WLC in a GIS.
Aydi A; Abichou T; Nasr IH; Louati M; Zairi M
Environ Monit Assess; 2016 Jan; 188(1):59. PubMed ID: 26711812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Decision making software for effective selection of treatment train alternative for wastewater using analytical hierarchy process.
Prasad AD; Tembhurkar AR
J Environ Sci Eng; 2013 Oct; 55(4):397-408. PubMed ID: 25906585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A novel fuzzy framework for technology selection of sustainable wastewater treatment plants based on TODIM methodology in developing urban areas.
Eseoglu G; Yapsakli K; Tozan H; Vayvay O
Sci Rep; 2022 May; 12(1):8800. PubMed ID: 35614159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing the sustainability of small wastewater treatment systems: a composite indicator approach.
Molinos-Senante M; Gómez T; Garrido-Baserba M; Caballero R; Sala-Garrido R
Sci Total Environ; 2014 Nov; 497-498():607-617. PubMed ID: 25169875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of a decision support tool for wastewater treatment selection.
Castillo A; Porro J; Garrido-Baserba M; Rosso D; Renzi D; Fatone F; Gómez V; Comas J; Poch M
J Environ Manage; 2016 Dec; 184(Pt 2):409-418. PubMed ID: 27742150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The use of multi-criteria decision analysis to tackle waste management problems: a literature review.
Achillas C; Moussiopoulos N; Karagiannidis A; Banias G; Perkoulidis G
Waste Manag Res; 2013 Feb; 31(2):115-29. PubMed ID: 23315368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Group decision making with the analytic hierarchy process in benefit-risk assessment: a tutorial.
Hummel JM; Bridges JF; IJzerman MJ
Patient; 2014; 7(2):129-40. PubMed ID: 24623191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Indicator based multi-criteria decision support systems for wastewater treatment plants.
Renfrew D; Vasilaki V; Katsou E
Sci Total Environ; 2024 Mar; 915():169903. PubMed ID: 38199342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Application of the analytic hierarchy process to the analysis of wastewater nutrient recycling options: a case based on a group study of residents in the city of Zurich.
Contreras F; Hanaki K; Aramaki T; Binder CR
Water Sci Technol; 2013; 68(12):2645-53. PubMed ID: 24355853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
