These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38674388)
1. Marker Density and Models to Improve the Accuracy of Genomic Selection for Growth and Slaughter Traits in Meat Rabbits. Li W; Li W; Song Z; Gao Z; Xie K; Wang Y; Wang B; Hu J; Zhang Q; Ning C; Wang D; Fan X Genes (Basel); 2024 Apr; 15(4):. PubMed ID: 38674388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of genomic selection for a sib-evaluated trait using identity-by-state and identity-by-descent relationships. Vela-Avitúa S; Meuwissen TH; Luan T; Ødegård J Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):9. PubMed ID: 25888184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Marker density and statistical model designs to increase accuracy of genomic selection for wool traits in Angora rabbits. Ning C; Xie K; Huang J; Di Y; Wang Y; Yang A; Hu J; Zhang Q; Wang D; Fan X Front Genet; 2022; 13():968712. PubMed ID: 36118881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Genomic predictions can accelerate selection for resistance against Piscirickettsia salmonis in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Bangera R; Correa K; Lhorente JP; Figueroa R; Yáñez JM BMC Genomics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):121. PubMed ID: 28143402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of marker density and population structure on the genomic prediction accuracy for growth trait in Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei. Wang Q; Yu Y; Yuan J; Zhang X; Huang H; Li F; Xiang J BMC Genet; 2017 May; 18(1):45. PubMed ID: 28514941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Opportunities for genomic selection in American mink: A simulation study. Karimi K; Sargolzaei M; Plastow GS; Wang Z; Miar Y PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0213873. PubMed ID: 30870528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An efficient unified model for genome-wide association studies and genomic selection. Li H; Su G; Jiang L; Bao Z Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Aug; 49(1):64. PubMed ID: 28836943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accounting for trait architecture in genomic predictions of US Holstein cattle using a weighted realized relationship matrix. Tiezzi F; Maltecca C Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Apr; 47(1):24. PubMed ID: 25886167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. On the use of whole-genome sequence data for across-breed genomic prediction and fine-scale mapping of QTL. Meuwissen T; van den Berg I; Goddard M Genet Sel Evol; 2021 Feb; 53(1):19. PubMed ID: 33637049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Economic evaluation of genomic selection in small ruminants: a sheep meat breeding program. Shumbusho F; Raoul J; Astruc JM; Palhiere I; Lemarié S; Fugeray-Scarbel A; Elsen JM Animal; 2016 Jun; 10(6):1033-41. PubMed ID: 26446712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of genomic selection methods for predicting fiber quality traits in Upland cotton. Islam MS; Fang DD; Jenkins JN; Guo J; McCarty JC; Jones DC Mol Genet Genomics; 2020 Jan; 295(1):67-79. PubMed ID: 31473809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of pedigree and genomic predictions of carcass and novel meat quality traits in multi-breed sheep data assessed by cross-validation. Daetwyler HD; Swan AA; van der Werf JH; Hayes BJ Genet Sel Evol; 2012 Nov; 44(1):33. PubMed ID: 23146144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of prediction of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake and carcass and meat quality traits in Bos taurus, Bos indicus, and composite beef cattle. Bolormaa S; Pryce JE; Kemper K; Savin K; Hayes BJ; Barendse W; Zhang Y; Reich CM; Mason BA; Bunch RJ; Harrison BE; Reverter A; Herd RM; Tier B; Graser HU; Goddard ME J Anim Sci; 2013 Jul; 91(7):3088-104. PubMed ID: 23658330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Genomic selection models substantially improve the accuracy of genetic merit predictions for fillet yield and body weight in rainbow trout using a multi-trait model and multi-generation progeny testing. Garcia A; Tsuruta S; Gao G; Palti Y; Lourenco D; Leeds T Genet Sel Evol; 2023 Feb; 55(1):11. PubMed ID: 36759760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prediction Accuracies of Genomic Selection for Nine Commercially Important Traits in the Portuguese Oyster ( Vu SV; Gondro C; Nguyen NTH; Gilmour AR; Tearle R; Knibb W; Dove M; Vu IV; Khuong LD; O'Connor W Genes (Basel); 2021 Feb; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 33535381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Genome-enabled prediction of meat and carcass traits using Bayesian regression, single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction and blending methods in Nelore cattle. Lopes FB; Baldi F; Passafaro TL; Brunes LC; Costa MFO; Eifert EC; Narciso MG; Rosa GJM; Lobo RB; Magnabosco CU Animal; 2021 Jan; 15(1):100006. PubMed ID: 33516009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Genomic selection in a pig population including information from slaughtered full sibs of boars within a sib-testing program. Samorè AB; Buttazzoni L; Gallo M; Russo V; Fontanesi L Animal; 2015 May; 9(5):750-9. PubMed ID: 25510405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of GBLUP, BayesB and elastic net for genomic prediction in Chinese Simmental beef cattle. Wang X; Miao J; Chang T; Xia J; An B; Li Y; Xu L; Zhang L; Gao X; Li J; Gao H PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0210442. PubMed ID: 30817758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Single-Step Genomic Evaluation for Meat Quality Traits, Sensory Characteristics, and Fatty-Acid Composition in Duroc Pigs. Lopez BI; Santiago KG; Lee D; Cho Y; Lim D; Seo K Genes (Basel); 2020 Sep; 11(9):. PubMed ID: 32916909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]