These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38667707)

  • 21. A Multilevel Mixture IRT Framework for Modeling Response Times as Predictors or Indicators of Response Engagement in IRT Models.
    Nagy G; Ulitzsch E
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2022 Oct; 82(5):845-879. PubMed ID: 35989730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Measurement precision at the cut score in medical multiple choice exams: Theory matters.
    Lahner FM; Schauber S; Lörwald AC; Kropf R; Guttormsen S; Fischer MR; Huwendiek S
    Perspect Med Educ; 2020 Aug; 9(4):220-228. PubMed ID: 32468274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Modeling Item Revisit Behavior: The Hierarchical Speed-Accuracy-Revisits Model.
    Bezirhan U; von Davier M; Grabovsky I
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2021 Apr; 81(2):363-387. PubMed ID: 37929265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A Bayesian nonparametric approach for handling item and examinee heterogeneity in assessment data.
    Pan T; Shen W; Davis-Stober CP; Hu G
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2024 Feb; 77(1):196-211. PubMed ID: 37727141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Small class sizes for improving student achievement in primary and secondary schools: a systematic review.
    Filges T; Sonne-Schmidt CS; Nielsen BCV
    Campbell Syst Rev; 2018; 14(1):1-107. PubMed ID: 37131395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Retrofitting Diagnostic Classification Models to Responses From IRT-Based Assessment Forms.
    Liu R; Huggins-Manley AC; Bulut O
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2018 Jun; 78(3):357-383. PubMed ID: 30140098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Multidimensional Classification of Examinees Using the Mixture Random Weights Linear Logistic Test Model.
    Choi IH; Wilson M
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2015 Feb; 75(1):78-101. PubMed ID: 29795813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Validity of informant report interpretations: Role of examinee performance and symptom invalidity.
    Webber TA; Sullivan-Baca E; Modiano YA; Taiwo Z; Grabyan JM
    Psychol Assess; 2022 Feb; 34(2):125-138. PubMed ID: 34647761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Using Deterministic, Gated Item Response Theory Model to detect test cheating due to item compromise.
    Shu Z; Henson R; Luecht R
    Psychometrika; 2013 Jul; 78(3):481-97. PubMed ID: 25106396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [The estimation of premorbid intelligence levels in French speakers].
    Mackinnon A; Mulligan R
    Encephale; 2005; 31(1 Pt 1):31-43. PubMed ID: 15971638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Item response theory and the measurement of motor behavior.
    Safrit MJ; Cohen AS; Costa MG
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 1989 Dec; 60(4):325-35. PubMed ID: 2489859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. F-type testlets and the effects of feedback and case-specificity.
    Baldwin P; Baldwin SG; Haist SA
    Acad Med; 2011 Oct; 86(10 Suppl):S55-8; quiz S58. PubMed ID: 21955770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Differences between Scores Assessed by Examiners and Examinees on Objective Structured Clinical Examination.
    Han MH; Park SG
    Korean J Med Educ; 2009 Sep; 21(3):279-85. PubMed ID: 25813316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Item response theory and clinical measurement.
    Reise SP; Waller NG
    Annu Rev Clin Psychol; 2009; 5():27-48. PubMed ID: 18976138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Predicting examinee performance based on a fuzzy cloud cognitive diagnosis framework in e-learning environment.
    Ma H; Huang Z; Zhu H; Tang W; Zhang H; Li K
    Soft comput; 2023 Apr; ():1-21. PubMed ID: 37362284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. State of the psychometric methods: comments on the ISOQOL SIG psychometric papers.
    Bjorner JB
    J Patient Rep Outcomes; 2019 Jul; 3(1):49. PubMed ID: 31359221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Estimation of item parameters and examinees' mastery probability in each domain of the Korean medical licensing examination using deterministic inputs, noisy and gate(DINA) model.
    Choi Y; Seo DG
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2020; 17():35. PubMed ID: 33197992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Exploration of examinees' traits that affect the score of Korean Medical Licensing Examination.
    Yim MK
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2015; 12():5. PubMed ID: 25773516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.