These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38671489)

  • 21. Resource allocation in NHS dentistry: recognition of societal preferences (RAINDROP): study protocol.
    Vernazza CR; Carr K; Wildman J; Gray J; Holmes RD; Exley C; Smith RA; Donaldson C
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Jun; 18(1):487. PubMed ID: 29929516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Stakeholder views on criteria and processes for priority setting in Norway: a qualitative study.
    Aidem JM
    Health Policy; 2017 Jun; 121(6):683-690. PubMed ID: 28433324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Priority setting in developing countries health care institutions: the case of a Ugandan hospital.
    Kapiriri L; Martin DK
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2006 Oct; 6():127. PubMed ID: 17026761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Improving community support for older people's needs through commissioning third sector services: a qualitative study.
    Chadborn N; Craig C; Sands G; Schneider J; Gladman J
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2019 Apr; 24(2):116-123. PubMed ID: 30971192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Priority setting and the ethics of resource allocation within VA healthcare facilities: results of a survey.
    Foglia MB; Pearlman RA; Bottrell MM; Altemose JA; Fox E
    Organ Ethic; 2008; 4(2):83-96. PubMed ID: 18839751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Becoming an enabler of everyday activity: Health professionals in home care services experiences of working with reablement.
    Liaaen J; Vik K
    Int J Older People Nurs; 2019 Dec; 14(4):e12270. PubMed ID: 31486594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. 'It's where I belong': what does it mean to age in place from the perspective of people aged 80 and above? A longitudinal qualitative study (wave one).
    Gibson K; Brittain K; McLellan E; Kingston A; Wilkinson H; Robinson L
    BMC Geriatr; 2024 Jun; 24(1):524. PubMed ID: 38886645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Priority setting for maternal, newborn and child health in Uganda: a qualitative study evaluating actual practice.
    Wallace LJ; Kapiriri L
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2019 Jul; 19(1):465. PubMed ID: 31286950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Acceptable health and priority weighting: Discussing a reference-level approach using sufficientarian reasoning.
    Wouters S; van Exel NJA; Rohde KIM; Vromen JJ; Brouwer WBF
    Soc Sci Med; 2017 May; 181():158-167. PubMed ID: 28402905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Allocating health care resources: a questionnaire experiment on the predictive success of rules.
    Ahlert M; Schwettmann L
    Int J Equity Health; 2017 Jun; 16(1):112. PubMed ID: 28651546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A multicriteria resource allocation model for the redesign of services following birth.
    Bowers J; Cheyne H; Mould G; Miller M; Page M; Harris F; Bick D
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Aug; 18(1):656. PubMed ID: 30134882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. To accept, or not to accept, that is the question: citizen reactions to rationing.
    Broqvist M; Garpenby P
    Health Expect; 2014 Feb; 17(1):82-92. PubMed ID: 22032636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. How to Fairly Allocate Scarce Medical Resources: Ethical Argumentation under Scrutiny by Health Professionals and Lay People.
    Krütli P; Rosemann T; Törnblom KY; Smieszek T
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0159086. PubMed ID: 27462880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The Norwegian National Council for Priority Setting in Health Care: decisions and justifications.
    Wester G; Bringedal B
    Health Econ Policy Law; 2018 Apr; 13(2):118-136. PubMed ID: 28322184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Active aging needs from the perspectives of older adults and geriatric experts: a qualitative study.
    Ayoubi-Mahani S; Eghbali-Babadi M; Farajzadegan Z; Keshvari M; Farokhzadian J
    Front Public Health; 2023; 11():1121761. PubMed ID: 37397742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Priority setting: a sensible approach to Medicaid policy?
    Grannemann TW
    Inquiry; 1991; 28(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 1833340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Assessing and Improving Performance: A Longitudinal Evaluation of Priority Setting and Resource Allocation in a Canadian Health Region.
    Hall W; Smith N; Mitton C; Urquhart B; Bryan S
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2018 Apr; 7(4):328-335. PubMed ID: 29626400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Political strategies in difficult times - The "backstage" experience of Swedish politicians on formal priority setting in healthcare.
    Garpenby P; Nedlund AC
    Soc Sci Med; 2016 Aug; 163():63-70. PubMed ID: 27404909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Factors influencing care and support for older adults with traumatic injury in Australia: a qualitative study.
    Schwarzman J; Lalor A; Reeder S; Callaway L; Aburumman M; Gabbe BJ; Ekegren CL
    Disabil Rehabil; 2022 Nov; 44(22):6692-6698. PubMed ID: 34493139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Tools of the trade: a comparative analysis of approaches to priority setting in healthcare.
    Mitton C; Donaldson C
    Health Serv Manage Res; 2003 May; 16(2):96-105. PubMed ID: 12803949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.