These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38677298)
1. Short-term Comparison of Survivorship and Functional Outcomes for Metaphyseal Cones with Short and Long Stems in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. Piuzzi NS; Hampp EL; Shi S; Bhowmik-Stoker M; Huffman N; Denehy KM; Markel DC; Li DD; Mont MA J Knee Surg; 2024 Sep; 37(11):765-772. PubMed ID: 38677298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Short-term Outcomes of 3D-Printed Titanium Metaphyseal Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. Remily EA; Dávila Castrodad IM; Mohamed NS; Wilkie WA; Kelemen MN; Delanois RE Orthopedics; 2021 Jan; 44(1):43-47. PubMed ID: 33284980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Survivorship and Radiographic Evaluation of Metaphyseal Cones With Short Cemented Stems in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. Behery OA; Shing EZ; Yu Z; Springer BD; Fehring TK; Otero JE J Arthroplasty; 2022 Feb; 37(2):330-335. PubMed ID: 34742873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Excellent two-year survivorship of 3D-printed metaphyseal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty. Tetreault MW; Perry KI; Pagnano MW; Hanssen AD; Abdel MP Bone Joint J; 2020 Jun; 102-B(6_Supple_A):107-115. PubMed ID: 32475272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Porous Tantalum Metaphyseal Cones for Severe Femoral and Tibial Bone Defects in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty are Reliable for Fixation at Mean 5-Year Follow-Up. Kayani B; Howard LC; Neufeld ME; Greidanus NV; Masri BA; Garbuz DS J Arthroplasty; 2024 Sep; 39(9S2):S374-S379. PubMed ID: 38508344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Two-Year Survivorship and Outcomes of a Three-Dimensional Printed Metaphyseal Cone in the Setting of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. Monárrez R; Bains SS; Chen Z; Sax OC; Salib CG; Mont MA; Delanois RE J Knee Surg; 2022 Dec; 35(14):1540-1543. PubMed ID: 36538941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. 3D-printed titanium metaphyseal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty with cemented and cementless stems. Anderson LA; Christie M; Blackburn BE; Mahan C; Earl C; Pelt CE; Peters CL; Gililland J Bone Joint J; 2021 Jun; 103-B(6 Supple A):150-157. PubMed ID: 34053297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Metaphyseal Fixation Using Highly Porous Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Minimum Two Year Follow Up Study. Denehy KM; Abhari S; Krebs VE; Higuera-Rueda CA; Samuel LT; Sultan AA; Mont MA; Malkani AL J Arthroplasty; 2019 Oct; 34(10):2439-2443. PubMed ID: 31000405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimum 5-Year Clinical Outcomes and Survivorship for a Single Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty System Using Hybrid Fixation and Press-Fit Stems. Lim JBT; Somerville L; Vasarhelyi EM; Howard JL; Naudie DDR; McCalden RW J Arthroplasty; 2023 Jun; 38(6S):S297-S301. PubMed ID: 37003457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Metaphyseal Fixation Using Cones and Sleeves for Severe Proximal Tibial Bone Loss. Zitsch BP; Salaymeh JK; Burdyny MR; Buckner BC; Lyden ER; Konigsberg BS; Garvin KL; Hartman CW J Arthroplasty; 2024 Aug; 39(8S1):S256-S262. PubMed ID: 38604279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Novel 3D-printed Stepped Porous Metal Cones and Metaphyseal Sleeves for Reconstruction of Severe Knee Bone Defects: Short-term Clinical Outcomes. Liu Y; Shen J; Tang Y; Zhang Y; Ma H; Zhou Y Orthop Surg; 2024 Jul; 16(7):1657-1664. PubMed ID: 38790115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Excellent mid- to long-term survival of tantalum metal cones in a case series of revision knee arthroplasty with severe bony defects. Eder-Halbedl M; Fink A; Pietsch M; Djahani O; Hofmann S Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2023 Dec; 31(12):5496-5506. PubMed ID: 37819600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 3D-Printed Metaphyseal Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasties: Excellent Survivorship of 740 Cones at 5 Years. Carender CN; Bothun CE; Taunton MJ; Perry KI; Bedard NA; Pagnano MW; Abdel MP J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2024 Sep; 106(18):1688-1696. PubMed ID: 38875316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Do Porous Tantalum Metaphyseal Cones Improve Outcomes in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty? Bohl DD; Brown NM; McDowell MA; Levine BR; Sporer SM; Paprosky WG; Della Valle CJ J Arthroplasty; 2018 Jan; 33(1):171-177. PubMed ID: 28844630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Varus-valgus constraint in 416 revision total knee arthroplasties with cemented stems provides a reliable reconstruction with a low subsequent revision rate at early to mid-term review. Limberg AK; Tibbo ME; Pagnano MW; Perry KI; Hanssen AD; Abdel MP Bone Joint J; 2020 Apr; 102-B(4):458-462. PubMed ID: 32228079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Survivorship of Metaphyseal Cones and Sleeves in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. Heidenreich MJ; Lanting BA; McCalden RW; Naudie DD; Howard JL; MacDonald SJ; Vasarhelyi EM J Arthroplasty; 2022 Jun; 37(6S):S263-S269. PubMed ID: 35257822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intermediate-Term Survivorship of Metaphyseal Cones and Sleeves in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. Small I; Meghpara M; Stein J; Goh GS; Banerjee S; Courtney PM J Arthroplasty; 2022 Sep; 37(9):1839-1843. PubMed ID: 35398228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Do Metaphyseal Cones and Stems Provide Any Biomechanical Advantage for Moderate Contained Tibial Defects in Revision TKA? A Finite-Element Analysis Based on a Cadaver Model. Quevedo González FJ; Meyers KN; Schraut N; Mehrotra KG; Lipman JD; Wright TM; Ast MP Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Nov; 479(11):2534-2546. PubMed ID: 34351312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]