These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38666728)

  • 1. Digest: Sexual selection may shape species' range limits.
    Sinclair OR; Taberer TR
    Evolution; 2024 May; 78(6):1201-1202. PubMed ID: 38666728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sexual selection and mate limitation shape evolution of species' range limits.
    Tschol M; Reid JM; Bocedi G
    Evolution; 2024 May; 78(5):951-963. PubMed ID: 38416475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sexual selection and the ascent of women: Mate choice research since Darwin.
    Rosenthal GG; Ryan MJ
    Science; 2022 Jan; 375(6578):eabi6308. PubMed ID: 35050648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evolutionary interactions between thermal ecology and sexual selection.
    Leith NT; Fowler-Finn KD; Moore MP
    Ecol Lett; 2022 Sep; 25(9):1919-1936. PubMed ID: 35831230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Digest: When sexual selection hits the wall of natural selection.
    O'Loughlin BS; Marcondes RS
    Evolution; 2024 Jul; 78(7):1347-1348. PubMed ID: 38716650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Within-population variation in female mating preference affects the opportunity for sexual selection and the evolution of male traits, but things are not as simple as expected.
    Millan CH; Machado G; Muniz DG
    J Evol Biol; 2020 Nov; 33(11):1579-1592. PubMed ID: 32871625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Male mate choice, male quality, and the potential for sexual selection on female traits under polygyny.
    Fitzpatrick CL; Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2017 Jan; 71(1):174-183. PubMed ID: 27804119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mate sampling influences the intensity of sexual selection and the evolution of costly sexual ornaments.
    Muniz DG; Machado G
    J Theor Biol; 2018 Jun; 447():74-83. PubMed ID: 29567325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Fisher process of sexual selection with the coevolution of preference strength.
    Xu K; Lerch BA; Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2023 Apr; 77(4):1043-1055. PubMed ID: 36757067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evolution of choosiness dictates whether search costs of mate choice enhance speciation by sexual selection.
    Yukilevich R; Aoki F
    J Evol Biol; 2022 Aug; 35(8):1045-1059. PubMed ID: 35830473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intraspecific mating system evolution and its effect on complex male secondary sexual traits: Does male-male competition increase selection on size or shape?
    Baur J; Roy J; Schäfer MA; Puniamoorthy N; Blanckenhorn WU; Rohner PT
    J Evol Biol; 2020 Mar; 33(3):297-308. PubMed ID: 31701605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interplay between male quality and male-female compatibility across episodes of sexual selection.
    Mahdjoub H; Khelifa R; Roy J; Sbilordo SH; Zeender V; Perdigón Ferreira J; Gourgoulianni N; Lüpold S
    Sci Adv; 2023 Sep; 9(39):eadf5559. PubMed ID: 37774022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Runaway sexual selection without genetic correlations: social environments and flexible mate choice initiate and enhance the Fisher process.
    Bailey NW; Moore AJ
    Evolution; 2012 Sep; 66(9):2674-84. PubMed ID: 22946795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Digest: Differentiating Fisherian sexual selection dynamics between haploids and diploids.
    Peede D
    Evolution; 2020 Jul; 74(7):1568-1569. PubMed ID: 32441312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Female resistance to sexual coercion can evolve to preserve the indirect benefits of mate choice.
    Snow SS; Alonzo SH; Servedio MR; Prum RO
    J Evol Biol; 2019 Jun; 32(6):545-558. PubMed ID: 30817033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contemporary sexual selection does not explain variation in male display traits among populations.
    Watts JC; Flynn A; Tenhumberg B; Hebets EA
    Evolution; 2019 Sep; 73(9):1927-1940. PubMed ID: 31343745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comprehensive overview of the effects of urbanisation on sexual selection and sexual traits.
    Cronin AD; Smit JAH; Muñoz MI; Poirier A; Moran PA; Jerem P; Halfwerk W
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2022 Aug; 97(4):1325-1345. PubMed ID: 35262266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Unifying quantification methods for sexual selection and assortative mating using information theory.
    Carvajal-Rodríguez A
    Theor Popul Biol; 2024 Aug; 158():206-215. PubMed ID: 38917935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contributions of natural and sexual selection to the evolution of premating reproductive isolation: a research agenda.
    Safran RJ; Scordato ES; Symes LB; Rodríguez RL; Mendelson TC
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2013 Nov; 28(11):643-50. PubMed ID: 24054911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surviving the serenade: how conflicting selection pressures shape the early stages of sexual signal diversification.
    Gallagher JH; Broder ED; Wikle AW; O'Toole H; Durso C; Tinghitella RM
    Evolution; 2024 May; 78(5):835-848. PubMed ID: 38436989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.