These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38667730)

  • 1. Minimally Invasive and Full Sternotomy Aortic Valve Replacements Lead to Comparable Long-Term Outcomes in Elderly Higher-Risk Patients: A Propensity-Matched Comparison.
    Hlavicka J; Gettwart L; Landgraf J; Salem R; Hecker F; Salihi E; Van Linden A; Walther T; Holubec T
    J Cardiovasc Dev Dis; 2024 Mar; 11(4):. PubMed ID: 38667730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Partial upper sternotomy for aortic valve replacement provides similar mid-term outcomes as the full sternotomy.
    Hlavicka J; Janda D; Budera P; Tousek P; Maly M; Fojt R; Linkova H; Holubec T; Kacer P
    J Thorac Dis; 2022 Apr; 14(4):857-865. PubMed ID: 35572904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Full sternotomy versus right anterior minithoracotomy for isolated aortic valve replacement in octogenarians: a propensity-matched study †.
    Gilmanov D; Farneti PA; Ferrarini M; Santarelli F; Murzi M; Miceli A; Solinas M; Glauber M
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2015 Jun; 20(6):732-41; discussion 741. PubMed ID: 25757476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement versus aortic valve replacement through full sternotomy: the Brigham and Women's Hospital experience.
    Neely RC; Boskovski MT; Gosev I; Kaneko T; McGurk S; Leacche M; Cohn LH
    Ann Cardiothorac Surg; 2015 Jan; 4(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 25694975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Supracommissural replacement of the ascending aorta and the aortic valve via partial versus full sternotomy-a propensity-matched comparison in a high-volume centre.
    Haunschild J; van Kampen A; von Aspern K; Misfeld M; Davierwala P; Saeed D; Borger MA; Etz CD
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2022 Jan; 61(2):479-487. PubMed ID: 34453828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Upper 'J' ministernotomy versus full sternotomy: an easier approach for aortic valve reoperation.
    Mikus E; Calvi S; Tripodi A; Lamarra M; Del Giglio M
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2013 May; 22(3):295-300. PubMed ID: 24151754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Full sternotomy and minimal access approaches for surgical aortic valve replacement: a multicentre propensity-matched study.
    Paparella D; Malvindi PG; Santarpino G; Moscarelli M; Guida P; Fattouch K; Margari V; Martinelli L; Albertini A; Speziale G
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Apr; 57(4):709-716. PubMed ID: 31647535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Benefits of rapid deployment aortic valve replacement with a mini upper sternotomy.
    Chien S; Clark C; Maheshwari S; Koutsogiannidis CP; Zamvar V; Giordano V; Lim K; Pessotto R
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Aug; 15(1):226. PubMed ID: 32847577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Aortic valve replacement through full sternotomy with a stented bioprosthesis versus minimally invasive sternotomy with a sutureless bioprosthesis.
    Dalén M; Biancari F; Rubino AS; Santarpino G; Glaser N; De Praetere H; Kasama K; Juvonen T; Deste W; Pollari F; Meuris B; Fischlein T; Mignosa C; Gatti G; Pappalardo A; Svenarud P; Sartipy U
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Jan; 49(1):220-7. PubMed ID: 25653252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficacy of Aortic Valve Replacement through Full Sternotomy and Minimal Invasion (Ministernotomy).
    Aliahmed HMA; Karalius R; Valaika A; Grebelis A; Semėnienė P; Čypienė R
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2018 Apr; 54(2):. PubMed ID: 30344257
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Review of minimal access versus transcatheter aortic valve replacement for patients with severe aortic stenosis.
    Hoffmann CT; Heiner JA; Nguyen TC
    Ann Cardiothorac Surg; 2017 Sep; 6(5):498-503. PubMed ID: 29062745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minimal invasive aortic valve replacement surgery is associated with improved survival: a propensity-matched comparison.
    Merk DR; Lehmann S; Holzhey DM; Dohmen P; Candolfi P; Misfeld M; Mohr FW; Borger MA
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2015 Jan; 47(1):11-7; discussion 17. PubMed ID: 24599160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimally invasive and conventional aortic valve replacement: a propensity score analysis.
    Gilmanov D; Bevilacqua S; Murzi M; Cerillo AG; Gasbarri T; Kallushi E; Miceli A; Glauber M
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Sep; 96(3):837-43. PubMed ID: 23866805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Propensity score analysis of outcomes following minimal access versus conventional aortic valve replacement.
    Shehada SE; Öztürk Ö; Wottke M; Lange R
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Feb; 49(2):464-9; discussion 469-70. PubMed ID: 25732967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A randomized multicenter trial of minimally invasive rapid deployment versus conventional full sternotomy aortic valve replacement.
    Borger MA; Moustafine V; Conradi L; Knosalla C; Richter M; Merk DR; Doenst T; Hammerschmidt R; Treede H; Dohmen P; Strauch JT
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2015 Jan; 99(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 25441065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mini-sternotomy versus full sternotomy for isolated aortic valve replacement: A single-center experience.
    El-Andari R; White A; Fialka NM; Shan S; Manikala VK; Hong Y; Wang S
    J Card Surg; 2022 Dec; 37(12):4579-4586. PubMed ID: 36378945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Initial clinical experience with minimally invasive surgical aortic valve replacement.
    Abjigitova D; Veen KM; Mokhles MM; Bekkers JA; Oei FB; Bogers AJ
    J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2021 Jun; 62(3):268-277. PubMed ID: 33302611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Propensity matched analysis of minimally invasive versus conventional isolated aortic valve replacement.
    Oo S; Khan A; Chan J; Juneja S; Caputo M; Angelini G; Rajakaruna C; Vohra HA
    Perfusion; 2023 Mar; 38(2):261-269. PubMed ID: 34515578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparative study of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement with sutureless biological versus mechanical prostheses.
    Bociański M; Puślecki M; Olasińska-Wiśniewska A; Perek B; Stefaniak S; Buczkowski P; Jemielity M
    Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol; 2023 Jun; 20(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 37564970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.