173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38668655)
1. Evaluation of large language models in breast cancer clinical scenarios: a comparative analysis based on ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4.0, and Claude2.
Deng L; Wang T; Yangzhang ; Zhai Z; Tao W; Li J; Zhao Y; Luo S; Xu J
Int J Surg; 2024 Apr; 110(4):1941-1950. PubMed ID: 38668655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Learning to Make Rare and Complex Diagnoses With Generative AI Assistance: Qualitative Study of Popular Large Language Models.
Abdullahi T; Singh R; Eickhoff C
JMIR Med Educ; 2024 Feb; 10():e51391. PubMed ID: 38349725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating large language models on a highly-specialized topic, radiation oncology physics.
Holmes J; Liu Z; Zhang L; Ding Y; Sio TT; McGee LA; Ashman JB; Li X; Liu T; Shen J; Liu W
Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1219326. PubMed ID: 37529688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality of Answers of Generative Large Language Models Versus Peer Users for Interpreting Laboratory Test Results for Lay Patients: Evaluation Study.
He Z; Bhasuran B; Jin Q; Tian S; Hanna K; Shavor C; Arguello LG; Murray P; Lu Z
J Med Internet Res; 2024 Apr; 26():e56655. PubMed ID: 38630520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stratified Evaluation of GPT's Question Answering in Surgery Reveals Artificial Intelligence (AI) Knowledge Gaps.
Murphy Lonergan R; Curry J; Dhas K; Simmons BI
Cureus; 2023 Nov; 15(11):e48788. PubMed ID: 38098921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluating Large Language Models for the National Premedical Exam in India: Comparative Analysis of GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and Bard.
Farhat F; Chaudhry BM; Nadeem M; Sohail SS; Madsen DØ
JMIR Med Educ; 2024 Feb; 10():e51523. PubMed ID: 38381486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing the Performance of Popular Large Language Models on the National Board of Medical Examiners Sample Questions.
Abbas A; Rehman MS; Rehman SS
Cureus; 2024 Mar; 16(3):e55991. PubMed ID: 38606229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Large Language Models for Therapy Recommendations Across 3 Clinical Specialties: Comparative Study.
Wilhelm TI; Roos J; Kaczmarczyk R
J Med Internet Res; 2023 Oct; 25():e49324. PubMed ID: 37902826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evidence-based potential of generative artificial intelligence large language models in orthodontics: a comparative study of ChatGPT, Google Bard, and Microsoft Bing.
Makrygiannakis MA; Giannakopoulos K; Kaklamanos EG
Eur J Orthod; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38613510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Enhancing systematic reviews in orthodontics: a comparative examination of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 for generating PICO-based queries with tailored prompts and configurations.
Demir GB; Süküt Y; Duran GS; Topsakal KG; Görgülü S
Eur J Orthod; 2024 Apr; 46(2):. PubMed ID: 38452222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance of ChatGPT, GPT-4, and Google Bard on a Neurosurgery Oral Boards Preparation Question Bank.
Ali R; Tang OY; Connolly ID; Fridley JS; Shin JH; Zadnik Sullivan PL; Cielo D; Oyelese AA; Doberstein CE; Telfeian AE; Gokaslan ZL; Asaad WF
Neurosurgery; 2023 Nov; 93(5):1090-1098. PubMed ID: 37306460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance evaluation of ChatGPT, GPT-4, and Bard on the official board examination of the Japan Radiology Society.
Toyama Y; Harigai A; Abe M; Nagano M; Kawabata M; Seki Y; Takase K
Jpn J Radiol; 2024 Feb; 42(2):201-207. PubMed ID: 37792149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT, Bing, and Medical Students in Germany.
Roos J; Kasapovic A; Jansen T; Kaczmarczyk R
JMIR Med Educ; 2023 Sep; 9():e46482. PubMed ID: 37665620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality of Answers of Generative Large Language Models vs Peer Patients for Interpreting Lab Test Results for Lay Patients: Evaluation Study.
He Z; Bhasuran B; Jin Q; Tian S; Hanna K; Shavor C; Arguello LG; Murray P; Lu Z
ArXiv; 2024 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 38529075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the Performance of Generative AI Large Language Models ChatGPT, Google Bard, and Microsoft Bing Chat in Supporting Evidence-Based Dentistry: Comparative Mixed Methods Study.
Giannakopoulos K; Kavadella A; Aaqel Salim A; Stamatopoulos V; Kaklamanos EG
J Med Internet Res; 2023 Dec; 25():e51580. PubMed ID: 38009003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Comprehensive Survey of ChatGPT: Advancements, Applications, Prospects, and Challenges.
Nazir A; Wang Z
Meta Radiol; 2023 Sep; 1(2):. PubMed ID: 37901715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Application of generative language models to orthopaedic practice.
Caterson J; Ambler O; Cereceda-Monteoliva N; Horner M; Jones A; Poacher AT
BMJ Open; 2024 Mar; 14(3):e076484. PubMed ID: 38485486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Artificial Intelligence for Anesthesiology Board-Style Examination Questions: Role of Large Language Models.
Khan AA; Yunus R; Sohail M; Rehman TA; Saeed S; Bu Y; Jackson CD; Sharkey A; Mahmood F; Matyal R
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2024 May; 38(5):1251-1259. PubMed ID: 38423884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance of ChatGPT and Bard in self-assessment questions for nephrology board renewal.
Noda R; Izaki Y; Kitano F; Komatsu J; Ichikawa D; Shibagaki Y
Clin Exp Nephrol; 2024 May; 28(5):465-469. PubMed ID: 38353783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Large Language Models in Hematology Case Solving: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT-3.5, Google Bard, and Microsoft Bing.
Kumari A; Kumari A; Singh A; Singh SK; Juhi A; Dhanvijay AKD; Pinjar MJ; Mondal H
Cureus; 2023 Aug; 15(8):e43861. PubMed ID: 37736448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
