These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38669)

  • 1. The influence of scalp sampling on the cesarean section rate for fetal distress.
    Zalar RW; Quilligan EJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Sep; 135(2):239-46. PubMed ID: 38669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of fetal scalp blood pH on the incidence of cesarean section performed for fetal distress.
    Ayromlooi J; Garfinkel R
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1980; 17(4):391-2. PubMed ID: 6102066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fetal heart rate patterns and scalp blood pH as predictors of fetal distress.
    Katz M; Meizner I; Mazor M; Insler V
    Isr J Med Sci; 1981 Apr; 17(4):260-5. PubMed ID: 7239872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intrapartum fetal surveillance: the role of fetal scalp blood sampling.
    Clark SL; Paul RH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Dec; 153(7):717-20. PubMed ID: 4073132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring in low-risk pregnancies.
    Westgren M; Ingemarsson E; Ingemarsson I; Solum T
    Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Sep; 56(3):301-4. PubMed ID: 7422168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fetal monitoring: its effect on the perinatal mortality and cesarean section rates and its complications.
    Tutera G; Newman RL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1975 Jul; 122(6):750-4. PubMed ID: 1155516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. FHR tracing characteristics that jeopardize the diagnosis of fetal well-being.
    Quirk JG; Miller FC
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Mar; 29(1):12-22. PubMed ID: 3955926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Foetal scalp blood sampling: impact on the incidence of Caesarean section and assisted vaginal deliveries for non-reassuring foetal heart rate and its use according to gestational age].
    Reif P; Haas J; Schöll W; Lang U
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2011 Oct; 215(5):194-8. PubMed ID: 22028059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perinatal observations in a high-risk population managed without intrapartum fetal pH studies.
    Perkins RP
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Jun; 149(3):327-36. PubMed ID: 6731510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Elimination of fetal scalp blood sampling on a large clinical service.
    Goodwin TM; Milner-Masterson L; Paul RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jun; 83(6):971-4. PubMed ID: 8190443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of electronic fetal heart rate monitoring on perinatal outcome and obstetric practices.
    Mueller-Heubach E; MacDonald HM; Joret D; Portman MA; Edelstone DI; Caritis SN
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Aug; 137(7):758-63. PubMed ID: 7405966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fetal stress and nonstress tests: an analysis and comparison of their ability to identify fetal outcome.
    Pratt D; Diamond F; Yen H; Bieniarz J; Burd L
    Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Oct; 54(4):419-23. PubMed ID: 492619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Combined monitoring of labor: maternal and neonatal results].
    Goeschen K
    Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol; 1992; 196(3):103-5. PubMed ID: 1496843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fetal distress and the condition of newborn infants.
    Sykes GS; Molloy PM; Johnson P; Stirrat GM; Turnbull AC
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1983 Oct; 287(6397):943-5. PubMed ID: 6412897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The importance of the learning process in ST analysis interpretation and its impact in improving clinical and neonatal outcomes.
    Timonen S; Holmberg K
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 218(6):620.e1-620.e7. PubMed ID: 29577914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of availability of fetal ECG monitoring on operative deliveries.
    Kale A; Chong YS; Biswas A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(11):1189-93. PubMed ID: 19016356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The evaluation of continuous fetal heart rate monitoring in high-risk pregnancy.
    Haverkamp AD; Thompson HE; McFee JG; Cetrulo C
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1976 Jun; 125(3):310-20. PubMed ID: 5895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Further experience with the fetal biophysical profile.
    Platt LD; Eglinton GS; Sipos L; Broussard PM; Paul RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Apr; 61(4):480-5. PubMed ID: 6681892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effectiveness of pulse oximetry versus fetal electrocardiography for the intrapartum evaluation of nonreassuring fetal heart rate.
    Valverde M; Puertas AM; Lopez-Gallego MF; Carrillo MP; Aguilar MT; Montoya F
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Dec; 159(2):333-7. PubMed ID: 21978943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ten-year experience of intrapartum fetal monitoring in Los Angeles County/University of Southern California Medical Center.
    Yeh SY; Diaz F; Paul RH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Jul; 143(5):496-500. PubMed ID: 7091219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.