These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3867694)

  • 1. A new technique for screening chemical toxicity to the pulp from dental restorative materials and procedures.
    Hume WR
    J Dent Res; 1985 Nov; 64(11):1322-5. PubMed ID: 3867694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Penetration of the pulp chamber by bleaching agents in teeth restored with various restorative materials.
    Gökay O; Yilmaz F; Akin S; Tunçbìlek M; Ertan R
    J Endod; 2000 Feb; 26(2):92-4. PubMed ID: 11194380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Primate pulpal response to ultraviolet light-polymerized direct-bonding material systems.
    Myers CL; Stanley HR; Heyde JB; Chamberlain J
    J Dent Res; 1976; 55(6):1118-24. PubMed ID: 826551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Dental pulp reactions and pulp protection: traditional underlayers versus dentin adhesive lacquer].
    Van Meerbeek B; Perdigão J; Inokoshi S; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1996 Nov; 103(11):439-43. PubMed ID: 11921986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Incomplete caries removal in deep lesions: a 10-year prospective study.
    Maltz M; Alves LS; Jardim JJ; Moura Mdos S; de Oliveira EF
    Am J Dent; 2011 Aug; 24(4):211-4. PubMed ID: 22016914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Two-year clinical study on postoperative pulpal complications arising from the absence of a glass-ionomer lining in deep occlusal resin-composite restorations.
    Banomyong D; Messer H
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2013 Nov; 4(4):265-70. PubMed ID: 23355492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Endodontic complications after plastic restorations in general practice.
    Whitworth JM; Myers PM; Smith J; Walls AW; McCabe JF
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):409-16. PubMed ID: 15910477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pulp-dentin biology in restorative dentistry. Part 6: Reactions to restorative materials, tooth-restoration interfaces, and adhesive techniques.
    Mjör IA; Ferrari M
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Jan; 33(1):35-63. PubMed ID: 11887534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interactions between cavity preparation and restoration events and their effects on pulp vitality.
    Wisithphrom K; Murray PE; About I; Windsor LJ
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Dec; 26(6):596-605. PubMed ID: 17243333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biocompatibility of a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement applied as pulp capping in human teeth.
    do Nascimento AB; Fontana UF; Teixeira HM; Costa CA
    Am J Dent; 2000 Feb; 13(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 11763899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biocomposition and reaction of pulp tissues to restorative treatments.
    Cox CF; Hafez AA
    Dent Clin North Am; 2001 Jan; 45(1):31-48; v. PubMed ID: 11210698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pulpal response to a new light-cured composite placed in etched glass-ionomer lined cavities.
    Hosoda H; Inokoshi S; Shimada Y; Harnirattisai C; Otsuki M
    Oper Dent; 1991; 16(4):122-9. PubMed ID: 1805180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Identification of hierarchical factors to guide clinical decision making for successful long-term pulp capping.
    Murray PE; Hafez AA; Smith AJ; Cox CF
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 12674361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pulpal response to a new adhesive restorative resin.
    Inokoshi S; Iwaku M; Fusayama T
    J Dent Res; 1982 Aug; 61(8):1014-9. PubMed ID: 6955336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biologic considerations in the selection and use of restorative materials.
    Massler M
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1968 Mar; 23(3):58-69. PubMed ID: 5239659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pulpal response to four restorative materials.
    Bhaskar SN; Cutright DE; Beasley JD; Boyers RC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1969 Jul; 28(1):126-33. PubMed ID: 5255358
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Direct pulp capping with a self-etching adhesive system: histopathologic evaluation in dogs' teeth.
    da Silva LA; de Freitas AC; de Carvalho FK; de Queiroz AM; Nelson-Filho P; Porto-Neto ST
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jul; 108(1):e34-40. PubMed ID: 19540442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pulpal and periapical response after restoration of deep cavities in dogs' teeth with Filtek Silorane and Filtek Supreme XT systems.
    Ruiz-de-Castañeda E; Gatón-Hernández P; Rodriguez EG; Silva RA; Nelson-Filho P; Silva LA
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 22770433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pulpal effects of various restorations.
    Solomon C
    Ann Dent; 1998 Oct; 2(1):3, 6, 20. PubMed ID: 11305064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biological testing of dental restorative materials in vitro--a review.
    Browne RM; Tyas MJ
    J Oral Rehabil; 1979 Oct; 6(4):365-74. PubMed ID: 291706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.