129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38677340)
1. Porous Tantalum Tibial Metaphyseal Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Excellent 10-Year Survivorship.
Hadley ML; Harmer JR; Wright BH; Larson DR; Abdel MP; Berry DJ; Lewallen DG
J Arthroplasty; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38677340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Excellent mid- to long-term survival of tantalum metal cones in a case series of revision knee arthroplasty with severe bony defects.
Eder-Halbedl M; Fink A; Pietsch M; Djahani O; Hofmann S
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2023 Dec; 31(12):5496-5506. PubMed ID: 37819600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Porous Tantalum Metaphyseal Cones for Severe Femoral and Tibial Bone Defects in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty are Reliable for Fixation at Mean 5-Year Follow-Up.
Kayani B; Howard LC; Neufeld ME; Greidanus NV; Masri BA; Garbuz DS
J Arthroplasty; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38508344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty: a five to nine-year follow-up.
Kamath AF; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Feb; 97(3):216-23. PubMed ID: 25653322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Metaphyseal Fixation Using Highly Porous Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Minimum Two Year Follow Up Study.
Denehy KM; Abhari S; Krebs VE; Higuera-Rueda CA; Samuel LT; Sultan AA; Mont MA; Malkani AL
J Arthroplasty; 2019 Oct; 34(10):2439-2443. PubMed ID: 31000405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tantalum Cones for Severe Bone Defects in Revision Knee Arthroplasty: A Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up.
De Martino I; Mancino F; Di Matteo V; Singlitico A; Maccauro G; Gasparini G
J Arthroplasty; 2023 May; 38(5):886-892. PubMed ID: 36481282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Excellent two-year survivorship of 3D-printed metaphyseal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty.
Tetreault MW; Perry KI; Pagnano MW; Hanssen AD; Abdel MP
Bone Joint J; 2020 Jun; 102-B(6_Supple_A):107-115. PubMed ID: 32475272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Midterm Results of Porous Tantalum Femoral Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Potter GD; Abdel MP; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Aug; 98(15):1286-91. PubMed ID: 27489319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. High survival rate at mid-term follow up of porous tantalum cones for bone defects in revision total knee replacement: A 3-11 years follow up report.
Rossi SMP; Perticarini L; Ghiara M; Jannelli E; Cortesi L; Benazzo F
Knee; 2022 Mar; 35():175-182. PubMed ID: 35349974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mid term outcomes of a novel metaphyseal porous titanium cone in revision total knee arthroplasty.
Shichman I; Anil U; van Hellemondt G; Gupta S; Willems J; Deshmukh AJ; Rodriguez JA; Lutes WB; Schwarzkopf R
J Clin Orthop Trauma; 2023 Nov; 46():102282. PubMed ID: 38196965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 3D-Printed Metaphyseal Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasties: Excellent Survivorship of 740 Cones at 5 Years.
Carender CN; Bothun CE; Taunton MJ; Perry KI; Bedard NA; Pagnano MW; Abdel MP
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38875316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical Survivorship of Aseptic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Hinged Knees and Tantalum Cones at Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up.
Abdelaziz H; Jaramillo R; Gehrke T; Ohlmeier M; Citak M
J Arthroplasty; 2019 Dec; 34(12):3018-3022. PubMed ID: 31351856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mid-term results of tibial cones : reasonable survivorship but increased failure in those with significant bone loss and prior infection.
Hernandez NM; Hinton ZW; Wu CJ; Ryan SP; Bolognesi MP
Bone Joint J; 2021 Jun; 103-B(6 Supple A):158-164. PubMed ID: 34053275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Early Survivorship of Newly Designed Highly Porous Metaphyseal Tibial Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Chalmers BP; Malfer CM; Mayman DJ; Westrich GH; Sculco PK; Bostrom MP; Jerabek SA
Arthroplast Today; 2021 Apr; 8():5-10. PubMed ID: 33665275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiographic and clinical analysis of a Porous-coated metaphyseal cone for revision total Knee arthroplasty.
Guntin J; Bartosiak KA; Della Valle CJ; Patel A; Gerlinger TL; Nam D
Knee; 2022 Aug; 37():162-170. PubMed ID: 35803170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tantalum Cones Provide Durable Mid-term Fixation in Revision TKA.
De Martino I; De Santis V; Sculco PK; D'Apolito R; Assini JB; Gasparini G
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Oct; 473(10):3176-82. PubMed ID: 25968895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Uncemented Tantalum Monoblock Tibial Fixation for Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients Less Than 60 Years of Age: Mean 10-Year Follow-up.
DeFrancesco CJ; Canseco JA; Nelson CL; Israelite CL; Kamath AF
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2018 May; 100(10):865-870. PubMed ID: 29762282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Can tantalum cones provide fixation in complex revision knee arthroplasty?
Lachiewicz PF; Bolognesi MP; Henderson RA; Soileau ES; Vail TP
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2012 Jan; 470(1):199-204. PubMed ID: 21465329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Do Porous Tantalum Metaphyseal Cones Improve Outcomes in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty?
Bohl DD; Brown NM; McDowell MA; Levine BR; Sporer SM; Paprosky WG; Della Valle CJ
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Jan; 33(1):171-177. PubMed ID: 28844630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Survivorship of Metaphyseal Sleeves in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Chalmers BP; Desy NM; Pagnano MW; Trousdale RT; Taunton MJ
J Arthroplasty; 2017 May; 32(5):1565-1570. PubMed ID: 28109761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
