These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38679136)
1. Reliability of a face scanner in measuring the vertical dimension of occlusion. Srinivasan M; Berisha F; Bronzino I; Kamnoedboon P; Leles CR J Dent; 2024 Jul; 146():105016. PubMed ID: 38679136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison study of different facial soft tissue analysis methods. Kook MS; Jung S; Park HJ; Oh HK; Ryu SY; Cho JH; Lee JS; Yoon SJ; Kim MS; Shin HK J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):648-56. PubMed ID: 24954528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Chairside virtual patient protocol. Part 1: Free vs Guided face scan protocol. Raffone C; Gianfreda F; Bollero P; Pompeo MG; Miele G; Canullo L J Dent; 2022 Jan; 116():103881. PubMed ID: 34762986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-dimensional evaluation of the relationship between jaw divergence and facial soft tissue dimensions. Rongo R; Antoun JS; Lim YX; Dias G; Valletta R; Farella M Angle Orthod; 2014 Sep; 84(5):788-94. PubMed ID: 24559507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Orthodontic soft-tissue parameters: a comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and the 3dMD imaging system. Metzger TE; Kula KS; Eckert GJ; Ghoneima AA Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Nov; 144(5):672-81. PubMed ID: 24182583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reproducibility of facial soft tissue landmarks on facial images captured on a 3D camera. Othman SA; Ahmad R; Mericant AF; Jamaludin M Aust Orthod J; 2013 May; 29(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 23785939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The facial effects of tooth wear rehabilitation as measured by 3D stereophotogrammetry. Sterenborg BAMM; Maal TJJ; Vreeken R; Loomans BAC; Huysmans MDNJM J Dent; 2018 Jun; 73():105-109. PubMed ID: 29689294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Distances between facial landmarks can be measured accurately with a new digital 3-dimensional video system. Schimmel M; Christou P; Houstis O; Herrmann FR; Kiliaridis S; Müller F Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):580.e1-580.e10; discussion 580-1. PubMed ID: 20451768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Soft and hard tissue changes of hyperdivergent class Ⅱ patients before and after orthodontic extraction treatment]. Mao B; Tian Y; Wang X; Li J; Zhou Y Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2024 Feb; 56(1):111-119. PubMed ID: 38318905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of various anthropometric measurements for the determination of the occlusal vertical dimension. Kaffaf MB; Şakar O J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Sep; 132(3):570-577. PubMed ID: 39112346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Frontal soft tissue analysis using a 3 dimensional camera following two-jaw rotational orthognathic surgery in skeletal class III patients. Choi JW; Lee JY; Oh TS; Kwon SM; Yang SJ; Koh KS J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 42(3):220-6. PubMed ID: 23870714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of Dolphin Imaging software in predicting soft tissue changes of Class II Division 1 incisor relationship treated by all first premolar extraction compared with post-treatment lateral cephalogram. Maniyar N; Prakash AT; Kumar HCK; Yavagal PC J World Fed Orthod; 2024 Jun; 13(3):128-135. PubMed ID: 38503646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A three-dimensional evaluation of Māori and New Zealand European faces. Antoun JS; Lawrence C; Leow A; Rongo R; Dias G; Farella M Aust Orthod J; 2014 Nov; 30(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 25549519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reproducibility of facial soft tissue landmarks on 3D laser-scanned facial images. Toma AM; Zhurov A; Playle R; Ong E; Richmond S Orthod Craniofac Res; 2009 Feb; 12(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 19154273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is it possible to use cross-sectional and vertical facial measurements to establish the shape of the mandibular arch? El Haje OA; Pompeo DD; Furtado GC; Rivera LM; Paranhos LR J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Nov; 15(6):735-9. PubMed ID: 25825099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of soft-tissue profiles in Le Fort I osteotomy patients with Dolphin and Maxilim softwares. Nadjmi N; Tehranchi A; Azami N; Saedi B; Mollemans W Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Nov; 144(5):654-62. PubMed ID: 24182581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-dimensional analysis of soft tissue changes in full-face view after surgical correction of skeletal class III malocclusion. Yuan L; Shen G; Wu Y; Jiang L; Yang Z; Liu J; Mao L; Fang B J Craniofac Surg; 2013 May; 24(3):725-30. PubMed ID: 23714867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy and repeatability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) measurements used in the determination of facial indices in the laboratory setup. Moerenhout BA; Gelaude F; Swennen GR; Casselman JW; Van Der Sloten J; Mommaerts MY J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 18815053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Automated craniofacial landmarks detection on 3D image using geometry characteristics information. Abu A; Ngo CG; Abu-Hassan NIA; Othman SA BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Feb; 19(Suppl 13):548. PubMed ID: 30717658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. 3D evaluation of sagittal inclination of the maxillary dentition in relation to facial landmarks: A cohort study. El-Sabbagh B; Seidel K; Sayahpour B; Güth JF Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2024 Oct; 26(5):913-921. PubMed ID: 38866529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]