48 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38668660)
1. Imaging modalities for characterising focal pancreatic lesions.
Best LM; Rawji V; Pereira SP; Davidson BR; Gurusamy KS
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Apr; 4(4):CD010213. PubMed ID: 28415140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasound in pelvic masses with bowel involvement.
She Y; Sun S; Ge N
Int J Surg; 2024 Apr; 110(4):2085-2091. PubMed ID: 38668660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Endoscopic ultrasound evaluation in the surgical treatment of duodenal and peri-ampullary adenomas.
Azih LC; Broussard BL; Phadnis MA; Heslin MJ; Eloubeidi MA; Varadarajulu S; Arnoletti JP
World J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jan; 19(4):511-5. PubMed ID: 23382629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative analysis of ERCP, IDUS, EUS and CT in predicting malignant bile duct strictures.
Heinzow HS; Kammerer S; Rammes C; Wessling J; Domagk D; Meister T
World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Aug; 20(30):10495-503. PubMed ID: 25132767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasonography in pelvic masses with bowel involvement.
She YM; Ge N
Therap Adv Gastroenterol; 2023; 16():17562848231163414. PubMed ID: 37153498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Utility of EUS-guided biopsy of extramural pelvic masses.
Mohamadnejad M; Al-Haddad MA; Sherman S; McHenry L; Leblanc JK; DeWitt J
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jan; 75(1):146-51. PubMed ID: 22018550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A prospective study of Tc-99m MIBI in the differential diagnosis of pelvic masses in female patients.
Tian J; Zhang J; Jiao L; Li Y; Cao L
Clin Nucl Med; 2000 Aug; 25(8):614-8. PubMed ID: 10944017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Objective evaluation of the resistance forces of 22-gauge EUS-FNA and fine-needle biopsy needles.
Matsunami Y; Itoi T; Tsuchiya T; Ishii K; Tanaka R; Tonozuka R; Mukai S; Nagai K; Yamamoto K; Asai Y; Kurosawa T; Kojima H; Minami H; Homma T; Joyama E; Sofuni A
Endosc Ultrasound; 2023; 12(2):251-258. PubMed ID: 37148137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimal sampling technique for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy of solid pancreatic lesions using a 25-gauge ProCore needle: A multicenter randomized crossover superiority study.
Li SY; Shi L; Yao J; Zhou W; Wang ZJ; Jiang YP; Wang XW; Zhou CH; Gao L; Jiang H; Chen Y; Li ZS; Jin ZD; Wang KX
Endosc Ultrasound; 2022; 11(6):466-477. PubMed ID: 36537384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Usefulness of the automated multiband imaging system for EUS-FNA biopsy specimen evaluation in patients with upper gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions.
Okuwaki K; Imaizumi H; Kida M; Masutani H; Iwai T; Watanabe M; Adachi K; Tadehara M; Hasegawa R; Nakatani S; Kurosu T; Tamaki A; Koizumi W
Endosc Ultrasound; 2022; 11(4):283-290. PubMed ID: 35313420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. EUS-guided drainage of the pancreatic duct for the treatment of postoperative stenosis of pancreatico-digestive anastomosis or pancreatic duct stenosis complicating chronic pancreatitis: Experience at a tertiary care center.
Rudler F; Caillol F; Ratone JP; Pesenti C; Valats JC; Soloveyv A; Giovannini M
Endosc Ultrasound; 2022; 11(4):296-305. PubMed ID: 35083983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. STROCSS 2021: Strengthening the reporting of cohort, cross-sectional and case-control studies in surgery.
Mathew G; Agha R; Albrecht J; Goel P; Mukherjee I; Pai P; D'Cruz AK; Nixon IJ; Roberto K; Enam SA; Basu S; Muensterer OJ; Giordano S; Pagano D; Machado-Aranda D; Bradley PJ; Bashashati M; Thoma A; Afifi RY; Johnston M; Challacombe B; Ngu JC; Chalkoo M; Raveendran K; Hoffman JR; Kirshtein B; Lau WY; Thorat MA; Miguel D; Beamish AJ; Roy G; Healy D; Ather HM; Raja SG; Mei Z; Manning TG; Kasivisvanathan V; Rivas JG; Coppola R; Ekser B; Karanth VL; Kadioglu H; Valmasoni M; Noureldin A;
Int J Surg; 2021 Dec; 96():106165. PubMed ID: 34774726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy for gastric submucosal tumors: Does one size fit all?
Cortellini F; Carrara S; Fusaroli P
Endosc Ultrasound; 2022; 11(2):151-152. PubMed ID: 34755708
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimal imaging modality for detection of rectosigmoid deep endometriosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Gerges B; Li W; Leonardi M; Mol BW; Condous G
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Aug; 58(2):190-200. PubMed ID: 33038269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
