BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38668660)

  • 1. Diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasound in pelvic masses with bowel involvement.
    She Y; Sun S; Ge N
    Int J Surg; 2024 Apr; 110(4):2085-2091. PubMed ID: 38668660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Endoscopic ultrasound evaluation in the surgical treatment of duodenal and peri-ampullary adenomas.
    Azih LC; Broussard BL; Phadnis MA; Heslin MJ; Eloubeidi MA; Varadarajulu S; Arnoletti JP
    World J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jan; 19(4):511-5. PubMed ID: 23382629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative analysis of ERCP, IDUS, EUS and CT in predicting malignant bile duct strictures.
    Heinzow HS; Kammerer S; Rammes C; Wessling J; Domagk D; Meister T
    World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Aug; 20(30):10495-503. PubMed ID: 25132767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasonography in pelvic masses with bowel involvement.
    She YM; Ge N
    Therap Adv Gastroenterol; 2023; 16():17562848231163414. PubMed ID: 37153498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Utility of EUS-guided biopsy of extramural pelvic masses.
    Mohamadnejad M; Al-Haddad MA; Sherman S; McHenry L; Leblanc JK; DeWitt J
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jan; 75(1):146-51. PubMed ID: 22018550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A prospective study of Tc-99m MIBI in the differential diagnosis of pelvic masses in female patients.
    Tian J; Zhang J; Jiao L; Li Y; Cao L
    Clin Nucl Med; 2000 Aug; 25(8):614-8. PubMed ID: 10944017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prospective comparison of endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the preoperative assessment of masses in the pancreatic head.
    Glasbrenner B; Schwarz M; Pauls S; Preclik G; Beger HG; Adler G
    Dig Surg; 2000; 17(5):468-74. PubMed ID: 11124550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Imaging modalities for characterising focal pancreatic lesions.
    Best LM; Rawji V; Pereira SP; Davidson BR; Gurusamy KS
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Apr; 4(4):CD010213. PubMed ID: 28415140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Prospective Study on Contrast-Enhanced Endoscopic Ultrasound for Differential Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasms.
    Zhong L; Chai N; Linghu E; Li H; Yang J; Tang P
    Dig Dis Sci; 2019 Dec; 64(12):3616-3622. PubMed ID: 31290040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The utility of lower endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for the diagnosis of benign and malignant pelvic diseases.
    Rzouq F; Brown J; Fan F; Oropeza-Vail M; Sidorenko E; Gilroy R; Esfandyari T; Bonino J; Olyaee M
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2014 Feb; 48(2):127-30. PubMed ID: 23751849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transrectal endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy for qualitative diagnosis of pelvic space-occupying lesions: a diagnostic test.
    Cai W; Cheng G; Tao F; Hu D; Wu W
    Transl Cancer Res; 2022 Sep; 11(9):3267-3276. PubMed ID: 36237230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Combined Application of Ultrasound and CT Increased Diagnostic Value in Female Patients with Pelvic Masses.
    Liu Y; Zhang H; Li X; Qi G
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2016; 2016():6146901. PubMed ID: 27867419
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Retrospective analysis of the utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in pancreatic masses, using a 22-gauge or 25-gauge needle system: a multicenter experience.
    Yusuf TE; Ho S; Pavey DA; Michael H; Gress FG
    Endoscopy; 2009 May; 41(5):445-8. PubMed ID: 19418399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Comparison of magnetic resonance (0,5 T), computed tomography, and endorectal ultrasonography in the preoperative staging of neoplasms of the rectum-sigma. Correlation with surgical and anatomopathologic findings].
    Golfieri R; Giampalma E; Leo P; Colecchia A; Selleri S; Poggioli G; Gandolfi L; Gozzetti G; Trebbi F; Russo A
    Radiol Med; 1993 Jun; 85(6):773-83. PubMed ID: 8337435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Preoperative locoregional staging of gastric cancer: is there a place for magnetic resonance imaging? Prospective comparison with EUS and multidetector computed tomography.
    Giganti F; Orsenigo E; Arcidiacono PG; Nicoletti R; Albarello L; Ambrosi A; Salerno A; Esposito A; Petrone MC; Chiari D; Staudacher C; Del Maschio A; De Cobelli F
    Gastric Cancer; 2016 Jan; 19(1):216-25. PubMed ID: 25614468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A prospective analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of 3 T MRI, CT and endoscopic ultrasound for preoperative T staging of potentially resectable esophageal cancer.
    Guo J; Wang Z; Qin J; Zhang H; Liu W; Zhao Y; Lu Y; Yan X; Zhang Z; Zhang T; Zhang S; Dominik NM; Kamel IR; Li H; Qu J
    Cancer Imaging; 2020 Sep; 20(1):64. PubMed ID: 32912319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The use of EUS to diagnose malignant portal venous system invasion by pancreatic cancer.
    Brugge WR; Lee MJ; Kelsey PB; Schapiro RH; Warshaw AL
    Gastrointest Endosc; 1996 Jun; 43(6):561-7. PubMed ID: 8781933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Role of repeated endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in small solid pancreatic masses with previous indeterminate and negative cytological findings.
    Tadic M; Kujundzic M; Stoos-Veic T; Kaic G; Vukelic-Markovic M
    Dig Dis; 2008; 26(4):377-82. PubMed ID: 19188731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Endoscopic ultrasound and fine needle aspiration for the evaluation of pancreatic masses.
    Suits J; Frazee R; Erickson RA
    Arch Surg; 1999 Jun; 134(6):639-42; discussion 642-3. PubMed ID: 10367874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A prospective comparison of endorectal ultrasound and pelvic magnetic resonance in the preoperative staging of rectal cancer.
    Bianchi P; Ceriani C; Palmisano A; Pompili G; Passoni GR; Rottoli M; Cappellani A; Montorsi M
    Ann Ital Chir; 2006; 77(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 16910358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.